User talk:SugiyonoWongTegal

Speedy deletion nomination of Serayu Train[edit]

Hello SugiyonoWongTegal,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Serayu Train for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Xx236 (talk) 08:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anarchyte was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:SugiyonoWongTegal/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:51, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! SugiyonoWongTegal, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:51, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Serayu (June 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Majora was:

The target location for this draft is already taken by a redirect [1]. Please edit that redirect and add the information there. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Serayu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Majora (talk) 23:30, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Serayu[edit]

Hello, SugiyonoWongTegal. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Serayu".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 00:29, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm XtraJovial. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tokyu 8500 series, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 16:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't include material that is based solely on individually published photographs, videos, or forum discussion posts; these are not reliable sources and should not be included on Wikipedia, and material that is supported by such sources could be considered original research if no reliable sources exist for them. Issues regarding sourcing and original research are very prevalent on train-related articles, and we should be trying to mitigate the sourcing issue. Thank you. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 20:07, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Tokyo Metro 05 series, you may be blocked from editing. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 19:14, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi XtraJovial, thank you for contacting me.

Initially I wanted to cite Grafik Perjalanan Kereta Api/Train Travel Charts (GAPEKA) book however it doesn't specify the specific EMU type as the stocks are almost always swapped on a day-to-day basis despite them carrying the same schedule number on the books.

I don't think it is that necessary to provide source for such miniscular information, you see even the other routes on the Tokyo Metro 05 does not even include citations, even on the Indonesian Wikipedia, the routes I added wasn't sourced either.

It's all common sense, I don't think we should bloat the infobox with too much unecessary citations.

Also not to mention that searching a good reliable source for Indonesian railway stuff in-depth is rather rate, except ReDigest.

Sincerely, SugiyonoWongTegal (talk) 10:19, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If no reliable sources exist for the material you're adding, you are adding original research, and that is a violation of Wikipedia's no original research policy and potentially its verifiability policy as well. Unsourced content on a foreign-language Wikipedia does not excuse unsourced content on the English Wikipedia. Citing reliable sources is primarily for the benefit of the reader so they can verify the material included in an article. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 13:48, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]