User talk:Stanning

This user may have left Wikipedia. Stanning has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

HMS Stork

Hello! This article may not have the correct title, I would have thought it should be HMS Stork (disambiguation) the same as HMS Beagle (disambiguation). Danrok (talk) 16:22, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Beagle (disambiguation) - and a very few others like HMS Victory (disambiguation) - are exceptions because of the high notability of one of the set. Those pages, and HMS Stork and scores of similar pages, are not in fact disambiguation pages but set index articles. Take a look at Category:Set indices on ships.
Stanning 16:42, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Heads of Mission of the United Kingdom

Saw your comment on the talk page for this entry, and totally agree this is lamentable at present. Your suggestion to make the updates automatic looks like the way to go, and I'll give it a try, starting with the entries that I can spot are out of date. But I'm still a newbie, so do take a look to make sure I'm not making things worse!Hyegyong (talk) 18:47, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help! Stanning (talk) 21:42, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Michael Aron) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Michael Aron, Stanning!

Wikipedia editor Carriearchdale just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you!

To reply, leave a comment on Carriearchdale's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Sir John Addis

I note that you created the entry of Sir John Addis in November 2013 and an obituary from the Times was used as one of the supporting sources. Recently, I've been planning to expand Sir John's entry in the Chinese Wikipedia but I have not been able to find the Times' obituary in my Proquest 5000 data base. As such, I should be most grateful if you can kindly send a copy of the obituary to my email address at [email protected] purely for my internal reference and research purpose. Sorry for bothering you!. --Clithering (talk) 07:20, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Clithering: No problem. I sent you email with obituary attached. Stanning (talk) 10:48, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to let you know that the biographical entry of Sir John Addis in the Chinese Wikipedia has been completed (please refer to 艾惕思). It would not have been completed without your kind assistance in providing me the important pieces of reference materials. Thank you very much. --Clithering (talk) 06:58, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Clithering: Well done. You're welcome! Stanning (talk) 14:43, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Andre Doyle

Thank you so much for expanding the biography that I started on Brian Andre Doyle. I was just about tearing my hair out trying to find information about him! I'm so glad you've been able to come up with the dates and places of his birth and death, etc! David Cannon (talk) 10:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidcannon: No problem. I'm in the UK, where it's easy to access biographical data for notable British people such as Doyle because public libraries hold copies of Who's Who and, for really notable people, the Dictionary of National Biography. Both are also available on-line with a UK public library membership. But I see that you're based in New Zealand, so access may not be so easy! Doyle, though, is in the International Who's Who which looks to be a useful resource. Stanning (talk) 20:44, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MOS

Sorry. The proper formatting style for lists of women nobles who are knighted (i.e. granted a damehood of some kind, i.e. DBE, GBE, DCB, DCMG, DCVO, GCVO) is as follows, for examples:

Quis separabit? 22:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@[email protected]: Hmmm. Interesting. Thank you. Stanning (talk) 06:30, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

George or Richard?

Are you sure that Lord Nugent was more commonly referred to as Richard rather than George? My own, admittedly very fallible memory, suggests that when he was MP for my constituency some half a century ago, the local paper - The Surrey Advertiser - always referred to him as George. JH (talk page) 21:07, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jhall1: As sure as I can be from the sources. His first name was George, of course, so that in official documents where his name is given in full, he's "George Richard Hodges Nugent". But otherwise, he's called Richard Nugent. There are two links from the Wikipedia article: Hansard, and the Independent's obituary, which actually calls him "Dick Nugent". Google search for him is difficult, because there's someone called Sir Richard Nugent O'Connor who gets in the way, but if you search for "Sir Richard Nugent" -O'Connor you find a few references. But if you're in the UK and have a card for your local public library, you can search the Times online archive and find dozens of mentions of Mr Richard Nugent, and later Sir Richard Nugent, as MP for Guildford. — Stanning (talk) 08:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That seems pretty conclusive. JH (talk page) 09:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying licensed material requires proper attribution

It appears that you have added material to the article Interception of Communications Commissioner using content from a UK Government website. While you are welcome to re-use licensed content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying from other compatibly-licensed websites, please at minimum mention in an edit summary at the new page where you got the content. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied licensed material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please go back and provide attribution. Let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 20:20, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Who's Who

Is there a Wikipedian subscription or does it have to be paid for off of your own steam? Who's Who HistoryAlight (talk) 09:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@HistoryAlight: There's no Wikipedian subscription that I know of. The online edition of Who's Who (UK) is published by Oxford University Press, but it's not available via WP:OUP.
If you're in the UK, it's easy. All you need is a card for your local public library, or an OpenAthens or Access Management Federation account from your university or institution, and you can log on for free at www.ukwhoswho.com. Who's Who is still in print and some reference libraries still carry the book. But if you're not in the UK, maybe the simplest way is to ask someone who is, such as me. Unless the people you're interested in died a long time ago – the 1920 edition of Who Was Who is out of copyright and is online at https://archive.org/details/whowaswhocompani01londuoft. — Stanning (talk) 14:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - yes I am in the United Kingdom so will check with St. Catherine's. 15:42, 3 November 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by HistoryAlight (talk • contribs)

@HistoryAlight: Oh, you're at Catz. OK, then www.ukwhoswho.com click "Login with Athens/Access Management Federation", on the next page select University of Oxford, then you can log on with your Oxford username and password. — Stanning (talk) 16:49, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help! HistoryAlight (talk) 17:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

French Algeria

Thank you for your knowledgeable comments with citations! France, till today, has been a transcontinental country - like Hawaii for the USA ;-)

Have a wonderful day! Henia Perlman (talk) 14:16, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join Women in Red

Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota.
You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap.
If you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, just 17.37% of English Wikipedia's biographies).

Our priorities for January:

Prisoners Fashion designers Geofocus: Great Britain and Ireland #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 15:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Stanning. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Richard Wildash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Wildash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Wildash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 12:04, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Dew (diplomat) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Dew (diplomat) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Dew (diplomat) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 09:50, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Moran (diplomat) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Moran (diplomat) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Moran (diplomat) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 07:24, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ian Whitting for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ian Whitting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Whitting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 22:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ian Hughes (diplomat)

The article Ian Hughes (diplomat) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No suitable non-primary sources. Fails WP:NBASIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 02:15, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]