User talk:TSWikis1
Welcome!
[edit]
|
October 2011
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Amy Daly has been reverted.
Your edit here to Amy Daly was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.twitter.com/amydalyxxx) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:42, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amy Daly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Daly until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:14, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. You are repeatedly adding content to the Amy Daly article associating an identifiable individual as this pornographic performer, without providing any reliable source for the identification. This is a violation of Wikipedia policy regarding biographies of living persons. Note that removal of such BLP violations is expressly exempted from 3RR limits.Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:41, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Edit warring complaint filed
[edit]November 2011
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:23, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
TSWikis1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My reverts were reverts from another user who has been harassing the article. I attempted several times to add new and better sources and secondary sources only to have them completely deleted and accused of reverting changes. I will be filing a complaint against user hullabalo wolfawitz for continuing to revert my changes TSWikis1 (talk) 20:28, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
BLP noticeboard
[edit]Hi, sorry your blocked but although you felt you were right, and you might well be, discussion is the only way these issues get worked out. Here at wikipedia we take great care in the additions about living people, When you are unblocked, please don't edit the article and join in the discussion at the noticeboard where we will work all this out. See here - Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Amy_Daly - Regards - Off2riorob (talk) 16:49, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hello. Now that I am unblocked and it looks like I am not the only one verifying the information, when can it be added back to the article? I would like to be able to update other transsexual performers articles as well, but it seems that user wolfawitz hullabaloo is pretty tough on new editors.
Please post to the talk page your proposed changes and continue to discuss it before making any changes. If the user doesn't respond in a week or so, you can fee free to readd the content. Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:24, 21 November 2011 (UTC)