User talk:TheCrazyGuy6

Welcome[edit]

Hello TheCrazyGuy6, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

TheCrazyGuy6, good luck, and have fun. – ThisGuyIsGreat (talk) 01:25, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TheCrazyGuy6, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi TheCrazyGuy6! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Samwalton9 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ludwig Von Drake, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. MarnetteD|Talk 01:27, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Those are not unsourced, they were the voices of him. TheCrazyGuy6 (talk) 01:28, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Kiefer Sutherland. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. –Davey2010^Talk 01:29, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Materialscientist (talk) 01:54, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, what they are doing is incorrect, they are the one that are vandalizing the article, not me, block them, not me!, I was only putting information back in the article. The way it's suppose to be. Corey Burton voices him, please block those users, not me. TheCrazyGuy6 (talk) 01:58, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheCrazyGuy6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ebaybe and MarnetteD are the ones that are bulling me, they are the ones vandalizing the pages against me, block them not me. I was putting correct information back in the article again and they keep whipping out the sourced information I was putting back. My edits are correct.

Decline reason:

This is now a checkuser block; you'll need to address this with your original account. Kuru (talk) 16:35, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I can't, because I'm talk page access is blocked. I can't reply on it. TheCrazyGuy6 (talk) 17:46, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheCrazyGuy6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ebaybe and MarnetteD are the ones that are bulling me, they are the ones vandalizing the pages against me, block them not me. I was putting correct information back in the article again and they keep whipping out the sourced information I was putting back. My edits are correct.

Decline reason:

Checkuser evidence confirms that you have abused multiple accounts. Mike V • Talk 21:13, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|I already told you, I'm not a sock of anyone at all, like I said again, Ebaybe and MarnetteD are the ones that are bulling me, they are the ones stocking me and harassing me, why can't you guy's do the right thing and block them for harassing me, and for vandalizing the articles of what they've been doing too. I was putting edits back the way they were is what I've been doing, I was doing the right thing, they weren't. They do all that on purpose to get innocent users blocked.}}

Yes, please block that horrible Ebaybe. He removes unsourced material and fixes articles like Christopher Awdry. Stop him before he wikilinks again. Or something. ---‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 23:26, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, even though you fixed that article, you did remove source information of the Ludwig Von Drake article removing his "Current" voice actor, on purpose. TheCrazyGuy6 (talk) 23:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since you're going to play games, I've removed your talk page access again. You'll need to use WP:UTRS if your master account is blocked. Kuru (talk) 00:47, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]