User talk:Sjury

Welcome

Hello, Sjury. Here are a few good links I recommend for newcomers, which even someone who's been contributing for a while might find useful:

This comes from one of the 'welcome packages' we give to most newcomers. You should have got one several months ago — sorry about that. Nevertheless, you are welcome here! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, CWC(talk) 13:23, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by SatyrTN (talk • contribs) 13:28, 21 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Nothing

In the public domain suggests Richard Court is roman catholic - he went to hale school - anglican - whats your source? Satu Suro 14:30, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Geoffrey Baron. Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Q ^{T C} 09:36, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Helen Coonan

Do you have a source for Helen Coonan being Roman Catholic?

It seems that she went to a Catholic boarding school when she was young but that's not enough. It really needs some sort of public statement in the media or something similar. People have every right to deliberately not be public about their religion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.8.12.133 (talk) 09:33, August 27, 2007 (UTC)

Edit summaries...

Please provide edit summaries to explain your edits, particularly when they are in POV and could prove controversial (ie, in Christian right. I note this is consistent behaviour for you and you have been asked before, so if it continues, i am likely will seek further opinion. --Merbabu 13:23, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

→ Please stop reverting edits on Christian right without leaving any explanation. -- Ofus 08:32, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Social conservatism aside, how else are the CDP conservative? i'd say they're rather radical and right-wing progressive. they dont campaign on economics either so they aren't economic conservative... Timeshift (talk) 15:12, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing to defy without any discussion will serve you no purpose. Timeshift (talk) 22:57, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]