User talk:Threewinds

A tag has been placed on Spectrum bridge‎, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Spectrum bridge‎ and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hitrohit2001 (talk) 19:40, 11 July 2008 (UTC)Hitrohit2001

AfD nomination of Spectrum bridge

I have nominated Spectrum bridge, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spectrum bridge. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Hitrohit2001 (talk) 09:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

The original version of the Spectrum Bridge entry needed to be fundamentally rewritten after initial speedy deletion. During the rewrite, more references were added and will be readdressed for their coverage of material. The company itself is well known in the wireless spectrum industry and key FCC circles. Threewinds (talk) 10:44, 23 July 2008

New changes to the article have been made, including deletion of a statement which could not be referenced corectly. Threewinds (talk) 11:37, 23 July 2008

Additional external link added about the FCC official rules adoption concerning secondary leasing of wireless spectrum. Threewinds (talk) 15:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Spectrum Bridge

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Spectrum Bridge, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Spectrum bridge. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:45, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello Threewinds, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Jamesontai Happy editing! - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs 16:12, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Repost of Spectrum Bridge

A tag has been placed on Spectrum Bridge requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Theseeker4 (talk) 17:29, 7 November 2008 (UTC)