User talk:Spartacus Marat

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Spartacus Marat! I am WereSpielChequers and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome!

Ϣere SpielChequers 17:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Antonis Kanakis[edit]

The article Antonis Kanakis has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jac16888 ^Talk 12:21, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011[edit]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: Talk:Jobbik. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. bobrayner (talk) 12:48, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources[edit]

Hello Spartacus Marat,

please learn how to identify reliable sources. This is very important if you want to contribute to the Wikipedia in a constructive way. The websites of political parties are - of course - partisan, and not neutral, third-party, reliable sources. Please consider this in future. Thank you for your understanding. --RJFF (talk) 23:03, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral point of view[edit]

We write Wikipedia from a Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (NPOV), not from a partisan POV. Therefore it is not relevant, how the party identifies itself, but how neutral, third-party, reliable sources consider it. Please make yourself familiar with Wikipedia's policies instead of being self-opinionated when you're not in the position. If you have any questions or need help to understand the guidelines and policies, every experienced Wikipedia user will be ready to assist you. Kind regards --RJFF (talk) 23:11, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. It is really important that you read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources and learn its concept. You can use the Wikipedia:Reliable sources checklist or, if you're not sure, let sources be checked by others at the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Or you can propose changes on the respective article's talk page and let other users discuss them. The way you're editing now is neither co-operative nor helpful and will lead to your edits and additions getting reverted again and again. I don't think this is what you want. I am looking forward to better collaboration with you. --RJFF (talk) 23:24, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:RJFF[edit]

You put a comment on User:RJFF. It should be on User talk:RJFF otherwise he will not be notified and may not see it. Would you please remove your comment from User:RJFF and move it to User talk:RJFF? Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 23:21, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Signature[edit]

You can sign your comments at both article's and user's talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). Then your name and date and time will appear, and all other users can see that it was written by you and at what point of time. Kind regards --RJFF (talk) 23:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:[edit]

Of course we do it with every single party. In every single article of Wikipedia, every single piece of information has to be verified with reliable sources. --RJFF (talk) 23:28, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://xryshaygh.wordpress.com[edit]

[1] <-- This blog is dead! Check your sources, please! Dolescum (talk) 14:37, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

it died only recently

That's not the point, is it? Scientists don't publish their papers without the results and say 'well they were there last week', do they? Dolescum (talk) 14:59, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ok, remove these sources i will upload them again when the site is back on--Spartacus Marat (talk) 15:36, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gerontas Pastistsios controversy for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gerontas Pastistsios controversy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerontas Pastistsios controversy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — ΛΧΣ21™ 05:56, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Patrick Mac Manus[edit]

The article Patrick Mac Manus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Person doesn't seem notable to me

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —S Marshall T/C 10:22, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]