Please do not gratuitously remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to the Hisham Kabbani page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Strothra 13:51, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Hisham Kabbani, you will be blocked from editing. --Strothra 13:01, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. --Ed (Edgar181) 15:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for For continuing to edit war after the previous block expired. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Dreadstar† 06:33, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
No reason for unblock given; user has engaged in edit warring and POV-pushing despite a previous block. Request to unblock denied; please wait until it expires. - Mike Rosoft 11:26, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 week as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Tabercil 15:13, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nazim al-Qubrusi, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nazim al-Qubrusi was changed by Shafii Qadiri(c)(t) deleting 7548 characters on 2007-10-22T18:15:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 18:15, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Continuing to revert immediately after coming back from a block for edit warring shows a severe lack of qualities needed to edit a collaborative project such as Wikipedia. As shorter blocks have failed to prevent you from edit warring I have decided to take the unusual step of blocking you for 3 months. You can still edit this page if you would like to protest the block. If you wish to stop edit warring, state so here and i will happily unblock you. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 14:24, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. MaxSem 15:54, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
