User talk:Sukh09

Welcome!

Hello, Sukh09, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Bakugan Battle Brawlers: The Movie, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MikeWazowski (talk) 15:47, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bakugan Battle Brawlers: The Movie

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Bakugan Battle Brawlers: The Movie, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MikeWazowski (talk) 15:47, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jogiya

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jogiya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:54, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mangi Mahal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mangi Mahal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MikeWazowski (talk) 17:44, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! Stop by the Teahouse anytime!

Hello! Sukh09, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! SarahStierch (talk) 20:14, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Benny Dhaliwal

The article Benny Dhaliwal has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SwisterTwister talk 23:00, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Soni Pabla with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Rcsprinter (rap) 16:14, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jogiya, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:07, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you believe you have reason to remove the "Notability" tag from the article, please explain it on the article's Talk page -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:07, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Benny Dhaliwal

The article Benny Dhaliwal has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 01:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Harjit Harman. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 22:44, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:44, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jogiya, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Please stop removing the "notability" tag from Jogiya, without discussing it first on the article's Talk page. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:12, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for repeatedly removing maintenance/BLP PROD templates. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:28, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How many times have you been told to stop removing maintenance templates from articles without fixing the reasons for their presence? All biographical articles of living people must have at least one reference to a reliable source, as it says quite plainly in the BLP PROD notice at Benny Dhaliwal, so you must not remove it without providing such a source. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:31, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You also removed the "unsourced" notice from Gal Sun Ho Gaya without providing a source, and the "primary sources" notice from Jaidev Kumar without providing secondary sources. If you do this again after this current block expires, you should expect to be blocked for longer, possibly indefinitely. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:36, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And looking back on your earlier edits, I see more removals of maintenance templates without addressing the reasons they were there - I will now put them all back again. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:38, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 16:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Message sent with Global message delivery.

Proposed deletion of Preet Harpal

The article Preet Harpal has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Scopecreep (talk) 11:58, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you remove Biographies of Living Persons prods without addressing the issue, as you did at Preet Harpal, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Scopecreep (talk) 12:22, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roshan Prince

The article Roshan Prince has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Scopecreep (talk) 12:26, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yudhvir Manak

The article Yudhvir Manak has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Scopecreep (talk) 12:27, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently removing maintenance templates, as you did at Preet Harpal. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TerriersFan (talk) 13:52, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Amrinder Gill, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 17:42, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Minecraft Di Flash

The article Minecraft Di Flash has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I could not find any hits for "Minecraft Di Flash". It could be a hoax, or perhaps it's just too soon for an article. Either way, I failed to find sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:35, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Minecraft Di Flash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Minecraft Di Flash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minecraft Di Flash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:53, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Va Vai Va

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Va Vai Va requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Comatmebro ^{~Come at me~} 00:25, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Irada–The Character Comedy

The article Irada–The Character Comedy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable and not even released yet.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Comatmebro ^{~Come at me~} 00:27, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 008 (Punjabi Film)

The article 008 (Punjabi Film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mdann52 (talk) 15:47, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 008 (Punjabi Film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 008 (Punjabi Film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/008 (Punjabi Film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mdann52 (talk) 15:52, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

K.S. Makhan

You recently made edits to K.S. Makhan, which put an Articles For Deletion template on it, but in such a way that did not create an Articles For Deletion discussion, but rather linked it to an existing discussion for another article (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/008 (Punjabi Film)) I have deleted this from the Makhan article.

If you intended to start a deletion discussion for the Makhan article, let me know, and I will help you with the process. --Nat Gertler (talk) 14:38, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent articles

Considering that you've been having troubles with your recent articles, I suggest visiting Wikipedia:Writing better articles before starting new articles. Familiarising yourself with the guidelines will help prevent deletion notifications. If you need additional help, contact me at my talk page. SwisterTwister talk 04:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vikram Singh Dhillon

Hello, Sukh09, and thank you for your contributions!

I wanted to let you know it seems an article you worked on, Vikram Singh Dhillon, is copied from another Wikipedia page, Vikram Dhillon. It's fine to do this as long as you provide the following information in the edit summary:

a link to the article you copied from
the date you copied it

You can do this now by editing the page, making any minor edit to the article, and adding the above information into the edit summary.

If you're still not sure how to fix the problem, please leave a message at the help desk. It's possible that I made a mistake, so feel free to remove the tag I placed on the article.

Thanks again for helping build the free encyclopedia! CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:29, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jay Status

The article Jay Status has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence that this matches a criterion of WP:MUSICBIO

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hekerui (talk) 08:45, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Jatt Di Cadbury. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 14:55, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Jatt Di Cadbury. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 11:08, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD templates while the AfD discussion is continuing is extremely disruptive and will result with a block. Rather than removing the templates, consider improving the article such as gathering reliable sources to verify the content. Visiting Wikipedia:Writing better articles may also be useful. SwisterTwister talk 21:28, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Hello, I'm Noosentaal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to List of Indian Punjabi films, because it didn't appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Noosentaal^·talk· 12:21, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. When you recently edited Gurpreet Ghuggi, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lofty and Naughty (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:47, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Benny Dhaliwal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Benny Dhaliwal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benny Dhaliwal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SwisterTwister talk 05:52, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Benny Dhaliwal, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Lone boatman (talk) 09:34, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dev Dhillon

The article Dev Dhillon has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 20:34, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Punjab Bolda

Thanks for creating Punjab Bolda, Sukh09!

Wikipedia editor Kieranian2001 has tagged the page as having some issues to fix. In addition, they wrote this note for you:

reviewed needs additional references

The tags on the page can be removed by you or another editor when the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on Kieranian2001's talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Roshan Prince, Sukh09!

Wikipedia editor Basalisk just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

More references are needed. Also, please avoid using the subject's website as a reference. It's not reliable.

To reply, leave a comment on Basalisk's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

MovieBox Records

Proposed deletion of MovieBox Records

The article MovieBox Records has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vigyani (talk) 01:30, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yaraan Naal Baharaan 2

The article Yaraan Naal Baharaan 2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Film with no refs at all and no notability either

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 02:32, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Akh Labdi

The article Akh Labdi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Film with no notability or references at all

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 02:34, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Trakkiyan

The article Trakkiyan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims of notability, fails WP:NALBUMS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 13:15, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vaari Vaari

The article Vaari Vaari has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims of passing WP:NALBUM made.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:10, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Surjit Khan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Surjit Khan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drmies (talk) 18:35, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Punjab Bolda

The article Punjab Bolda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non notable film with no reliable citations found in a WP:BEFORE. Tagged since 2015.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:35, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jatt Romantic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jatt Romantic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jatt Romantic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Heba Aisha (talk) 20:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gal Sun Ho Gaya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gal Sun Ho Gaya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gal Sun Ho Gaya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kolma8 (talk) 16:47, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daljit Singh Baath for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daljit Singh Baath is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daljit Singh Baath until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kolma8 (talk) 16:54, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lagda Ishq Hogaya

The article Lagda Ishq Hogaya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search to help it pass WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 17:27, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Saadi Love Story

The article Saadi Love Story has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search to help it pass WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 17:29, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Desi Rockstar

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Desi Rockstar, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Toadspike (talk) 15:43, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Meri Chargay Jawani Sohniyeh

The article Meri Chargay Jawani Sohniyeh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable reviews/sources. Nothing found in a WP:Before.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DareshMohan (talk) 02:43, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]