User talk:Tunasaur

Welcome!

Hello, Tunasaur, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page K. Balabharathi did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 22:31, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Tunasaur, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Benjamin Scott, PhD, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! :Jay8g [V•T•E] 04:55, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jay8g, thank you for reaching out! It's great to contribute to the Wikipedia team. I would really appreciate it if you can proofread the page if you are willing. Also, how is the best way for me to prove that I do not have a conflict of interest with this subject matter? Tunasaur (talk) 05:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The main thing is to write with a neutral point of view and not in a promotional way, as you did in that article. When you write articles like they're a resume, people will assume you have a COI because promotional content is not something that people without a connection to the subject tend to create. I'll also note that all of the sources you provided in the article are not independent sources, which do not demonstrate notability. In its current state, this article is extremely unlikely to be kept. You may want to move it to draft space so that it can be reviewed by others (I expect that someone else will come along and either do that or nominate it for deletion shortly). :Jay8g [V•T•E] 05:36, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That makes a lot of sense, thank you! I do not have a COI but tried to model it after this article (Michael Hasselmo) since they're in the same department. I must not have translated it well enough. I'll move it to draft space and edit it to ensure it meets all the guidelines. Would it be okay with you if I share the draft after I revise it? Tunasaur (talk) 06:04, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh, that article is pretty bad too. Please don't use it as an example! You should probably look at some good articles for examples of what to do. :Jay8g [V•T•E] 06:56, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no! Thank you for letting me know, I will model after those good articles. :) Tunasaur (talk) 19:53, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed the good articles and tried my hand at another! This time, much more of a diverse array of third-party sources :) Draft:Chastity Bowick Tunasaur (talk) 00:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Taíno, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Donald Albury 14:15, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chastity Bowick has been accepted

Chastity Bowick, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Signed, Guessitsavis (she/they) ^Talk 15:11, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Tunasaur (talk) 18:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mason J. Dunn has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mason J. Dunn. Thanks! Royiswariii Talk! 05:55, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boston GLASS (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boston GLASS and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tunasaur! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mason J. Dunn has been accepted

Mason J. Dunn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Xegma(talk) 12:42, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Delia M. Sosa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Delia M. Sosa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delia M. Sosa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 19:59, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]