User talk:Shamimsz

Image tagging for Image:Renee-zellweger-019.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Renee-zellweger-019.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot (talk) 22:09, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Optic Flavor

A tag has been placed on Optic Flavor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. TheLetterM (talk) 04:52, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The problem stemmed from a lack of notability as well as a bit of a promotional tone. Articles of this type really need verifiable third-party references as to their importance, i.e., major media interviews, articles and the like. Small companies generally do not meet the requirements of [[WP:CORP}} and WP:NOTABILITY. Nothing personal, I assure you. Please feel free to recreate the article with the types of sources I mentioned and you should be good to go. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 05:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Everyone Nose (All the Girls Standing in the Line for the Bathroom), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DiverseMentality 21:39, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]