Hi Tahamzd! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).
Hello, I'm 1989. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Al-Mu'ayyad Ahmad have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. MCMLXXXIX 23:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for October 3[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ivan Zaytsev (volleyball), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al-Arabi SC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for October 10[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edwin Benne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page World League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kambiz Dirbaz for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Hello, Tahamzd. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Kambiz Dirbaz, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please don't add red-linked categories.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Hello, I'm Bennv3771. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Samsung, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 13:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop adding unsourced content into articles. Bennv3771 (talk) 13:14, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Tahamzd. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Disambiguation link notification for December 14[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adidas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ivan Zaytsev (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:43, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please add your sources to Brasil Vôlei Clube. It has 'external links' but this means 'suggestions for further reading' rather than sources used in the creation of the article. If these are actually your sources, please just change the heading and remove the unref tag. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 11:08, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So you have chosen not to respond and to create more unreferenced articles? Supercoppa italiana (volleyball) at least has external links, but that means suggestions for further reading, not sources. Please respond to this message. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 13:56, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Particularly concerning is Konstantin Shumov, a biography of a living person with no sources, and for living people they need to be WP:INLINECITED. Boleyn (talk) 14:07, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A page you started (Brasil Vôlei Clube) has been reviewed![edit]
Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Hello Tahamzd: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 11:09, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
You have continued to ignore messages re sourcing and communication. You have removed unref tags without addressing the issue and without an edit summary. I again point you to WP:Communication is required and WP:BURDEN. Boleyn (talk) 08:32, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix.
Hello Tahamzd: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 10:38, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
This remains unrferenced three weeks after an editor raised this concern with you. Please add your sources. Boleyn (talk) 17:47, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix.
Hello Tahamzd: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 03:56, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your referemces.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Emmanuel Adebayor. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Infobox accounts for league stats only.Mattythewhite (talk) 16:04, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please see WP:BURDEN, WP:V and WP:Communication is required. If you continue to violate these, despite numerous warnings, I will initiate an ANI and you risk an indefinite block. Boleyn (talk) 21:32, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You have now removed a refimprove tag from Supercoppa italiana, although it has an empty references section and only an external link, which means suggestion for further reading rather than source used in the creation of the article. You also left no edit summary. I then checked the edit history of this page - this is the fourth time you have removed the refimprove/unref tag, even though you have added no references and refused to respond to other editors' concerns raised on your talk page. You have done the same at Serie A1 (volleyball). This is not acceptable. Please respond; again WP:Communication is required. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 17:44, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:44, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Volley2002.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Tahamzd, unfortunately I've had to block you indefinitely due to your complete refusal to communicate. Editors are repeatedly coming to you with problems with your editing, problems that are easily fixed, but it appears that you're either unable or unwilling to communicate in even a basic manner. Communication is required if you wish to edit here. Swarm♠ 23:56, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Tahamzd, deleting the above message is another example of why you have been blocked, and I've restored it as other editors need to be aware that you are unable to respond to add sources at the moment. Please think carefully, and then when you feel you have understood why the block has been put in place, put in an unblock request. Best of luck, Boleyn (talk) 19:38, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Why did my 200 articles be deleted?!!!!!!!!!!!! Return all my efforts and writings.. please!. This comportment is not fair. mr: swarm and Boleyn - Tahamzd (talk) 12:51, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Is here North Korea?!! Why are you not responding?[edit]
Why did my 200 articles be deleted?!!!!!!!!!!!! Return all my efforts and writings.. please!. This is not a human behavior / mr JamesBWatsonTahamzd (talk) 12:56, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You must have seen the deletion log entries, or else you would not have known that I had deleted the articles. Those log entries tell you why they were deleted.
And no, we do not restore editing done by editors who evade blocks by using sockpuppet accounts. If we did then there would be no disincentive to just creating more sockpuppets to evade the next block. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:37, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm 1989. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Al-Mu'ayyad Ahmad have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. MCMLXXXIX 23:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Turkish Airlines, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer Talk 00:54, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_cropped.jpg)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Emmanuel Adebayor. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Infobox accounts for league stats only.
Mattythewhite (talk) 16:04, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Boleyn (talk) 18:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
