User talk:Seagullsamman

Welcome

Hello, Seagullsamman, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Please also take a few minutes to read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.
We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Onorem♠Dil 14:30, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mazaj FM 95.3 FM

Please do not remove valid tags from articles. Also, please refrain from linking multiple times to the same website within an article. --Onorem♠Dil 14:30, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :)

Hello Onorem, Thanks for the messages, I have refrained from deleting the more than valid tags from the subjects as you probably know I'm new so the first few times it happened i assure you there was no malice intent behind it. I'm slowly getting the hang of this and I am trying to find as many third party references to secure the stub's validity (perhaps if WIKI WILLING an article one day) . I have focused on filling each page with factual information rather than opinions. Although third party opinions would be great it has only been recently that the Broadcasting environment has changed. Previously a majority of the radio stations were owned by the Government so little documentation existed. Firstly I would like to ask whether you could perhaps provide me with some more time to verify the information within all three stubs and secondly if you may, let me know, what information may not be up to Wiki's standards so I may alter it. I thank you for taking the time to read this and look forward to hearing your comments

Many thanks, San 08:53, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

I see you removed the primarysources tag from Beat FM 102.5. I have replaced it. Please do not remove it until you provide a source from someone not affiliated with the station. --Onorem♠Dil 11:12, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:BEAT LOGO.pdf)

Thanks for uploading Image:BEAT LOGO.pdf. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:15, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BEAT FM.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BEAT FM.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:39, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mood fm.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mood fm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:27, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mazaj 95.3 FM for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mazaj 95.3 FM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mazaj 95.3 FM until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gaba ^(talk) 15:38, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]