Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User:SpoolWhippets/Cyril Clowes, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
On February 25, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Cyril Clowes, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Hi SpoolWhippets. Those maps you added to Arnold Potts are excellent additions. I'm not sure if you are looking for any other projects, but if you are there are many battle articles on Wikipedia that need maps. I have written a few articles about Australian battles in the Bougainville campaign: Battle of Slater's Knoll, Battle of Pearl Ridge, Battle of Hongorai River, Battle of Tsimba Ridge, and Battle of Porton Plantation. All of these would be greatly improved with maps, however, I am terrible at map drawing (my worst subject at Duntroon). If you were able to make some up and add them to those articles, it would be a great addition. No pressure, though, of course. The Potts article is coming along quite nicely, by the way. Good work. — AustralianRupert (talk) 23:40, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I'd be happy to do some location maps. I am planning to add a Boug. map to Potts, so once its done I can use that as a base for others. If you have some reference you would like me to use, just direct me to it. Or a list of anything you do and do not want included. I have been enjoying doing Potts but I'm looking forward to finishing as he's mopping up all my spare time at present. Boug. is half written. cheers SpoolWhippets (talk) 03:20, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again. A couple of refs that might be useful for the maps are as follows (they are all from the Official History, which can be found [1]) (incidentally chapters 8 and 9 both mention Potts a couple of times which might help you with Bougainville if you haven't already looked there):
Long 1963, p. 91 (chapter 5) - general Bougainville map
Long 1963, p. 116 (chapter 6) - Pearl Ridge
Long 1963, p. 123 & 125 (chapter 6) - Tsimba Ridge
Long 1963, p. 163 (chapter 7) - Slater's Knoll
Long 1963, p. 180 & 190 (chapter 8) - Hongorai
Long 1963, p. 207 (chapter 8) - Porton Plantation
I think also that Maitland, Gordon. (1999). The Second World War and its Australian Army Battle Honours also has a general map showing the main Australian engagements in Bougainville, but I don't have the source to hand at the moment.
Cheers once again. — AustralianRupert (talk) 05:41, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have just had a look at the Slater's Knoll map as an example. How do you feel about omitting the arrows? As an interested but not trained reader of mil. history, I always feel the text tells me what happened and the map is there to locate the multitude of place names that crop up. The arrows to me are superfluous. You might feel they are essential, and as you are the author I would be keen to tailor it to what you'd like.
Hi, again. No dramas from me. Sometimes the arrows can make the map a bit too cluttered and the text, I feel, at least does explain who went where and when. I'd be interested to see what you come up with. Incidentally, what program do you use to make them? I have been trying to put them together by hand, then scan and tweak in paint and they just look awful. — AustralianRupert (talk) 19:03, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm a graphic designer, so I have access to professional software which helps :) I have been using Adobe Fireworks, which is specifically for producing good looking web graphics in jpeg or png format. But it seems WP likes where possible to have files in SVG format that are editable. I am looking into the best way to make SVGs but my first efforts have been pretty bad. Might stick with Fireworks for now. BTW I am aiming where possible to produce a map that is useful and legible at the small size in the article (eg rotating the kokoda trail to get it running down the page). This won't always be possible, but that's what I'm going for. cheers SpoolWhippets (talk) 23:54, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Just a note to say that the work you have done on the Potts article is looking really good. For a new user you have already made some excellent contributions to Wikipedia. Have you considered becoming a member of WP:MILHIST? You can do this here if you are interested. BTW I too would like to express my admiration for your map making abilities... MILHIST could definitely use your skills it this department. Take it easy. ChoraPete (talk) 15:58, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks ChoraPete. I am really enjoying contributing and getting instant feedback from such a wide and well-informed readership. I have just joined MILHIST. I have a couple of maps to do for Potts and Clowes, then a few for AustralianRupert above. After that I'll be up for requests. I am on a mission to make small, clear maps that complement the article. Not so keen on the ones that try to be a substitute for reading - too many arrows, dates and unit patches etc. But I guess once I get further into it I might appreciate the necessity for that stuff. cheers SpoolWhippets (talk) 00:12, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The project has a stress hotline available for your use.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Kirill[talk][prof]05:45, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
For your excellent graphic contributions to the Military History project, particularly the creation of maps relating to the the Kokoda and Bougainville campaigns, I hereby award SpoolWhippets the Graphic Designer's Barnstar. Your contributions reflect the highest traditions of Wikipedia and bring great credit upon you, your project and the encyclopedia as a whole. AustralianRupert (talk) 13:12, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again. Not sure of your work load, but I was hoping you might please consider doing a map for Battle of Bita Paka (a battle between Australian and German forces in New Guinea during World War One)? The article currently has a map (which would serve as an excellent starting point), but it is not of great quality and one of your attractive maps would add greatly to this article about an obscure but interesting event in Australian military history. Cheers. ChoraPete (talk) 13:41, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'll add it to my worklist! I have been getting some grief from Tryphon☂ about sourcing for my maps. I would have thought a map entirely drawn by me would be OK for me to put in WikiCommons as Pub Domain, but he is requiring me to declare all my sources for the "data set" used. The only source cited for Bita_Paka_Map.JPG is "a book on new guinea". I suppose I will just cite Bita_Paka_Map.JPG and let him worry about it. SpoolWhippets (talk) 23:34, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I took a look at the map in question and I'd have thought it was cited well enough, but to be honest I'm not up on the Commons policy, sorry. Hopefully Tryphon will agree that you've cited it well enough and remove the tag. Sometimes the Commons policy is a bit more strict than WP policy on images. — AustralianRupert (talk) 00:13, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again, I have added the appropriate source information for the map now (from Google books). No rush for the map though. Cheers. ChoraPete (talk) 14:00, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for uploading File:Map nw bougainville 1945.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
Hey SpoolWhippets. I have added a licence to this image (similar to those on some of your other graphics). Hopefully this should sort out the issue. ChoraPete (talk) 08:21, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks ChoraPete, I appreciate it! When I finish one of these things I need to budget a bit more time for the upload/permissions process.
Hello, SpoolWhippets. You have new messages at Newm30's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I did mean to replace the png with a jpg but obviously the name should not have stayed the same. If you are able to rename it and maintain the link in the two pages that use it, I would really appreciate it. cheers SpoolWhippets (talk) 00:31, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Buzz - sure, no problem. Does it need to show any extra information? It looks to me like it could be a lot simpler, with much less detail in the map. cheers SpoolWhippets (talk) 04:45, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wow that was fast..all i am tying to show is 2 different migrations by 2 different genetic groups..made if you read this you might get what i am tring to show..and yes make it simpler if you wish..as you can tell i am not to good at maps, yet you seem to be an expert ....Moxy (talk) 04:50, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Buzz. I have not forgotten this job, but apologies I did not get it done when estimated. I'm not doing any WP stuff just for the time being, too busy, and its too cold in evenings in the room where we keep the computer. cheers SpoolWhippets (talk) 12:04, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)
The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:38, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Haven't seen you around for a bit. I hope you haven't been scared away. Your maps are really great additions IMO. If you are looking for more opportunities to get involved with content writing or review, there's plenty of work. The Australian military history task force maintains a list of articles that need creation or expansion. Also peer review always needs more contributors. Anyway, take it easy. Cheers. — AustralianRupert (talk) 16:55, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:03, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)
The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:42, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 20:30, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
G'day. I have recently started rewritting Battle of Coral-Balmoral and as part of this I have also attempted to do up some maps to make the course of action more clear. Unfortunately they aren't very good though. As such given your skills in this area I was wondering if you would please consider doing some replacements? In case you feel interested, below are the maps in question and all the reference details are provided in the files. Many thanks in advance. Anotherclown (talk) 10:30, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:33, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
G'day, I'm currently doing a bit of work on Battle of Wareo and think that a map would greatly improve it. The maps you created to go with some of my Bougainville campaign articles were excellent, so I was wondering if you were interested in taking on another project. I have also done some work on Battle of Sattelberg, which could be improved with a purpose drawn map. There is a map in Dexter's chapter on the Wareo-Gusika battle on p. 660, which might help if you are keen: [2]. If you are too busy, or not interested, no worries. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 04:51, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi AustralianRupert. Very busy at present otherwise I would love to. I will check back in a while to see if you have managed to get them done elsewhere, and if not I will try to get something together for you. SpoolWhippets (talk) 05:00, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, mate, sorry to badger you, but I didn't get any takers on the Wareo/Huon Peninsula map/s request at the Graphics Lab and the request has now been archived due to inactivity. If you are free/keen I'd greatly appreciate you taking a look. I also have another request in at the Graphics Lab, for a map detailing the 2/18th Battalion's ambush against the Japanese on 25 January at the Nithsdale estate in Malaya (and or its dispositions during the fighting in Singapore). The request can be found here: Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Map workshop#Malayan and Singapore campaigns 1941-42. It might take your fancy more than the Wareo map request. The 2/18th Battalion article is currently at Milhist A-class review and I'd like to take it to FA soon, and one of the points raised in the ACR so far is the need for a map. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 23:43, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Rupert. As of 1 July I am self-employed, so sitting at the home computer late into the evening is losing it's novelty value! But I do love doing the maps, so I will have a crack at Wareo to start. Would it be OK if when the maps are created I send them to you for upload? If I recreated the Dexter map in colour (which will make the Bns more distinct) and added an inset map showing location on Huon Pen - would that be good for both Battle of Wareo and Battle of Sattelberg? I have glanced at articles but haven't read them yet. SpoolWhippets (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
G'day, thanks for taking a look. If possible, I think it best if you upload them, as I believe it is key to the licencing and I wouldn't want to have them deleted on a technicality / jeopardise your work. I'm happy to help work out the correct licence if I can, though, of course. The suggestion for the format of the map sounds great and I think that would work for both. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:18, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, my understanding is that as Dexter was published in 1961, the map would still be copyrighted in the US under the URAA ruling (I believe). As such, it couldn't be copied, but could be used as a source for a new map that was suffciently different. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 14:51, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
G'day, I don't think copyright can be applied to simple shapes such as squares, circles and arrows etc. so the mil symbology should be fine, I believe. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 22:47, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:55, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
G'day, Spool. I hope you are well. I'm currently working on the Australian Army during World War II article along with a number of other editors. The article is currently at A-class review: Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Australian Army in World War II. It has a couple of maps, and while they are ok in terms of licencing, they are not of any great quality. I was wondering if you might have the time to work your magic on one of them: File:ItalianMareNostrum.jpg. If possible, could it be redone to a similar standard to the ones you made for the Bougainville campaign? It is currently being used to display the Mediterranean, North African and Middle East theatres, to show the general vicinity where the Australian Army fought its campaigns during 1941. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:55, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Rupert suggested I contact you about a couple of maps I need. These are non-wiki maps, although they will be incorporated into some articles I've done. Basically, my first use is for my dissertation on the impact of the French Revolutionary Wars in s/w Germany 1793-1803. He said you might be too busy in RL, but I thought I'd ask....auntieruth(talk)15:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
deadline is 11/15. Another clown said he would help also, but sounds like he's swamped with stuff.
this is basic map: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Autriche_ant%C3%A9rieure.png I have a version of it without the borders, but need (1) Scale (miles to inch/km to inch) added (2) Ueberlingen imperial city borders added. Second map needs to have troop movements from 1796 added. Third map needs troop movements from 1799-1800 added. Fourth map needs to show battles from those 2 campaigns added. I think they can all be built on the same map basis. Also need a larger map showing location of city in broader context (with distances from Zurich, Basel) Does this make sense? you can email me directly if you want to. auntieruth(talk)17:23, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!
Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.
G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:
tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.
As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.
The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.
G'day SpoolWhippets, I hope you are well. Not sure if you are active anymore, but if you are I was wondering if I might be able to request a slight adjustment to this map: File:The Mandated Territory of New Guinea, Papua and Bougainville 1942-45.png? I was hoping that you might be able to add a couple of locations, specifically Dumpu, Saidor, Bogadjim, Madang in New Guinea. Additionally, on New Britain would it be possible to add: Arawe, Cape Hoskins, Jacquinot Bay. If these could be added, I would look to use it in various articles including Battle of Madang and several child articles in the New Britain campaign. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 07:17, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done Rupert. Map of the Mandated Territory of New Guinea, Papua and Bougainville 1942-45 showing sites of various battles I wonder ofd for these uses I should remove the 'focus' rectangle over Kokoda. SpoolWhippets (talk) 06:25, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.
G'day, Chris, I hope you are well. I am currently taking Landings at Cape Torokina through a MILHIST A-class review. One reviewer has suggested adding a couple of locations to File:Bougainville campaign 1945.jpg, specifically Kieta on the eastern coast and Mosigetta inland from the Empress August Bay. A source map could possibly be: [3]. If you get some time online, would you mind letting me know if you can do this? Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:03, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for those changes, Chris. Just want to clarify one thing, though. I notice Koiari has been removed now and replaced with Navoi. Is this an alternative place name, or a different village? I only ask as the map is currently being used in Raid on Koiari to show the location of Koiari. Any way, once again thank you for your fantastic map work. It adds a lot to the articles I, and many others, work on. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 23:53, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, that's weird. I have no record of why I changed it to Navoi and that place name doesnt show up anywhere I look, except Uzbekistan. So it's back to Koiari. And the river names are back too. SpoolWhippets (talk) 00:22, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
G'day again, Chris, hope you are having a nice weekend. At the peer review for the Battle of Cape Gloucester article, there has been a request for some more locations to be identified on the File:New guinea.png. Here is the feedback that has been identified: [4]. If you get a chance, would you mind seeing if some of this is possible? Thanks for your time. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 04:25, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I have added all those place names and uploaded a 2x larger file. I have not included modern names (eg Manus, Muyua), I hope that will not cause problems. SpoolWhippets (talk) 01:24, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
G'day, Chris, sorry to bother you again. At the peer review, there are a couple of minor follow up points: [5]. If you get a chance, would you mind adjusting the map a little more to address these? Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:00, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:
tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.
As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.
The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.[reply]
Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!
Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon
Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!
Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk·contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!
