User talk:ScratchMarshall

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grimes (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sarah Grimes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kids Suite for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kids Suite is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kids Suite until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:27, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited TFO, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Famous Five (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Family detention

The article Family detention has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article provides only a dictionary definition of term. Unclear how this article would be helpful to readers.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 19:06, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Family detention for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Family detention is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family detention until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 20:06, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page comments

It's really difficult to follow discussions in which you take part in. Could you start to write in large paragraphs (as opposed to multiple short paragraphs) and thread your comments appropriately? Snooganssnoogans (talk) 13:04, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of situation comedies without laugh tracks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page YTV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Yanela Gómez

A tag has been placed on Yanela Gómez requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Banner talk 21:13, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yanela Chacon listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yanela Chacon. Since you had some involvement with the Yanela Chacon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Banner talk 21:17, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yanela Chacón listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yanela Chacón. Since you had some involvement with the Yanela Chacón redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Banner talk 21:18, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yanela Meister listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yanela Meister. Since you had some involvement with the Yanela Meister redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Banner talk 21:18, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yanela Piñera listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yanela Piñera. Since you had some involvement with the Yanela Piñera redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Banner talk 21:18, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yanela Brooks listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yanela Brooks. Since you had some involvement with the Yanela Brooks redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Banner talk 21:19, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Moore photograph of Honduran child, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Honduran (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clinton administration family separation policy (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This sounds like a grievance rather than an encyclopedic article

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:ScratchMarshall/Clinton administration family separation policy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:ScratchMarshall/Clinton administration family separation policy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:34, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ScratchMarshall! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:34, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation alert

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tyciol. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lolifan (talk • contribs) 19:06, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warning: Stop it

Do stop thanking via me WP:Echo for edits such as this one or for anything else. Such thank yous are seen as a form of WP:Harassment when unwanted and when clearly done by an antagonizing party. I do not like you and I consider you a disruptive editor, and you know that I do not like you and that I consider you a disruptive editor. So if you start following me, or showing up at articles I significantly edit, or continue your WP:Echo harassment, I will take you straight to WP:ANI and you will be dealt with just like all of my other harassers. Editors like NeilN, Johnuniq, Beyond My Ken and Jytdog can attest to that. Consider yourself warned. You are on thin ground editing here to begin with, and you know it. All your crap in your sock investigation won't help you. You will eventually be indefinitely blocked, whether for socking or something else. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 01:29, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the clarification which I respectfully will not thank you for. I'm not going to seek out articles for the purpose of your presence there, but given that you probably have edited many interesting articles, I can't feasibly read the entire editing history of every article I'm interested in to make sure you've not contributed to it. ScratchMarshall (talk) 02:15, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BLP edits

Just a heads up, some of your recent edits [1] [2] appear to be in violation of your BLP topic ban. –dlthewave ☎ 03:14, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. –dlthewave ☎ 03:49, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:IvanhoeTKK.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IvanhoeTKK.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheStudioKshow.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheStudioKshow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Schumer shutdown listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Schumer shutdown. Since you had some involvement with the Schumer shutdown redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. B dash (talk) 06:21, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People convicted of carrying a concealed weapon has been nominated for deletion

Category:People convicted of carrying a concealed weapon has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 14:13, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Naughty Naughty Pets

The article The Naughty Naughty Pets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2018

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 02:39, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People charged with crimes has been nominated for deletion

Category:People charged with crimes has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Di (they-them) (talk) 18:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People charged with corruption has been nominated for deletion

Category:People charged with corruption has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]