User talk:Simonjohnpalmer

Speedy deletion nomination of Republic of Ireland Taekwon-Do Association

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Republic of Ireland Taekwon-Do Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. – hysteria18 (talk) 12:04, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Republic of Ireland Taekwon-Do Association.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Republic of Ireland Taekwon-Do Association.gif, which you've sourced to www.rita-itf.org. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:00, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ''bankruptcy tourism''

The article ''bankruptcy tourism'' has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a dictionary of slang or neologisms.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Revolution1221 (talk) 03:00, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

IP Editing

It looks as if you may be editing the same articles both while logged in and not. If I am incorrect in this belief I do apologise. Editing like this creates the impression, at first glance, that the edits were made by different people. Even when done by mistake or for entirely innocent reasons this is likely to give rise to allegations of sock puppetry.

If you did accidently edit articles while logged out you might consider making a dummy edit to the articles that you edited and claiming the edits in the edit summary. See WP:LOGGEDOUT.

FrankFlanagan (talk) 23:03, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes I think I did. My apologies for that, sometimes I presume I am auotmatically logged. I assumed my IP address would relate to the same account so it wouldn't be an issue. Sorry I will try and ensure it doesn't happen again.

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Simon Palmer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notable

Notable means WP:NOTABLE on Wiki, if they have no article its just a list of unreferenced unknowable people. Murry1975 (talk) 12:52, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:06, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Back2Basics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Back2Basics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Back2Basics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Murry1975 (talk) 18:12, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, Simonjohnpalmer. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Simon Palmer, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Murry1975 (talk) 12:13, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Murry1975 thank you for your comments. I will reread the guidelines and ensure I adhere to them in future.

== deletion of Back2Basics Hi Murry1975,

Is see the page relating to my radio show was deleted before I had a chance to add insight which is relevant to my case for reinstatement. Mark erroneously called the show a regional one due to the fact that FM frequencies of stations it airs a regional. However, the majority of our listeners are international and through a very successful podcast of the show which is listened to through iTunes.

We've just hit 100,000 listeners per show on iTunes, which makes us one of the biggest dance music shows in the Ireland by listenership. These listeners are worldwide, therefore, we do not see us as a 'regional radio' as outlined in the deletion log. These numbers do not include our live listeners, which we have all over the country and the world via the webfeeds for both the radio stations we feature on. PodBean has this week notified us that is has now made us a featured PodCast and will promote the show in their music category. We've also had a number of national exclusives, such a Nile Rodgers from Chic and LA duo Classixx's first ever Irish interview. I am in the process of undertaking some media coverage in relation to out 100k figures and Podbean announcement, which I hope will help boost our adherence to notability guidelines and increase the references in the article. We are an international radio show that just happens to air on FM locally in Dublin, but most of our listeners are outside Ireland with the US and UK been the most common location. This is the way radio is moving and we are future proofing ourselves. Is it possible we can work on a restoration?

Regards,

Simon (a presenter on the show)

Possibly unfree File:Emma Eliza Regan.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Emma Eliza Regan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:07, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:15, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Simonjohnpalmer. You have new messages at MusikAnimal's talk page.
Message added 21:16, 7 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

— MusikAnimal ^talk 21:16, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Simonjohnpalmer. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 15:42, 12 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 15:42, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Greystones may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

(employment agency), Perfect Gift Cards, Maritime Chatering (ships' broker), and Goldfish.ie (business telecoms firm.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:47, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COI

Your artcile isnt your article.

"You should not create or edit articles about yourself, your family or friends. If you or they are notable enough, someone else will create the article. You should also avoid writing about yourself or people you know in articles on other topics. This includes people with whom you could reasonably be said to have an antagonistic relationship in real life. If you have a personal connection to a topic or person (such as being an employee, or having family ties or some other relationship), you are advised to refrain from editing articles directly, and to provide full disclosure of the connection."

Need I say more? Murry1975 (talk) 20:49, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. TheLongTone (talk) 17:00, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Longtone, my apologies, Padraic is friend of mine and I present a radio show with him. It was just a joke and I was intending to write a correct page for him. I appreciate it is against the rules of Wikiedia. It won't happen again. Simonjohnpalmer (talk) 17:37, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

...which need references!TheLongTone (talk) 14:21, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you mean reference on Padraic's page? I added one a few minutes ago for him as he was sure how to do it. Thanks again. Simonjohnpalmer (talk) 17:57, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Padraic Marren

The article Padraic Marren has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG criteria. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources is provided nor found. A redirect to Back2Basics is possible.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 18:51, 4 February 2014 (UTC) Timestamp: 20140204185014 18:50, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Just making it clear, editing any article about you, your radio show or the companies you work for, while either logged in or out is not allowed. So dont edit any of these. However you can edit the talkpages of these articles to highlight issues on these pages. I reported you to admins and the one dealing with it told me to try and get the point across without using templates. So ta'dah :) Murry1975 (talk) 20:14, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Asif Aziz

Hi, I'm Carriearchdale. Simonjohnpalmer, thanks for creating Asif Aziz!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Perhaps you could choose some appropriate categories near the bottom of the article to help improve the overall article and make the article more easily searchable by wikipedia users. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Carriearchdale (talk) 03:53, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Simon Low

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Simon Low requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Largo Plazo (talk) 15:41, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ciaran Maguire.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Ciaran Maguire.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 23:06, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ciaran Maguire salesman.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ciaran Maguire salesman.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:07, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Goldfish.ie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Goldfish.ie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goldfish.ie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 14:29, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emma Eliza Regan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Love/Hate and IFTA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Goldfish.ie

Hello Simonjohnpalmer,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Goldfish.ie for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mindcap (talk) 09:46, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Mindcap (talk) 11:11, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Smart Storage

Hello Simonjohnpalmer,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Smart Storage for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 13:14, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:20, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

... and now, a more personal note. I have been on local radio several times, including a short stint of presenting my own show, released several albums as a musician and I'm now a company director. None of this is on Wikipedia because it doesn't actually help the business. There are a lot of existing articles that are in need of work - for example, Wicklow could do with some copyediting and fact checking. Why not concentrate on things that are unambiguously part of an encyclopedia, your work is more likely to be appreciated and it may keep the notices on your talk page down a bit. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:29, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Back2Basics logo.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Back2Basics logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Happy Pear

Hello Simonjohnpalmer,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Happy Pear for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mduvekot (talk) 16:44, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The school crest of The King's Hospital.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The school crest of The King's Hospital.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dublin South FM logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dublin South FM logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]