User talk:Soccerfootballknowledge

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Soccerfootballknowledge, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Thomas Charles Richardson, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 08:11, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thomas Charles Richardson[edit]

The article Thomas Charles Richardson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 08:11, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jamie Proctor was changed by Soccerfootballknowledge (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964966 on 2013-01-21T02:09:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:09, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gary Alexander (footballer) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eye snore 02:09, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Michel Kuipers, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Michel Kuipers was changed by Soccerfootballknowledge (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2013-01-21T02:10:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:10, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Door Wilskracht Sterk, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Door Wilskracht Sterk was changed by Soccerfootballknowledge (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960885 on 2013-01-21T02:13:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:13, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —Darkwind (talk) 02:31, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]