User talk:Storieblu

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Storieblu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Blinding Lights does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 17:12, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at After Hours (The Weeknd album). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 17:43, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If the "association" is not discussed in the article, it is not both "significant and notable to this artist's career" as is stated in the template's documentation (template:Infobox musical artist#associated acts). Either make it clear in the article how it's both significant and notable to this artist's career or stop adding it to the infobox. And yes, copyright violations are a problem too, but those can get you blocked. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:27, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The association is mentioned in multiple places in the article. Storieblu (talk) 18:28, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

He is a major collaborator even a google search will inform you that Storieblu (talk) 18:29, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Twelve songs Storieblu (talk) 18:30, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I will refrain from vandalism Storieblu (talk) 18:30, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone tell Walter to properly read the article and The Weeknd’s: pages because max Martin is a major collaborator. Some of the others on that article are minor in comparison. Storieblu (talk) 18:33, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Martin" is only listed once. I am not vandalizing. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:36, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at The Weeknd shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:37, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Save Your Tears (The Weeknd Song)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Save Your Tears (The Weeknd Song), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.   Kadzi   (talk) 11:39, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Save Your Tears (The Weeknd Song)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Save Your Tears (The Weeknd Song). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Save Your Tears. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Save Your Tears. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.   Kadzi   (talk) 11:40, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Save Your Tears, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Hughes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:43, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited In Your Eyes (The Weeknd song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Starboy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warring[edit]

Do not restore your editing by using multiple accounts. If you continue to do that, I will report you to an administrator. Insider Inc. is not an reliable source, which is why I remove it. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 03:20, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Prahlad balaji. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of most-streamed songs on Spotify, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 16:06, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 12[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Savage Love (Laxed – Siren Beat), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pasifika (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Blinding Lights. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Just because you think it is 171 BPM does not mean that it is. Check the sources cited. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 14:16, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hardest to Love[edit]

Hello, Storieblu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hardest to Love".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021[edit]

Your recent editing history at Blinding Lights shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 07:43, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Partial block on Blinding Lights[edit]

You have been blocked from editing Blinding Lights for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:34, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to The Weeknd, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:

If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. Walter Görlitz (talk) 11:06, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ss112. I noticed that you made one or more edits to an article, Save Your Tears, concerning the updates of review statistics, box office numbers, sports statistics, or some other frequently updated data with a fixed web address, but you did not update the |access-date= parameter in the citation template. The |access-date= parameter is the full date when the content pointed to by the URL was last verified to be working and supporting the text being cited in the article. This means that the parameter needs to be updated whenever the content is updated. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ss112 19:57, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Save Your Tears has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Referring to this edit: [1] Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 11:46, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect Pop Songs peaks[edit]

Hi. Maybe try not to update Billboard peaks hours before the archives actually update in future, because this was incorrect. "Save Your Tears" is number 6 on the Mainstream Top 40 this week, not number 5. I don't know if that was just a typo, but you shouldn't be adding or changing content hours before it shows at the link provided anyway per WP:V. Thanks. Ss112 19:53, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As I have asked you previously, do not update Billboard peaks before the website updates without a reliable external source. You are updating them hours in advance and they have not always been correct. Please stop. Ss112 17:26, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021[edit]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Muhandes (talk) 13:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Save Your Tears, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ss112 17:26, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Save Your Tears, you may be blocked from editing. Ss112 13:51, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Billboard Adult Contemporary number ones of 2021. Ss112 12:13, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah sorry will do Storieblu (talk) 13:02, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Right before replying this, you updated several articles related to Max Martin scoring another number one song in the US when Billboard has not made that official yet. You are being reported for repeated addition of unsourced material. Ss112 14:03, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright that’ll be the last time, I apologize Storieblu (talk) 14:16, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Once the source material does update, May I edit the page? Storieblu (talk) 14:18, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! -- dylx 13:15, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Blinding Lights. I see you were warned multiple times about edit warring and about leaving edit summaries. Please stop. Muhandes (talk) 16:04, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to join the discussion at Template talk:Certification Table Entry. For now the type of edit you are trying to do is not supported by the template and is considered unsourced material, which you were warned multiple times about. --Muhandes (talk) 16:05, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your bold edits at Dawn FM[edit]

Stop restoring links for Rolling Stone and Variety in the critical reception, they already linked in the background section, a link should appear only once in an article not twice (see WP:REPEATLINK). TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 20:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]