User talk:Subhamrony

You have been blocked for 31 hours for deliberate negative edits to John Dalton, Charles Dickens, and John Milton. If you go on in this way, you can expect a longer block. Charles Matthews (talk) 10:33, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John Dalton, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John Dalton was changed by Subhamrony (u) (t) deleting 28950 characters on 2009-07-04T18:41:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:41, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make test edits to articles, as you did with this edit to Sukumar Ray, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits constitute vandalism, and will be reverted. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. → Dylan 620 (Toolbox Alpha, Beta) 18:50, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. ^.`^) Paine Ellsworth ^diss`cuss (^^`. 05:26, 5 July 2009 (UTC) (Ref.: Isaac Newton article.)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Isaac Newton, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ^.`^) Paine Ellsworth ^diss`cuss (^^`. 10:47, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems[edit]

Your files File:Thomas alva edison.jpg, File:Thomas alva edison.jpeg, File:SatyajitRay.jpg, File:Dev Anand.jpg, File:Mehmood.jpeg, File:Kishore kumar.jpg, File:Ian fleming0802.jpg, File:Ian fleming0802.jpg, File:Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay.jpg, File:3CUMQ0CA7OSXRZCAS2YVYUCAIHJGOOCAOV468QCASOX2RZCAXN8NNZCA4SD7EPCA4G1SU6CA7QN4YOCAX86H72CAE381WNCA50I0HQCAVLX1UUCAMWYC76CAMJGSFPCAAQUHAECAYK8GVPCA2B9NI2.jpg, File:Johnny1.jpg, File:Amitabh bachchan.jpeg, File:E. C. Segar.jpeg, File:Vladimir Ilyich Lenin.jpeg, File:Rudyard kipling.jpeg, File:Imagewilliam herschel.jpg, File:Image william herschel.jpg, File:Charles Dickens.jpeg were nominated for deletion. Hekerui (talk) 18:57, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Amitabh Bachchan.jpeg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Amitabh Bachchan.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:36, 16 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.104.182 (talk) 01:36, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Charlie Chaplin.jpeg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Charlie Chaplin.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 02:56, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Charlie Chaplin.jpeg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Charlie Chaplin.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:56, 16 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 02:56, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Abanindranath tagore.jpeg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Abanindranath tagore.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 02:59, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Abanindranath tagore.jpeg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Abanindranath tagore.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:00, 16 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 03:00, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Dev anand.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Dev anand.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 03:05, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dev anand.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Dev anand.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor (talk) 03:05, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Charles Dickens, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Broke the link to the image I see that you have now filled the empty link. Old Moonraker (talk) 07:47, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about jumping to conclusions there. However the new edit, now fixed, isn't representative of the article's subject. What about putting it in "Early life" section?--Old Moonraker (talk) 07:55, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Rls-pc2.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Rls-pc2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY ^(TALK) 09:06, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Rls-pc3.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Rls-pc3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY ^(TALK) 09:07, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Charles Dickens .jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Charles Dickens .jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY ^(TALK) 09:08, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Billy Betcher.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Billy Betcher.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY ^(TALK) 09:11, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Walt disney.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Walt disney.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY ^(TALK) 09:12, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Roy O. Disney.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Roy O. Disney.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY ^(TALK) 09:13, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Roy O. Disney1.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Roy O. Disney1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY ^(TALK) 09:14, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Sir Walter Scott.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Sir Walter Scott.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY ^(TALK) 09:14, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Walt disney portrait.jpeg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Walt disney portrait.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stephenb (Talk) 19:40, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Bob Kane.jpeg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Bob Kane.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 05:27, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:300px-KaestnerErich.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:300px-KaestnerErich.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 14:02, 22 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Deor (talk) 14:02, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:KaestnerBild.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:KaestnerBild.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 14:03, 22 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Deor (talk) 14:03, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Erick Kastner.jpeg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Erick Kastner.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 14:05, 22 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Deor (talk) 14:05, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Segar.jpeg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Segar.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 14:09, 22 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Deor (talk) 14:09, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rls-pc1.jpeg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Rls-pc1.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Deor (talk) 14:15, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rls-pc2.jpeg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Rls-pc2.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Deor (talk) 14:18, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Rls-pc3.jpeg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Rls-pc3.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 14:21, 22 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Deor (talk) 14:21, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:SatyajitRay.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:SatyajitRay.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 14:23, 22 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Deor (talk) 14:23, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Tagore4.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Tagore4.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 14:25, 22 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Deor (talk) 14:25, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:E-R-Burroughs.jpeg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:E-R-Burroughs.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 14:27, 22 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Deor (talk) 14:27, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AN discussion[edit]

Note that you are the subject of a discussion at the Administrators' noticeboard. Deor (talk) 15:27, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image problems[edit]

As you can see, there have been problems with a lot of the images you have uploaded. This is because you haven't added the image copyrights to the pages. Such images may be deleted by an administrator at any time. To find out how to fix this problem, this page is a good one to start with. Please do not upload any more images until existing problems have been fixed, or you may find yourself blocked from editing. Thanks, Black Kite 10:08, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Amitabh bachchan.jpeg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Amitabh bachchan.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. [midnight comet] [talk] 13:51, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

As you have continued to upload photographs with no copyright information and edit in the same manner as before, I have blocked you from editing. If you state that you understand why this is and understand that you should not continue, you may be unblocked. This should be done using {{unblock|your statement}}. Black Kite 21:42, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]