User talk:Tsiaojian lee

Welcome!

Hello, Tsiaojian lee, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, you can post to the help desk or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Samw 03:11, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hanzi

Thanks for adding all the hanzi! Badagnani 19:00, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How did you figure out Ping Chong and all the other Chinese Americans? That could be hard without actually contacting them directly. Badagnani 18:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First I google with the English name plus one Chinese keyword (e.g. "Ping Chong" +劇場 (i.e. theatre)). Some hits e.g. 1, 2 give his name in both English & Chinese, and they are phonetically consistent. Finally, I do another Google search using only Chinese (+張家平 +劇場). Most of the resulting 19 hits are about a Chinese-American theatre artist, so it's pretty much the same person. --Tsiaojian lee 18:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

urea-formaldehyde resin as animal feed additive

If, from reading the chinese sites, you can determine whether this is marketed primarily for use as NPN in ruminant feed, you might want to move the mention of it down into your new NPN section after the ADM info. Purely on style we should try for some consistency. I went with non-protein nitrogen spelled out so that non-industry types wouldn't have to remember yet another acronym ("NPN") but either way it's great to see the additional info. Abby Kelleyite 23:46, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the editing! The 2 Chinese sites I cited were discussing urea-formaldehyde as an adulteration, so I left that in the "intentional contamination" subsection. Its use in ruminants (which is carried out not only in China but also US, India, USSR, Finland etc.) is moved to the NPN subsection.--Tsiaojian lee 00:51, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I moved them down to the end of the NPN section for now since they aren't melamine specific and haven't been implicated in the specific ingredients involved in the recalled products. See what you think,. I had also taken out the "adulterant" mention {before reading this. oops!] and I'm going back now to change that. Please make sure what I end up with reflects the chinese original. Thanks for all the great new info.! Abby Kelleyite 14:18, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, I think a more general article on food adulteration in China would be an excellent candidate for a permanent article (in addition to this current event article). Abby Kelleyite 14:29, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saw the further reference you added, which was certainly helpful to me. I just wanted to emphasize: 1) the change I made in moving the urea-formaldehyde down is in the nature of suggestion, that is, if you feel it would be clearer back where it was originally, by all means move it back; and 2) I didn't add the chinese language ref to the PRC response, not because I didn't think it shouldn't be there, but because I can't verify what it says. By all means, please add it if you think it's relevant. This was a lot of verbiage, but given the nature of written electronic exchanges, I wanted to make sure you understood that I am not asseting some sort of "ownership" to the article. Abby Kelleyite 13:40, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What you did seems reasonable. I'll continue to follow the changes and add material (esp. those not in mainstream media) when I come across it. I am most interested in examining the surrounding media coverage. Some of my ideas were brought up on the discussion page (thanks for incorporating them into the main article ☺). Some other thoughts may not be suitable here due to wikipedia policy, so I am keeping them in a blog instead. --Tsiaojian lee 02:26, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link to your blog. I think we have some points of agreement that as you say are outside of wiki policy and thus not completely appropriate for discussion here. I've blogged some of this as well. [1] Note that the title and the tone of that post are geared somewhat to the intended audience. Back to here, I'm glad you linked the esb powder. Abby Kelleyite 11:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

melamine versus melamine resin

It seems increasingly like Barboza is talking about melamine monomer but perhaps both kinds are used as NPN adulterants. Have you seen any reference anywhere that raises this as a possibility? It would be good to get the debate, if any, into the article for NPOV. Surely someone quotable has raised this possibility but I can't find it in english, anyway. Abby Kelleyite 18:44, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't seen anybody in mainstream media looking into this. In his Apr 30 article, Barboza said melamine costs "about $1.20 for each protein count per ton". Melamine is about 66% nitrogen while protein has 16%. Assuming a "protein count" = 1% protein, his description means one can replace 1 ton of pure protein by 0.25 ton of melamine at a price of $120. That gives a melamine price of $480/ton, or about 3840 yuan/ton. Compare that with the going price of urea in China (it takes 3 molecule of urea to make 1 molecule of melamine), Barboza's melamine does look more like the monomer. However, from a business point of view, waste melamine plastic would be much cheaper than even monomer (industrial grade of mixed by-product), somewhat less toxic and deliver almost the same amount of NPN... --Tsiaojian lee 21:28, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect that both may be being used, particularly with what you have reported in regard to the "prior art" of using ground urea-formaldehyde resin. There was mention in one of the barboza pieces, if I remember correctly, that the melamine scrap he was talking about used to be free and now is auctioned off. I seriously suspect that it is a mixture of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen of varying compositions (including melamine and cyanuric acid) produced as a residue in the coal->urea->melamine process, much like the mix of hydrocarbon waste in the standard FT coal gasification. I hope (because of the expected lower toxicity) that ground melamine resin may be the more common contaminant. Both companies he's focused on so far, though, have been chemical manufacturers. I fear there may be a lot of this glop. Anyway, if you find even a chinese language only ref re ground melamine resin, I'd add it for balance. Abby Kelleyite 12:41, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After doing some research, I re-wrote the synthesis section of melamine. What you suspected indeed looks VERY LIKELY!! The solid from melamine waste water contains mostly melamine but also some cyanuric acid etc. Since it's an unwanted waste it would also be very cheap. That also explains the cyanuric acid... --Tsiaojian lee 20:41, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, feel free to move this stuff back into the articles discussion page if you want. I added the additional comment here just to make sure you saw it, given that the original discussion has gone somewhat dormant. It might be useful to get this stuff all back in there in case anyone else starts looking into the issue. Abby Kelleyite 14:03, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did we find any english language references while I was away? Abby Kelleyite 15:16, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On May 07, USA Doday did concede that using chemical-grade melamine in place of protein is not economical, but didn't explain what the "scrap" is either.

P.S. I cannot seem to find reference of melamine as food adulterant (in Chinese or English) prior to the pet food fiasco. That doesn't mean food adulteration is uncommon in China, or melamine is absent in the tainted pet food. But it still begs the question: just how "widespread" is it there?--Tsiaojian lee 19:36, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Outstanding work on the melamine production

If you're still here, I think the pet food crisis article has stabilized if you want to incorporate your findings there. Abby Kelleyite 01:15, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added the key references to the melamine cyanuric acid waste product in a couple other places on melamine and in the appropriate research section in melamine, 2007 pet food crisis and cyanuric acid. I also added a few small changes in the melamine production section of the 2007 pet foof crisis reflecting your new info. This last, in particular, could use some more work. Abby Kelleyite 02:25, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, I wanted to mention that I completely understood how you organized the media reports on the melamine page. The only reason I moved a version of the waste product crystallization downpage was so that no one could possibly miss it. I also migrated the cyanuric acid as NPN cites over to the cyanuric acid research summary, which was overdue. Abby Kelleyite 21:24, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Be very careful of your password.

Someone broke into my account but I think I have goth them stopped. Abby Kelleyite 19:45, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Mitbbs logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Mitbbs logo.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 09:02, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Junko Sakurada

An article that you have been involved in editing, Junko Sakurada, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junko Sakurada. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Northwestgnome (talk) 09:40, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mitbbs logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Mitbbs logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 04:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tsiaojian lee. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Real Life Barnstar

Tsiaojian Lee您好:敝姓王任職於故宮，很抱歉在編輯本院出版品時因時間倉促，直接引用您在維基百科上的資料，並在付印後才發現，故來不及依著作權規定標註您的姓名，深感抱歉和遺憾，為彌補這個錯誤，在此想請您授權我引用，如需相關費用或另有疑問有勞您在聯繫我，我的EMAIL是:[email protected]

引用資料頁面為: https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%AD%8C%E5%B7%9D%E5%9C%8B%E8%8A%B3 引用部分共約150字。Cywang26 (talk) 22:05, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]