User talk:Shashikaprathibha

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Shashikaprathibha! I am WereSpielChequers and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Ϣere SpielChequers 20:28, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2017 September[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Sri Lanka, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.--Chanaka L (talk) 10:10, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sri Lanka, you may be blocked from editing. --Chanaka L (talk) 10:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Sri_lanka shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--Eng. M.Bandara-Talk 10:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shashikaprathibha, The pictures you had added by this edit to the Sri Lanka article is seemed to be not constructive as they were put in to a section which has no relevance to them. Also the pics you uploaded are not in good condition as they were captured from a computer monitor, book or some thing. I noticed your previous contribution and you have done good edits on articles. So I suggest you to stop adding them in to the above mentioned article repeatedly. --L Manju (talk) 11:24, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --Eng. M.Bandara-Talk 10:26, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're well over WP:3RR and are going to get blocked as soon as an admin finally wakes up, unless you back off William M. Connolley (talk) 16:15, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Sri Lanka[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:27, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sri Lanka. —DIYeditor (talk) 18:10, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sri Lanka. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 19:14, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring, as you did at Sri Lanka.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 09:08, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]