User talk:Sloesmemos

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Sloesmemos, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! — Bsoyka ^{✉ talk} 22:20, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sloesmemos, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Sloesmemos! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Bop34 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Translating[edit]

Hallo Sloesmemos, and thank you for contributing Michèle Foison to English Wikipedia.

It looks as if it is an almost exact translation of most of the French wiki article, although you have not acknowledged this. Please read Help:Translation#License_requirements and do the necessary to acknowledge the work of other editors. If you have translated any other articles, please do the same.

There are a few problems with the article, such as odd spacing before commas: I'll tidy it up a bit, but please take care over things like this. There is a lot to learn about editing Wikipedia but it is an interesting journey - Happy Editing! PamD 22:18, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i acknowledged it by a reference and a link. i read that how to, it does not make sense, how can a link in the edit summary be in any way an attribution of the other work? you need an active link in the text of the article. anything else is wiki solipsism. --Sloesmemos (talk) 19:45, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Doubly misidentifying an article's subject[edit]

Could I direct your attention to this revision of Sabiana Anestor? The stub at this point included not just one, but two different names seemingly misidentifying its subject (Ecaterina Guică, Kristine Jimenez). I would appreciate if you could double-check for easily spotted issues like this in the future. Thanks. AngryHarpy‍^talk 11:20, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Slowking4. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:02, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]