User talk:Swedenwish

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Swedenwish, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

January 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Opencooper. An edit that you recently made to Amélie seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Opencooper (talk) 14:49, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop[edit]

You should not be adding protection templates to article that are not protected. That can only by done my admins who have protected the page. Your other tags are also suspect - Amélie is clearly NOT a stub article. Your changes to various hatnotes is also against the policy and guidelines regarding their usage. If you continue editing like this it will be considered WP:DISRUPTIVE for which you can be blocked. Your cooperation will be appreciated. MarnetteD|Talk 01:38, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Fire iron. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. MarnetteD|Talk 03:09, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Categorisation[edit]

Please read WP:SUBCAT and realise that we don't add a parent category if an article is already in a subcategory. --David Biddulph (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Shorts. Jim1138 (talk) 08:08, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop breaking things[edit]

When you click "Save page", it immediately goes "live". If your edit breaks something, it shows up immediately. Test your edits by clicking on "Preview", check your work, then click "Save page". If a link is red, it isn't working, so fix it before you save. Remember to leave an wp:edit summary so that others understand the purpose of your edit. Jim1138 (talk) 08:58, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Let's Blow This Popsicle Stand[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Let's Blow This Popsicle Stand requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --allthefoxes ^(Talk) 02:01, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jan 2016[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Hating Kapatid. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. MarnetteD|Talk 04:47, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sampaguita. MarnetteD|Talk 04:56, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:18, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Block as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Synthelabobabe21 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. 112.198.68.86 (talk)