User talk:Thrillmecd

License tagging for Image:Playbill coverthrill.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Playbill coverthrill.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:08, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Ransom.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ransom.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:08, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Thrillme3.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Thrillme3.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

"Thrillmecd" is the AUTHOR OF THE THRILL ME, the AUTHOR of the SYNOPSIS, and the AUTHOR of ANY COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL that has ANYTHING to do with THRILL ME. And as the Author, thrillmecd (stephen Dolginoff) has a keen interest in making sure that the page contains accurate and complete information. The photos are the property of "thrillmecd/Stephen Dolginoff" and they were properly "tagged" to my knowledge. I personally own the copyrights and all other rights to these photos.

Regarding your edits to Thrill Me:[edit]

Your recent edit to Thrill Me (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 17:31, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Thrillmecd" is the AUTHOR OF THE THRILL ME, the AUTHOR of the SYNOPSIS, and the AUTHOR of ANY COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL that has ANYTHING to do with THRILL ME. And as the Author, thrillmecd (stephen Dolginoff) has a keen interest in making sure that the page contains accurate and complete information.

As the author of THRILL ME, I have constantly had to correct mis-information and innacurracies that other editors have added.

At this moment, the page is 100% accurate with material provided by the copyright holder.

Copyrighted material[edit]

Your continued addition of the plot summary paragraph to Thrill Me is against Wikipedia policy, as it is a copyright violation. Please refrain from adding the paragraph. I am going to revert the addition, and if you add it again, your actions will be reported. — Music Maker 5376 17:36, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Music Maker: "Thrillmecd" is the AUTHOR OF THE THRILL ME, the AUTHOR of the SYNOPSIS, and the AUTHOR of ANY COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL that has ANYTHING to do with THRILL ME. And as the Author, thrillmecd (stephen Dolginoff) has a keen interest in making sure that the page contains accurate and complete information.

And as the author, I am the only person authorized to put my own copyrighted material, including the COMPLETE synopsis (with intro section in itlalics) that I wrote, onto this page.

Therefore, when you mention a copyright violation, you are incorrect.

Thank you. - Stephen Dolginoff

I have no doubt that you are who you claim to be, and, as such, you need to be aware of the ramifications of what you're doing. I would strongly suggest that you read WP:COPY -- by including copyrighted material in the article you're essentially giving up your copyright. While, legally, you retain copyright, thg GFDL is one step above PD.

Secondly, you should read WP:OWN. You do not own the article. As far as Wikipedia is concerned, you're not Stephen Dolginoff, creator of Thrill Me, you are Thrillmecd, Wikipedian. As such, you are on level ground with every other editor on Wikipedia. Your ideas for the article are no more valid than mine or anyone else's.

Third, the image in the infobox on the article that you claim is your own creation is an issue. You CANNOT release it as GFDL as I'm positive that you're not Playbill magazine (their yellow banner and typeface are copyrighted) nor could you have taken the picture of the production as you, yourself, are in the picture. Whoever took the picture likely owns the copyright, regardless of whatever arrangement you may personally have with the photographer.

I would suggest that, instead of that composite, the logo under the Playbill banner be used in the infobox. Upload it as an UNFREE IMAGE with a proper fair use rationale (I'll even write it for you). Even though you may own the copyright on it, you need to protect your creation. I'm an author, a composer, etc., etc. myself -- I would NEVER release something so near and dear to me under GFDL. Unfortunately for you, the damage may have already been done -- you already have, and I don't think you can unring that bell. — Music Maker 5376 16:16, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Thrill Me. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. — Music Maker 5376 00:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 24 hours. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:59, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest[edit]

Hello. I suggest you read WP:COI; inserting promotional material into an article you are affiliated with would qualify as a conflict of interest per Wikipedia's guidelines and something to be avoided. Crystallina 16:21, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thrillmecd, stop editing this article or you will be banned from Wikipedia permanently. This on-line encyclopedia doesn't exist to promote your work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.78.143.226 (talk) 16:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War and 3 revert rule[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Thrill Me. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. JeanColumbia 01:22, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have just had your IP address blocked for 3RR violations and edit warring, and you've started with this account. If you persist in this edit war, this account will also be blocked. Why not consider just for a second working with us instead of against us? That way you'll get to influence what the article contains as opposed to simply being blocked. Docta247 18:33, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Playbill coverthrill.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on Image:Playbill coverthrill.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD i3.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. — Music Maker 5376 18:49, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Thrillme3.jpg[edit]

I notice you originally uploaded Image:Thrillme3.jpg with the description "widely distributed publicity photo of Original production", then editied as "GFDL-self" which seems possibly contradictary. Can we please sort this out? Are you the photographer that took the photo? Are you the copyright holder? If not, do you have information on who did? Note it is your responsibility to accurately list the source and copyright status of any image you upload. See Wikipedia:Images and associated pages for some guidelines, and if you have questions, feel free to ask. Thanks, -- Infrogmation 00:09, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Playbill coverthrill.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Playbill coverthrill.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 13:00, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Playbill_coverthrill.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Playbill_coverthrill.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 13:18, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thrill Me - vandalism warning[edit]

You have been warned quite enough about this. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Crystallina 05:50, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Thrillmecd for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Crystallina 22:48, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]