User talk:The Apocalypse (Doomsday) Editor

October 2017

Hello, I'm 72. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Blood moon prophecy seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. –72 _(talk) 13:39, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Blood moon prophecy. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. –72 _(talk) 13:49, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Blood moon prophecy, you may be blocked from editing. –72 _(talk) 13:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. –72 _(talk) 13:55, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Tiderolls 14:02, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information

I've blocked this account to stop recent and continuing disruption. I've specified the block period as indefinite because your editing pattern seemed particularly unhelpful to me. However, indefinite does not mean infinite. If you can post an unblock request that convinces another administrator that the block period is excessive it's possible you may regain your editing privilege. Please read WP:GAB Tiderolls 14:02, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]