User talk:Seabuckthorn/1

Talkback

Hello, Seabuckthorn. You have new messages at Vensatry's talk page.
Message added 16:47, 27 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

—Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 16:47, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And another

Hello, Seabuckthorn. You have new messages at Quadell's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

– Quadell ^(talk) 15:13, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm Toddst1. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Talk:Mahatma_Gandhi_National_Rural_Employment_Guarantee_Act without thoroughly explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Please do not remove others' comments from talk pages as you did here. Toddst1 (talk) 06:50, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war on Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act

Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act .

While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and edit wars may be slow-moving, spanning weeks or months. Edit wars are not limited to 24 hours.

If you are unclear how to resolve a content dispute, please see dispute resolution. You are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus.

If you feel your edits might qualify as one of the small list of exceptions, please apply them with caution and ensure that anyone looking at your edits will come to the same conclusion. If you are uncertain, seek clarification before continuing. Quite a few editors have found themselves blocked for misunderstanding and/or misapplying these exceptions. Often times, requesting page protection or a sockppuppet investigation is a much better course of action.

Continued edit warring on Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act or any other article may cause you to be blocked without further notice. Toddst1 (talk) 18:17, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Turnitinpro -- Turnitinpro (talk) 03:41, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act

The article Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Turnitinpro -- Turnitinpro (talk) 06:22, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]