User talk:Ty012345

importScript('User:Evad37/XFDcloser.js'); // User:Evad37/XFDcloser

Deletion discussion about Dujuan Thomas[edit]

Hello, Ty012345, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Eostrix, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Dujuan Thomas, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dujuan Thomas (2nd nomination).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Eostrix}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Eostrix (talk) 07:28, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Eostrix: Thank you for the welcome. I appreciate your feedback and will continue to improve the article, as well as join the discussion. Ty012345 (talk) 06:47, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:44, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:Ty012345/sandbox[edit]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page User:Ty012345/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:29, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ty012345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am confused as to why I was blocked? This is my only account. The article in my sandbox was created BEFORE I created the main article. Which I retrieved some formtting info from Dujuan Thomas's Anybody Wiki page, which saves articles. Please unblock my account so I can continue improving Wiki Ty012345 (talk) 17:30, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry is apparent, if you wish to be unblocked you should address that issue head on. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 03:29, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UNblock disussion[edit]

Intrigued. How did you come to think to create an article about this subject? --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 21:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are there other subjects you would care to edit about? Would you agree to not creating anything else directly, using WP:AfC instead? At any rate, please read that portion of the WP:GAB dealing with sockpuppetry. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 21:45, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give me the link to the Anybody Wiki page? --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 21:49, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed the related behavioral evidence and concur that you are either the same person or someone connected with that person. Please read WP:SOCK. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 21:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]