User talk:Tickfiend666
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of A Genesis Found, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://agenesisfound.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:29, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
A Genesis Found OTRS.
[edit]Hi, just to let you know that I've added the {{copyvio}} template, which blanks the "synopsis" section, until the OTRS ticket is processed. If the permission isn't confirmed within a week, the section will be removed. Thisis not the end, however, as the section can be rewritten as original text, or restored when the OTRS ticket is received. Best, – Toon(talk) 15:01, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of A Genesis Found
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article A Genesis Found, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- No evidence that this film meets Wikipedia:Notability_(films). Some local press coverage linked, but "human interest' type stories. No sign of full length reviews by nationally known critics, no evidence of historic notability, no awards, no widespread press coverage: [1]
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:54, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:A genesis found production still.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:A genesis found production still.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en
wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en
wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 13:27, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
The file File:Agf behind scenes.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- unused photo, article on subject was deleted
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:47, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Agf behind scenes.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Agf behind scenes.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:56, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
