User talk:TallGuyshort

July 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One was changed by TallGuyshort (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.927749 on 2024-07-22T15:03:54+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Big Hero 6 (film). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Big Hero 6 (film) was changed by TallGuyshort (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.90648 on 2024-07-22T15:31:20+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:31, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Fast X. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Frost 14:53, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mike Allen 21:26, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Autism, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Likewise Death at a Funeral (2010 film). Please raise a discussion on the article talk page(s) if necessary. Mitch Ames (talk) 03:51, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Christopher Robin (film), you may be blocked from editing. Barry Wom (talk) 10:32, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lily Collins. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's no blocked on my editing users TallGuyshort (talk) 17:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 'successful' to 'reverted' ratio of this account suggests to me that they are not here to improve the encyclopedia. Careless edits (grammar, syntax), insistence that 'British' is to be used rather than 'English', etc. However, once in a rare while there are perfectly and carefully submitted changes, which also suggests this may be a shared account. Some edit summaries appear to confirm the disinterest in improving the encyclopedia. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 22:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine TallGuyshort (talk) 16:27, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Josh Bowman, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Stop. You have been warned previously yet continue making unconstructive edits without rationale. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 19:47, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:24, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry TallGuyshort (talk) 21:12, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. You can make me to continuously changing things that helpful? There's no blocking or violations or anything like that in your privacy.

Sorry about that. You can make me to continuously changing things that helpful? There's no blocking or violations or anything like that in your privacy. TallGuyshort (talk) 17:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to dispute the block, please follow the directions that are presented in the box with the red 'x'. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 21:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Log me in. Thanks TallGuyshort (talk) 21:12, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only you can log yourself in. That should be self-evident. You were logged in when you posted this most recent comment. As you've been instructed, you can provide your explanation for why you should be unblocked by following the directions within the box above with the red 'X'. I'm done repeating myself. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 21:38, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How to unblocked it to change the edit so I change things? Instruct me TallGuyshort (talk) 19:48, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]