User talk:T@nn

This user may have left Wikipedia. T@nn has not edited Wikipedia since April 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, T@nn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Merovingian - Talk 16:25, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mythology

I've noticed that you have written about mythological subjects, some of which have linked to my list of missing topics about mythology. Good work. Do you have any comments about the list? - Skysmith 12:14, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

merging the Stephen Oppenheimer page

Do you still think the Oppenheimer page should be merged? Let me know if you do, and I'll leave the tag, otherwise I will remove it in a day or two (I don't much like the look of all this wikipedia-internal cruft at the beginning of articles). Cheers, Ngio 20:51, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've put links between the two articles, and made a start of tidying up the horrible mess on the Oppenheimer page -- Ngio 07:58, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan

Hi Tann, {{orphan}} puts the article in the orphan category, no need to add the cat by hand. Rich Farmbrough, 14:58 16 March 2007 (GMT).

Copyright violations

Please remove all the information from Wikipedia that you have copied directly from recently published books and websites. If the content remains a formal complaint will be lodged with Wikipedia administration on behalf of the publishers. Regards --Valeren 06:20, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just glancing at your recent posts, entries like Proclia, and the sort, are very well done: with useful back references to the primary source for easy verification. But something like Agreus, which is copied almost word for word, is not allowed. Simply replacing a few words or re-arranging a sentence is not sufficient to avoid this being classed as plagiarism -- especially when it comprises 30% or more of a page published online by some web-author: whether that be Theoi or Encyclopedia Mythica, Greek Mythology Link, or any other web source or print-published book. Wikipedia is, of course a high profile site, and is increasingly being held to a higher standard, so care on what material is used needs to be taken.

Consulting primary sources should at least create a need to summarize material in your own words and so avoid the problem. The translations themselves are probably, in most cases, copyright under American law -- to which Wikipedia is held compliant -- but the information within can easily be paraphrased. Anyway, keep up the good work with organising and cataloging the mythology articles. --Valeren 11:34, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a friendly reminder to use an edit summary when proposing deletion for an article. Edit summary usage is always good, but it is especially important that edit summaries are used when proposing deletion. The reason for this is that articles proposed for deletion that later have the {{prod}} tag removed should not be proposed for deletion again, but rather sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. The only easy way to check if an article was previously proposed for deletion is to look at the edit history and the edit summaries people have left before. Thanks! Oo7565 07:30, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For All the Work on the Greek Mythology pages

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		You kept popping up on my watchlist today on all the mythology pages, and when I took a look at your contributions, I had to give you this! Thanks for all the categorizing and detail edits you've done today on the Greek Gods and Godesses and deities/creatures/etc. pages! You've contributed quite a lot and I just want to let you know that it's all greatly appriciated! Keep up the great work! Thank you! Irish♣Pearl 16:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Corcyra

Hello, I noticed that you created an article Corcyra (mythology) on April 4. This is the same as Korkyra that you edited three days earlier on April 1. Korkyra, the original article, was created 18 June 2006. There was no reason to create another article with exactly the same name but with latin spelling especially if you knew about the pre-existence of Korkyra. Linking to two articles with the same mythological figure but different spellings creates confusion. Therefore I suggest you merge Corcyra (mythology) with Korkyra. Thanks. Dr.K. 18:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good work. Thanks again. Dr.K. 19:41, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sorting

When adding categories to people, do not forget to add proper category sorting to new added category or DEFAULTSORT template. You forgot that in Category:Charles University alumni, i am correcting it now. Thanks --Jklamo 14:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Categories, categories

I noticed you are helping us out at Wikipedia:WikiProject Categories/uncategorized/previous-April. Thank you! Would you like to join the Uncategorized Task Force? That would be great. By the way, you can put [[:Category:Mythology stubs]] (notice the beginning colon) on your userpage instead of the external link. Just a cool tip that maybe you'd wanna use. See you around =) →Ed Gl 14:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More on categories

I notice you've been editing some categories, e.g. in Terry Pratchett. Please note that when there's a DEFAULTSORT statement in the article (e.g. {{DEFAULTSORT|Pratchett, Terry}}) then it's not necessary to include "|Pratchett, Terry" as a parameter to every category - the defaultsort statement does it all for you automatically. -- Arwel (talk) 01:16, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Translations

Hello! I noticed you came across the Tejutla article and left a note about it needing a translation on its talk page. If you happen to come across something like that again, please feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English or add the "Category:Wikipedia articles needing translation" tag to it so we can find it, thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yupik (talk • contribs) 23:24, 22 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Yehp, that's mine, sorry about that :) -Yupik 08:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DEFAULTSORT:

Howdy, I only recently was notified that DEFAULTSORT uses a ":" rather than a "|". The ":" forces a template to be used, but the preferred syntax is with the ":". I have been using this link: Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:DEFAULTSORT to monitor the template usage and found a sudden surge when I logged in today. I will try to fix some along the way. Happy Trails! Schmiteye 14:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! That was fast. Thanks for being so responsive. Schmiteye 03:51, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

categorization tip

Hi. Thanks for your help on the previous/april page. I noticed your question and I don't have a good answer but one thing you can do when in doubt is to ask at the talk page of Wikipedia:WikiProject Categories/uncategorized. Someone there is bound to know. Pascal.Tesson 16:34, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Please just leave a reply under here stating that you saw this - thanks. ST47Talk 03:10, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello to you to. Yes, I saw this. What's this about? T@nn 03:11, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cfd notification: Category:University of Illinois alumni

You recently created Category:University of Illinois alumni. I have nominated it for deletion for the following reason: This is a redundant category; the established category is Category:University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign alumni. If you would like to comment on this, you can do so in the discussion section for this nomination. Regards --ShelfSkewed talk 19:34, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Followup: I've already changed my position to Keep as a parent category for all three campuses' alumni categories (Springfield & Chicago alumni don't have categories yet), and it looks like that's the way it's going to go.--ShelfSkewed talk 00:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merging Polyxena/Polyssena

Hi I support your proposed merger of these two articles, assuming it is with Polyxena as the main article. --Peter cohen 19:52, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DEFAULTSORT

I noticed that you added this template to a whole bunch of articles in my watchlist, but I can't seem to figure out what it does exactly? Could you please give me a simple explanation? Thanks! – Lordmontu _{(talk) • (contribs)} 02:04, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uncat people

In case you didn't catch it, I thought I'd point out a recent edit of mine, which might be of interest to you. --Fisherjs 13:05, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I'll get started on clearing your category within the next few days. T@nn 13:09, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Masons

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Masons, by Mais oui!, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Masons fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

{{{2}}}

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Masons, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Category:Masons itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 07:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries, please.

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

--199.71.174.100 21:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Philip Strax

You contributed to an article on Dr. Philip Strax. I had a close relationship with this man (RIP), and I would like to add to this article some biographical information. As this would be the first article that I would be making a substantial contribution to, would you be willing to help guide me through the process of compiling the information?

The article can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Strax

Thank you very much for your time. Please contact me by e-mail: [email protected]

~ SandManMattSH, 07:12, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kris Hager

I speedily closed your MFD nomination on this page because it's an article; you'll need to take it to AFD instead, as MFD isn't for articles. :) --Core desat 07:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Icewind Dale II

Hi. That game is already categorised as Forgotten Realms videogame, which via D&D videogames is already in the Fantasy videogame topcat. So I removed that cat again. Cheers. MadMaxDog 06:24, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fantasy role-playing games

T@nn,

You've been adding fantasy role-playing video games to Category:Fantasy role-playing games. THat category isn't for CRPGs, but rather for none-electronic RPGs. If you wish, try Category:Fantasy role-playing video games instead. Percy Snoodle 13:15, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

68.39.174.238 18:10, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Rick Sebeck

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Rick Sebeck, by Closedmouth (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Rick Sebeck is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Rick Sebeck, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Yogi buehrle

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Yogi buehrle, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Yogi buehrle is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Yogi buehrle, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 14:10, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Sherida

Sherida, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Sherida satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherida (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Sherida during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jmlk 1 7 11:07, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pseudoscience writers

FYI: Category:Pseudoscience writers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion at Categories for Discussion. You are invited to contribute your views to the discussion. Cgingold 12:14, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Television-book writers

FYI: Category:Television-book writers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion or renaming. You are invited to share your views in the discussion. Cgingold 12:18, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cissonia?

Hi; I noticed that you mentioned on the Cissonius page that a secondary source mentioned an associated goddess Cissonia. Do you have any further specifics for this? I know of, for example, Visucia who was associated with Mercurius Visucius on a couple inscriptions from the Rhineland (Trier and Köngen). Does Miranda Green give any information of this kind? Q·L·1968 ☿ 23:41, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:High Rock

I have nominated Category:High Rock (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:26, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Raymond E. Feist

Hi, seeing from your recent contributions you have been fairly interested in the works of Raymond E. Feist. I am currently considering about starting a brand new Wiki-project (or maybe a task force) and will need your help – if you are interested could you please sign at WP:COUNCIL/P. Thanks very much Fattyjwoods ^{(Push my button)} 06:53, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category sorting

A reminder that DEFAULTSORT uses a colon, not a pipe, thus: {{DEFAULTSORT:Alps}}, not {{DEFAULTSORT|Alps}}. —Paul A (talk) 01:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Tankboy

An article that you have been involved in editing, Tankboy, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tankboy. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:25, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you. --Flash176 (talk) 03:04, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Categorizing

Hello. When adding categories, please can you check the edit history for any prior vandalism? When prior vandalism has occurred, you should then revert to an earlier version. Here is at least one you missed. Thanks! Stephenb (Talk) 08:35, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And another! Please be careful out there... Cheers, Stephenb (Talk) 15:10, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No sooner than I find one, but I find yet another...! Stephenb (Talk) 15:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, no problem, I just thought I'd bring these things to your attention. I find that a lot of the time articles (especially long-standing articles, or articles that have well-known subjects) that don't have a category is because of vandalism. This is usually an anon IP address "blanking" certain areas, such as anything under "References", including the "interwiki" links you seem to be confused about. Usually, the edit summary has no comment about why it was all removed, too. The key thing is to check the history, and if all the categories have been removed recently, do a comparison with a previous version to see what else got removed.
Incidentally, another reason that articles don't have categories (or don't appear to have) is because of a broken reference tag - 80% of the time this is also due to vandalism! Anyway, thanks for the hard work categorizing articles (keep it up! It's appreciated!), just be careful :) Stephenb (Talk) 11:17, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

James Crittenden-Cavendish

You're right - it's a hoax. Well spotted. I have investigate its improbable-sounding claims, and taken it to AfD here. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:05, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Karl Moore (academic)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Karl Moore (academic), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Karl Moore. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:51, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

birthday of William Wailes

On May 22, 2007 you edited [1] William Wailes to add categories of his birth and death years. The birth year contradicts the article. Was this a mistake or do you have a contradictory source. If it was a mistake, can you please correct it; if it has a source could you please include it. ~~And then remove the article from Wikipedia:Biographical pages with several incompatible dates of birth/4 (Batch 62).~~ Thanks. Jon513 (talk) 12:39, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it from the list. Jon513 (talk) 12:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Korati (goddess)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Korati (goddess), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.telugupedia.com/wiki/index.php?title=Korati. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:02, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll address this one with the contributor. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:08, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I meant to put that note on corenbot's page. :) I'll duplicate it. Give me a minute, and I'll explain how this can be handled. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:09, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The bot searches for text strings across the internet. It picked up a site that had mirrored Wikipedia and noticed the duplication. This isn't a copyright infringement, since the material is released under GFDL, but ordinarily we would have to provide a direct link to the source article to show who wrote it. GFDL requires that we give the authors credit. In this case, it's all right, since you wrote it. (See Help:Merge and Wikipedia:Splitting if you want information on how we usually handle moving information.)

But I'm not sure that a new article is necessary. The person who removed the information on the goddess was not necessarily adding constructive content. I would like to suggest that we restore the original article to its first form and then delete the new one as unneeded. If you think that Korati the goddess should be separated from Korati the village, we can do that, but we should figure out first which one should be moved. If Korati the goddess is the better known use of the term, the village should be moved. If the village is the better known term, the new goddess article should probably stay.

I'm watching your page, so please just let me know how you'd like to proceed. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure. To tell the truth I didn't write either of the pages. I just found the original version of the article that listed the goddess and copy and pasted the information across. I know nothing about either of the topics and I certainly don't know which one would be better known. I'm just categorising articles at the moment and happened to notice this (whilst checking the previous versions of the article to see if there were categories that had gotten edited out. T@nn (talk)

Oh, you're right. My bad. :) I don't know why I thought you were the original contributor. Then what we need to do is merge it back in. If we want to split it out, we'd have to follow the processes at that page. Otherwise, we're doing a "copy & paste" move, which is a problem under GFDL, since we are required to give credit to our contributors. I'll go ahead and restore the previous information and delete the new article under WP:CSD#G6. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:19, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, then, and thank you. Sorry for the hassle. It's been months since I got back into Wikipedia and there's a lot I have to relearn. T@nn (talk) 13:20, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. :) It's a big wiki; there's tons to learn & remember! Anyway, I've restored the article as it was before it was hijacked. Ordinarily, I'd leave a note about it to the contributor who hijacked it, but since this was an IP and it was some time back, there's probably no point. If either of these subjects were longer, it might be worth splitting them out, but it's hard to know, when neither of them has much text or is sourced. Thanks for salvaging that removed information. :) If you ever encounter a situation like that again and want help splitting it out, please feel free to drop me a note at my talk page, and I'll give you a hand. It's not really difficult--we just have to note in our edit summary where the material came from and also make a "null" edit with an edit summary at the source article--but I myself often like to see processes that are new to me demonstrated before I try them out. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:25, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Austin (tennis)

Good find : ), Fixed. Regards — Badgernet ^Talk 10:16, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

uncat

I recently saw you tagging articles as uncat. Couldn't you just catagorize them yourself? ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 03:45, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Uncat

Wouldn't it be better to have a bot drop tags on pages, while us humans focus on cating them? ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 04:00, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily. I'm adding a request at WP:BOTREQ. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 04:07, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chase Coy

Thank you for your edits to my Chase Coy page! If there is anything else you can do to help me I would really appreciate it! The page is in danger of being deleted!

(XoxJoshGxox (talk) 20:02, 16 January 2009 (UTC))[reply]

How do i request for a cleanup or non-delete of Gpirate

Please do not delete Gpirate —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jinjajames (talk • contribs) 22:46, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of airlines of Ontario

Thank you for your help on List of airlines of Ontario...for adding categories: Transportation in Ontario and Airline related lists.

Whenaxis (talk) 12:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Dear T@nn,

I noticed that you added a Categories section to Nelson Antonio Denis.

It looks great, is highly functional, and I really appreciate it!

Thanks,

MBernal615 (talk) 09:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Behavioral psychologists

Category:Behavioral psychologists, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 05:43, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious.

Why are you moving reflists to the bottom of articles in contravention of wp:layout? Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 14:13, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If I don't the references don't show up and the broken references categories don't go away.T@nn (talk) 14:49, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Was that a problem with, for example, Eau Claire, Wisconsin? (By the way, what is a "broken reference category"?) Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 21:11, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The category is called "Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting" and it is a hidden category that is populated with, for example, pages that has, in red at the bottom,

"ref tags exist, but no references tag was found". I've been trying to help with the backlog of articles in that category and, I have to admit, I'm not as experienced an editor as I should be. I'll make sure to comment out (or move) the references below the reflists instead.

A similar issue.

Hi-your moving of the reflist to below the various Wisconsin county navigational boxes -the Wisconsin county templates is getting confusing.This looks like the reflist section is cut off from the rest of the article with the template in the way.Please see also the Political subdivisions of Wisconsin article. Thanks-RFD (talk) 16:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Placement of references section

Please see MOS:APPENDIX. The references section should not go at the end of the article. older ≠ wiser 23:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aha, there is apparently a bug here. The problem is caused by ref tags placed after the references section. See this thread on VP(T). Personally I would recommend commenting out the malplaced ref tag until the bug is fixed rather than moving the references section. older ≠ wiser 00:07, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Paranormal writers

Category:Paranormal writers, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 18:22, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Taxonomers

Category:Taxonomers, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 08:37, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hands Off the People of Iran

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hands Off the People of Iran, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Notability/Verifiability; written in the prose of an activist pamphlet

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 'uSgheb (talk • contribs) 23:28, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, ignore that notice, the article only just survived an AfD discussion, so it can't be prodded. Fences&Windows 00:35, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Online newspapers

Redundant disambiguation pages

Ciao, T@nn, I just move-deleted Grahame Davies as you requested per PROD. Just to let you know, in future you can simply use {{db-move}} and have such pages speedily deleted. Cheers, Skomorokh 16:22, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments lost

Hi, I'm not sure what happened here but you seem to have deleted a number of comments so I reverted it. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:30, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Businesspeople in media

Category:Businesspeople in media, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:45, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adam Crosland for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Adam Crosland, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Crosland until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Anneyh (talk) 20:16, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Symbiotic variables

Category:Symbiotic variables, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 19:40, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Businesspeople in the insurance industry

Category:Businesspeople in the insurance industry, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 15:36, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Geometry educators

Category:Geometry educators, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Legend of Zorro 21:02, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Technologists

Category:Technologists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 16:59, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Faculty by university in New Zealand

Category:Faculty by university in New Zealand, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:49, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pop singer-songwriters

Category:Pop singer-songwriters, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 06:54, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rhythm and blues singer-songwriters

Category:Rhythm and blues singer-songwriters, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 06:58, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chione (daughter of Daedalion) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chione (daughter of Daedalion) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chione (daughter of Daedalion) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nyctimene (talk) 11:11, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Archaeological writers has been nominated for discussion

Category:Archaeological writers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Joe Roe (talk) 00:44, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Archaeology educators has been nominated for discussion

Category:Archaeology educators, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Joe Roe (talk) 01:02, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Om (Vedic: the primary sound; the one indestructable thing or syllable) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Om (Vedic: the primary sound; the one indestructable thing or syllable). Since you had some involvement with the Om (Vedic: the primary sound; the one indestructable thing or syllable) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:41, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ningirama

The article Ningirama has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Extremely minor deity about whom I cannot find any sources aside from the single one cited. One three-line entry in an encyclopedia of gods is not enough to justify having an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 13:11, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Political analysts has been nominated for discussion

Category:Political analysts, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 07:26, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hospital administrators has been nominated for discussion

Category:Hospital administrators, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 08:40, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Faculty by university in New Zealand has been nominated for discussion

Category:Faculty by university in New Zealand, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:15, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Kurdish radio personalities

A tag has been placed on Category:Kurdish radio personalities requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:38, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ukur for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ukur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ukur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:33, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Martin W. Kellogg

The article Martin W. Kellogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN artist, tagged for over a decade. I can't find anything on Google books, news, or newspapers about this artist. Only cite is a dead link.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 20:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Flemish theologians has been nominated for deletion

Category:Flemish theologians has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 12:37, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:University of Notre Dame faculty has been nominated for merging

Category:University of Notre Dame faculty has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 06:06, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Persian physicians has been nominated for merging

Category:Persian physicians has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 12:19, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Linguistics educators has been nominated for merging

Category:Linguistics educators has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. MalignantMouse (talk) 17:38, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Khipa

The article Khipa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

double of the page Ḫepat (Khipa is the spelling attested in names such as Tadukhipa), lack of inline citations, implausible unsourced speculation

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

Endursaga

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hani (god)

The article Hani (god) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no deity named "Hani" was associated with Adad, this is an incorrect spelling of the name Hanish, which is covered on the page Shullat and Hanish since these two gods are always treated as a pair or even a single deity with a double name in scholarship.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:History teachers has been nominated for deletion

Category:History teachers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:21, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Enshag

The article Enshag has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary double of the page Inzak using an antiquated spelling of a variant form of the name.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Sonic the Hedgehog (synd)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sonic the Hedgehog (synd) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 12#Sonic the Hedgehog (synd) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 16:50, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cultural critics has been nominated for deletion

Category:Cultural critics has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - car chasm (talk) 19:32, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gerra (god)

The article Gerra (god) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary double of the page Gibil, incorrect spelling of a variant name (Girra), interchangeability is confirmed by multiple sources cited on the Gibil page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nintulla

The article Nintulla has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of notability: a deity named Ninutul(l)a is documented in literature in but evidence is limited to a single uncertain restoration. The only source given here is an unreliable fringe website hosting outdated translations of ancient texts next to parapsychology; modern credible translations consistently refer to Meskilak as the deity mentioned in the described passage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Crafts deities has been nominated for renaming

Category:Crafts deities has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PepperBeast (talk) 16:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sesame Street crew has been nominated for deletion

Category:Sesame Street crew has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --wooden superman 09:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"R. Tucker" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect R. Tucker has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 30 § R. Tucker until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Classical guitar makers has been nominated for merging

Category:Classical guitar makers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:20, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]