User talk:TimberHumphrey

November 2013

Hello, I'm 117Avenue. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on Ray William Johnson, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 04:32, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Please provide sources

Hi TimberHumphrey, and welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you find this a rewarding place to contribute your time and efforts. I noticed that in a recent string of edits you've added several pieces of information about a film (saying that it was critically panned and that it was the worst film directed by the director, etc.) I just wanted to let you know that at Wikipedia we require that additions like this be supported by reliable sources to ensure that the additions are not just slander or vandalism by the editor who added them. If you get a moment, could you please provide some references for your claims at this article? If you need help to format the references, please let me know at my talk page. Thanks. -Thibbs (talk) 16:17, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Nut Job 2

The article The Nut Job 2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 16:15, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of The Nut Job 2 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Nut Job 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Nut Job 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nat Gertler (talk) 03:08, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gregory Plotkin

The article Gregory Plotkin has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 19:20, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Thunder and the House of Magic

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Thunder and the House of Magic, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.youtubefullvids.com/2014/05/the-house-of-magic-2013.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:17, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Foodfight!, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 15:33, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gregory Plotkin

The article Gregory Plotkin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Lacks substantial coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 15:47, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Olatunde Osunsanmi

The article Olatunde Osunsanmi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SummerPhD (talk) 15:52, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

December 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Alpha and Omega 2: A Howl-iday Adventure. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Please do not add unsourced material (such as the sequel) and unsourced opinions ("mixed reviews" is contrary to the reviews cited) to articles. Thanks. SummerPhD (talk) 21:14, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. In addition to editing under this user name, you have also been editing without signing in under a dynamic IP (95.107.xxx.xxx). This is clear in comparing your edits here to those made as 95.107.235.180, 95.107.237.127, 95.107.231.90, 95.107.233.64, 95.107.240.29, 95.107.230.213, 95.107.238.13, 95.107.255.120 and numerous others.

You have ignored notices on your user talk page, the talk pages of all of the IPs and numerous articles.

Please remember to sign in when you are editing.

Do not add unsourced material to Wikipedia articles. Do not add unsourced opinions to articles. Do not add false information (such as non-existent Rotten Tomatoes' scores) to articles. Do not repeatedly restore edits reverted by other editors without discussing the issue. If you disrupt Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. SummerPhD (talk) 04:14, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

On-going problem

It now seems you've been at this for much longer than I thought.In addition to this account and the 95.107.XXX.XX IPs, it seems you were also editing as 174.113.185.73 and 2602:304:AF53:3E99:60CD:23B2:6A15:A5D1. That last address is currently under a 2 year block. All of your edits from the start of that block (15:13, October 10, 2014) are subject to revert without explanation, under WP:EVADE. - SummerPhD (talk) 22:25, 2 February 2015 (UTC)