User talk:Statekidnap

Berfore you make any more edits, please could you read Wikipedia's policies on Neutral Point of View and verifiability? We cannot keep content that is not adequately sourced, and without suitable sourcing for its assertions, your article is likely to be deleted as original research.

To fix this, you need to add citations to reliable sources that back up the assertions in your article.

You should also read Wikipedia's biography of living persons policy. -- The Anome (talk) 16:53, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Forced adoption in the UK for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Forced adoption in the UK is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forced adoption in the UK until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- The Anome (talk) 17:00, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am providing citations. Do not delete the article. If you feel it is biased then provide examples.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Statekidnap (talk • contribs)

Don't worry, we're not deleting it straight away: the AfD process takes about a week. -- The Anome (talk) 17:09, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. It also appears that your account is intended to be used for the purpose of telling the world about an organization or cause that you consider worthwhile. Unfortunately, many good causes are not sufficiently notable for their own Wikipedia article, and all users are discouraged from editing in any area where they have an inherent conflict of interest. You may wish to consider one of these alternative outlets.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you.

Daniel Case (talk) 17:05, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]