User talk:Thparkth/Archives/2011/October

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please comment on Talk:Human

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Human. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 07:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low Readership: Low to High Readership: High, while for quality the scale goes from Low Quality: Low to High Quality: High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Readership: High Quality: Low Avaya ERS-5600 Systems   Readership: Medium Quality: Medium King's Family of Churches
Readership: High Quality: Medium Regeneration (theology)   Readership: High Quality: Medium List of Old Etonians born in the 20th century
Readership: High Quality: Low Homesteading the Noosphere   Readership: High Quality: Low The Brethren Church
Readership: High Quality: Low Release early, release often   Merge
Readership: Medium Quality: Medium Paul A. Weaver   Readership: High Quality: Low Multi-link trunking
Readership: High Quality: Low Nortel Discovery Protocol   Readership: High Quality: Low Fuel hedging
Readership: High Quality: Medium Avaya VSP-9000 System   Readership: Low Quality: Low Peruvian salsa
Readership: Medium Quality: Low St John's College, Auckland   Add sources
Readership: High Quality: Low Barbara Gladstone   Readership: High Quality: High Osama bin Laden
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Yangon Institute of Education   Readership: Medium Quality: Medium Renbrook School
Readership: High Quality: Low Xerotic eczema   Readership: High Quality: Low Maxwell's theorem
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Methanometer   Wikify
Readership: High Quality: Low Oracle Call Interface   Readership: Medium Quality: Medium Extended Secondary School
Readership: High Quality: Low Daniel James III   Readership: High Quality: Medium Cecil Balmond
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Titanium rich scaffold formation   Readership: High Quality: Medium IEEE 802.1aq
Readership: High Quality: Medium Avaya VSP-7000 System   Expand
Readership: High Quality: Low Gansito   Readership: Medium Quality: Medium Results of the Canadian federal election, 2008
Readership: High Quality: Low New British Sculpture   Readership: High Quality: Medium The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Canada
Readership: High Quality: Low Auckland College of Education   Readership: High Quality: High Movable Type

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:17, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sega Genesis and Mega Drive. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Color. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 20:17, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Astrology

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Astrology. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Suicide

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Suicide. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 10:15, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low Readership: Low to High Readership: High, while for quality the scale goes from Low Quality: Low to High Quality: High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Christian Holiness Partnership   Readership: High Quality: Low Seline Hizli
Readership: High Quality: Low Yukon Green Party   Readership: High Quality: Low Covenant Theological Seminary
Readership: High Quality: Low Kelpers   Readership: High Quality: Low Clyde Butcher
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Avaya ERS 2500   Merge
Readership: Low Quality: Low United Citizens Party of Yukon   Readership: High Quality: Low Mission Covenant Church of Sweden
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Green Party of New Brunswick   Readership: High Quality: High St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador
Readership: High Quality: Low Scott McKay   Readership: Low Quality: Low Traditional rice varieties of Tamil Nadu
Readership: High Quality: Low Avaya Communication Servers   Add sources
Readership: High Quality: Low McHappy Day   Readership: Low Quality: Low Zakarias Toftezen
Readership: Medium Quality: Low George Reese (computer programmer)   Readership: Low Quality: Low Fairbanks Street (Dartmouth)
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Alexander Ramsay of Dalhousie   Readership: High Quality: Low Wesleyan Methodist Church of Australia
Readership: High Quality: Low Jonathan Hornblower   Wikify
Readership: Low Quality: Low Inglis Street   Readership: High Quality: Low Fudge Rounds
Readership: High Quality: Low Southern Methodist Church   Readership: High Quality: Low The Chronicle of Philanthropy
Readership: High Quality: Low Del Henney   Readership: Medium Quality: Low Shigeki Morimoto
Readership: High Quality: Low Deep penetrating light therapy   Expand
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Sims Legion Park   Readership: High Quality: Low Lilith (computer)
Readership: High Quality: Low Taras Natyshak   Readership: High Quality: Medium William Douglas, Lord of Liddesdale
Readership: High Quality: Medium Web design   Readership: Medium Quality: Low Wai Yiu

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:37, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 30 October 2011 (UTC)