User talk:Subtopic256

Deletion[edit]

The Vagsbygd High School delete. --188.32.110.144 (talk) 18:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kolsåsen[edit]

The article Kolsåsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It's not clear that this neighbourhood exists: the reference doesn't give a result, and a Google search doesn't show much.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Slashme (talk) 18:09, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kronprinsens gate[edit]

The article Kronprinsens gate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It's not clear that this street exists: the references don't mention it, and a Google search doesn't show much.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 07:23, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Subtopic256. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! NeemNarduni2 (talk) 09:50, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Holbergs gate[edit]

The article Holbergs gate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 13:37, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rådhusgata[edit]

The article Rådhusgata has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 13:38, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gyldeløves gate[edit]

The article Gyldeløves gate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 13:39, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Skippergata[edit]

The article Skippergata has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 13:39, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elvegata[edit]

The article Elvegata has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 14:04, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kristian IVs gate[edit]

The article Kristian IVs gate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 14:04, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent articles[edit]

Hello, and thanks for your work on the geography of Kristiansand. However, you've been creating a lot of short articles about roads, each with two references that don't mention the subject, and with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD. May I ask you to please slow down, and spend some time improving one article at a time? Please ask at my talk page if you'd like any help with this. Thanks, NeemNarduni2 (talk) 14:08, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Odins gate[edit]

The article Odins gate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 14:28, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fritz Jensens gate[edit]

The article Fritz Jensens gate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 10:22, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Østre Strandgate[edit]

The article Østre Strandgate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 10:24, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vollgata[edit]

The article Vollgata has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 16:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fjellgata[edit]

The article Fjellgata has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 16:55, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gyldenløves gate[edit]

The article Gyldenløves gate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 16:56, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stener Heyerdahls gate[edit]

The article Stener Heyerdahls gate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 16:56, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Odins gate for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Odins gate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odins gate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:59, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Østre Strandgate for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Østre Strandgate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Østre Strandgate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:04, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elvegata for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elvegata is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elvegata until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PamD 17:55, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Skippergata[edit]

Hello! You cannot just wipe the entry clean of all warnings... Do better than that!!Super48paul (talk)

Nomination of Vollgata for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vollgata is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vollgata until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PamD 17:21, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rådhusgata for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rådhusgata is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rådhusgata until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tordenskjolds gate for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tordenskjolds gate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tordenskjolds gate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:40, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kronprinsens gate for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kronprinsens gate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kronprinsens gate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:41, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kongens gate for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kongens gate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kongens gate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kristian IVs gate for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kristian IVs gate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristian IVs gate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gyldenløves gate for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gyldenløves gate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gyldenløves gate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fritz Jensens gate for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fritz Jensens gate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fritz Jensens gate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:55, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fjellgata for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fjellgata is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fjellgata until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:55, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Havstad112, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

NordicDragon Talkpage 08:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grim (Kristiansand), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ravnedalen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]