User talk:The-Giant-Andrew

Hi, I notice you've relisted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V.V.L.N.Sastry‎. Per WP:DEL - "A nomination that gets little response after the discussion period has ended can be relisted" - the discussion period still has one day to go and it's not lacking responses! Just wondered if you're aware of exceptions or other policies covering this that I'm not? Cassandra 73 (talk) 22:10, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! this edit summary is way out of line. I hope you won't be making similar personal attacks in the future, because I'd hate to have to block you from editing. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:53, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry; I left that message before I saw User talk:Davidoff86. Since you're going out of your way to be insulting, I'm going to have to go ahead and block you so you don't alienate our new users. That makes me sad. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:00, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:00, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RFA[edit]

Heck no. My last RFA was less than a month ago and it didn't even get 50% approval before I pulled the plug. I think I've only gotten worse since then, and I have a hard time believing that a nom from a n00b who recently got blocked for attacking will fly. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 00:04, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page move[edit]

Hi, Mr Giant! I am a little confused by your recent page move. Do you think you might be able to shed some light on it for me? Thanks!!! Basket of Puppies 00:01, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SPI[edit]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/K.duan2009. Thank you. --ThaddeusB (talk) 00:14, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The-Giant-Andrew (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am aware the evidence against me seems strong but just because I happened to move a article made by a blocked user seems too fast to make a judgement. I am sure there are many new users that were experienced well and were accused of being a sockpuppet.

Decline reason:

My CU don't lie. Brandon (talk) 00:50, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AfD nomination of Oscar van Dillen[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Oscar van Dillen, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oscar van Dillen (2nd nomination). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jubilee♫clipman 01:38, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]