User talk:Trinitymix

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Triplet, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Baseball,Baby! ^balls^•^strikes 02:05, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did at Colorectal cancer. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Nunquam Dormio 07:21, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trinitymix (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

See below

Decline reason:

We can safely leave the tag on the page without harming anyone or anything. We can also safely leave this account blocked. This works out well for everyone. ➨ ЯEDVERS 19:01, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--I can assure you that this user (a child in my house, whom I have since castigated for this incident) is not General Tojo. I actually don't mind if you leave the user Trinitymix blocked indefinitely, but please do remove the sockpuppet allegation. It was the Stephen Colbert report that inspired this bit of vandalism. My apologies for it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Trinitymix (talk • contribs) .

--Again, I don't mind if you leave the account blocked, but I just don't want my child to have problems if his name gets falsely attached to some vandal (General Tojo). I can assure you that my child is not this person, so would like to respectfully request that you reconsider your decision (or that another administrator please remove the sockpuppet tag). Again, please leave the account blocked, but do please remove the tag. I'd rather not have my child emailing Fred Bauder, as it says. At least: please advise what else I can do at this point. Thanks.

Actually, it appears your child (or whoever was using this account) was actually doing Colbert-style vandalism (claiming a certain subject has tripled in the past six months). I will remove the GT tag (which this user does not appear to be) but I will replace it with an indefblock tag (unless an administrator feels differently). Ryūlóng 01:40, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

You are welcome. Now your child will not be connected to General Tojo, but with the group of Colbert Report viewers that chose to vandalize Wikipedia. Ryūlóng 02:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough! Thank you again!