User talk:Stodieck
This page is closed due to abuse.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Stodieck. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Stodieck. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Monadnock Building
[edit]Please feel free to write an article about the Monadnock Building (San Francisco), and then maybe we can figure out how to disambiguate it. Simply dumping a parenthetical statement about a subject without an article into the lead paragraph of an article (a featured article at that) isn't how it's done. If an article exists, we can provide a hatnote leading to the other one. Acroterion (talk) 22:17, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Stodieck. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
December 2018
[edit]Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cabo de Hornos, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ‑‑V.S.(C)(T) 14:44, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Cabo de Hornos
[edit]You wrote "This redirect make it impossible to have an article in Spanish about two locations called "Cabo de Hornos". What were you thinking?" in the edit summary for this edit. What happens in the Spanish article has nothing to do with what happens here. If there are two places called "Cabo de Hornos", you can turn the article into a disambiguation article, but please don't just blank the article. --Slashme (talk) 15:06, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 28
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of pumped-storage hydroelectric power stations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Storage capacity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Mirai photo
[edit]Thank you for your contribution to Toyota Mirai. As per WP:CARPIX, there is no such thing as an obsolete photo - any version or generation of that vehicle is a valid candidate for the lead image because the article covers the entire history of the vehicle - not just the latest. However, we do try to avoid using the same photo twice in the same article. In this case, your photo is used as the main image in the 2nd generation infobox. Using the same photo as the lead image and also as the main image for a generation infobox is consider overuse of that image. Stepho talk 23:53, 18 July 2021 (UTC)