User talk:TheValentineBros

Image tagging for Image:StanSouthPark.PNG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:StanSouthPark.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:11, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What can I say? It was my pleasure. Oh, and check out the image for the Walt Disney Classics logo from 1992,

.TVB

Image:1992dhvc.PNG[edit]

Hello, TheValentineBros. An automated process has found and removed a fair use image used in your userspace. The image (Image:1992dhvc.PNG) was found at the following location: User talk:TheValentineBros. This image was removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image was replaced with Image:Example.jpg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image to replace it with. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 23:33, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:1992dhvc.PNG)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:1992dhvc.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:24, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Walt Disney Masterpiece logo.PNG[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Walt Disney Masterpiece logo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:50, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:EnhancedColumbia.PNG[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:EnhancedColumbia.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 19:26, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007[edit]

Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Meg Griffin, as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one (and vice versa) is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. [1] And please don't call revert warring a minor edit. / edg ☺ ☭ 03:16, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. The reason why is because I read the Meg Griffin article on Family Guy wikia and I was having a bad day. Sorry. TVB 03:37, Christmas Eve 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:190008227 m.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:190008227 m.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:58, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:190008227 m.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:190008227 m.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:05, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Stewie Family Guy.JPG)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Stewie Family Guy.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:10, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of programmes broadcast by Paramount Comedy, you will be blocked from editing. —HMR 20:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm sorry.TVB 23:27, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's All right. —HMR 20:40, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Box office number-one films of 2000 (USA), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - JPG-GR (talk) 06:41, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't test on articles[edit]

Hi. Given your actions on Major film studio, Studio system, Movie studio, and others, you seem to believe that established articles are the appropriate venue in which to perform "tests." They are not. If you want to test things, you can use the Wikipedia:Sandbox or create your own sandbox, where you are always free to do what you want. Here's an easy way to create that:

(1) Copy the following: User:TheValentineBros/sandbox

(2) Paste it into the "search" box on the left-hand side of your Wikipedia window and click on "Go"

(3) Click on "Start the User:TheValentineBros/sandbox page"

There you go!

As an aside, I have to say your "tests" are extremely odd. I assume, for instance, that you know that The Weisntein Company didn't even exist during Hollywood's classic era, let alone constituted a major studio. To have that egregious error and others like it appear in a Wikipedia article even for a minute or two hardly helps the reputation of our project.

Best of luck in the future, Dan.—DCGeist (talk) 03:32, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

United States and Canada at the box office[edit]

Hey, I saw {{Lists of box office number-one films}} and wanted to give you the heads-up that the box office numbers for the United States and Canada are reported together, so there does not need to be a separate group for Canada. See what Box Office Mojo says: "All grosses published reflect domestic earnings, i.e., United States and Canada, unless otherwise noted." We're also discussing moving the box office articles to reflect that they are lists since they are largely lists of numbers; see WT:FILM#Lists of box office number-one films. Feel free to share your thoughts! —Erik (talk • contrib) 17:01, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

but how? TVB00:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How what? For the template, the grouping can be "United States and Canada" instead of separating them. As for moving the articles, we're discussing the best name to move them to. If you want to share your thoughts, go to the WT:FILM link. —Erik (talk • contrib) 01:49, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Gal hayley.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Gal hayley.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 23:00, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Box office number-one films of 2009 (USA), are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. - JPG-GR (talk) 18:27, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. one brave monkey 08:21, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:TheAngryBeavers[edit]

Template:TheAngryBeavers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. treelo _radda 08:49, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to List of Disney feature films, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. McDoobAU93 (talk) 02:50, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Saludos Amigos. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. McDoobAU93 (talk) 02:51, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Template:Disney theatrical animated features. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. McDoobAU93 (talk) 22:48, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox articles[edit]

The reasaon I did this [2] to your sandbox films is that it is inappropriate for sandbox articles to in mainspace categories. Please do not revert again. Its easy enough to remove the nowiki tags when you move the articles to mainspace--Jac16888 ^Talk 21:30, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009[edit]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. one brave monkey 15:17, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for ImageMovers Digital [edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, ImageMovers Digital , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Rob Sinden (talk) 10:29, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your recent changes![edit]

Thanks for your recent edits!! - There should be more people in the world who do something constructive like this. 189.217.171.135 (talk) 02:04, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries[edit]

I have noticed that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! Powers ^T 14:44, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I second this. Usually, the ones that edit without an edit summary are mischievous ^_~.--Cinemaniac⁸⁶_{Dane_Cook_Hater_Extraordinaire} 23:21, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hoodwinked 2; 3-D or not 3-D.[edit]

I saw that there was a new category on Hoodwinked 2, which was 3-D films. I have looked over the web, and there is no information about it being in 3-D. Can you please tell me where you got the info? --Joshua H-Star-R 00:28, 25 November 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshua H-Star-R (talk • contribs)

Non Free Images in you User Space[edit]

Hey there TheValentineBros, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free images are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some images that I found on User:TheValentineBros/sandbox53. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page. See a log of images removed today here, shutoff the bot here and report errors here. Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 23:00, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010[edit]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to List of 20th Century Fox films. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. MikeWazowski (talk) 15:24, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey you!![edit]

Don't say that Master and Commander wasn't co-produced by Samuel Goldwyn Films! IMDB says SGF co-produced Master and Commander. I undid your revision so don't delete the MAC: TFSOTW film! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.44.119.71 (talk) 16:35, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Regency Enterprises, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 23:23, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:00, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop.[edit]

You've been creating fictitious little quasi-articles in your userspace (Feldspar? Bttf part 4? C&H, the movie?!?). Stop that at once.

You can do a lot of stuff with userspace, but not absolutely anything. Creating fiction and then leaving it in your userspace is not permissible.

I'll give you five days to go through and save anything you might want to keep, then I'm sweeping through and deleting it all. You can make things go faster by adding {{db-u1}} to each page once you've saved the page as a local document.

Don't do it again. DS (talk) 14:28, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

sorry. Usually when I do them, i am bored. So how do I save them?TVB 20:33, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Save them to your hard drive as text files. Select all, copy, paste. DS (talk) 12:39, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmh, I got distracted. You've had two weeks to save anything you wanted to keep. If there's anything else you wanted, too late. DS (talk) 16:01, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why there are some changes is because i wanted to save them in my drive and i wanted to not lose them. but sometimes, i go to wikipedia in my school and i save them in the school.TVB 13:40, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to List of films released by Touchstone Pictures has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — $Jeff G. ツ$ 07:26, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of television series notable for negative reception, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ne'er-do-well (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mark Dindal[edit]

Template:Mark Dindal has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:28, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Major film studio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Picturehouse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peter Segal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grudge Match (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Never, Never![edit]

A Cancelled Projects list is just referenced from the version history of Blue Sky Studios, why did you and other users keep undoing it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.150.85.167 (talk) 20:42, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Censorship of music may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=4989818&blogID=456111734 |title=Drowning Pool official MySpace blog(Stevie Bentons Apology |publisher=Blogs.myspace.com |date= December 14, 2008 |accessdate= October

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:28, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Development hell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Epic (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reboot (fiction), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saw (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 22 March[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the 2017 in film page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, TheValentineBros. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Song category: Written for Film[edit]

Please stop repeatedly adding this to multiple pages about songs that were not written for films (even if they might have been later used in one). It's got to the point where it looks more like vandalism rather than good-faith confusion. Thanks. N-HH talk/edits 11:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. N-HH talk/edits 12:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Swarm ♠ 07:34, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheValentineBros (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to apologize for using various songs put in films, since after late-November of last year, it seemed like the category was changed from songs used for film to Category:Songs written for film; which I assumed that being myself, I thought I would know more about research, since I usually do a lot of research, and I will never do any of this again. That said, I would like to request an unblock since all of this, as mentioned here, was just myself not knowing what difference between songs for film nor songs written for film are, and I promise that I won't be able to do any of this ever again. / User:TheValentineBros

Decline reason:

I've gone through quite a few of your recent edits, beyond the categories, and the vast majority showed problems with the references. Thus I have to decline this request. Huon (talk) 21:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MfD nomination of User:TheValentineBros[edit]

User:TheValentineBros, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TheValentineBros and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:TheValentineBros during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 18:20, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]