Jump to content

User talk:The Number 69!

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gwernol 17:29, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Number 69! (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I haven't even fucking vandalized a smelly page on this stupid website and I'm blocked?!?!?!?! And I am not a sockpuppet of this Coolest Kid20 person! SO UNBLOCK ME NOW!!!!!!!!

Decline reason:

Yelling won't help you in the slightest. Unblock requests which are inflammatory are usually declined. — Xclamation point 23:11, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Number 69! (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Okay, okay, I won't yell this time. God, it's so hard to become unblocked. What can I say? Right, I will never vandalize a page on this website again. If I do, you can indefinitely block me again and protect my talk page, so I can't put anymore unblock notices on here.

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block. —  Sandstein  23:33, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Number 69! (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What do you want me to say?? Oh, are you talking about the sockpuppetry thing? But I'm not a sockpuppet of... whoever you put on. Coolest Kid20 or something. That may have been my younger brother because he did say something about being a member of Wikipedia but they kept blocking his accounts. But I'm not him, I've just joined.

Decline reason:

Lying doesn't help either. You didn't "just join". This account was created in July. — Smashvilletalk 17:39, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Number 69! (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Okay, I WAS lying about "just joining", I'm sorry for that. But I'm not lying about my younger brother operating all the other accounts. It really was him. Please, I will never vandalize any pages on this website. As I said before, if I do, you can indefinitely block me again and protect this talk page.

Decline reason:

We have no way of knowing who is controlling what account. It's very common for blocked users to claim someone else (usually their younger brother) was the one vandalising/socking/whatever. That is not a reason to unblock your account. Please review WP:GAB for some tips on how to better format your request, and be aware that further spurious requests will likely result in this page being protected. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 19:17, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Number 69! (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Okay, I read that WP:GAB article, and on the sockpuppetry part (which is what I am blocked for), it says you have to make the unblock request from your original account. But my brother told me (I know you don't know who is controlling the accounts, but it is true) that the original first account he made (Coolest Kid20) had its talk page protected; so am I allowed to make the unblock notice here? If yes, then I'm going to be good with this website and not vandalize it at all. If I do, then it was a mistake and I didn't know it was vandalism. I hope this is good enough.

Decline reason:

Nope. "My brother/friend/dog did it is a well-worn excuse. If this account is the same as Coolest Kid20, we have had this conversation before. Protonk (talk) 21:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Number 69! (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

How can we have had the conversation before when I wasn't the one who created the stupid account (Coolest Kid20). Seriously, it was my BROTHER! Why won't you assholes just believe me? I've never lied before! And also: YOU MOTHER-FUCKING LOSERS PROTECTED THIS PAGE FOR ONE FUCKING YEAR?!?!?!?!?!?! Seriously, I only got a bit angry 'cuz you idiots won't unblock me when I've done nothing wrong, and you protect the page for a whole year! That's way too long! At the very maximum, it should've been only like one month! Seriously, if you twats protect this page again, YOU'RE GAY! Oh wait, you already are. Well, you're MORE gay if you protect it again! Anyway, my reason: I'VE DONE NOTHING TO THIS WEBSITE! UNBLOCK ME NOW!

Decline reason:

That's enough. Talk page editing access revoked. Go do something else more constructive with your life. –MuZemike 19:19, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.