User talk:Scott tiger 2002

December 2016[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:44, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Scott tiger 2002 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Consoftions (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I was blocked for using a username that did not comply with the policies of Wikipedia. As I want to keep on using my current account, I have changed my username to "Consoftions", and it was approved - I received an email on 22d December with the approval. However, I am still blocked. Please unblock me with my new username. Thanks! Consoftions (talk) 11:05, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your new username is clearly an abbreviation of "ConquestSoftwareSolutions" and is still unacceptable for use at the English language Wikipedia - I'm sorry if this seems confusing, but we have stricter limitations here specifically at the English language Wikipedia than the general Wikimedia-wide naming conventions. Please make a new unblock request using {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, and a reviewing admin will decide if it is acceptable before it is changed. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:18, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Scott tiger 2002 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17314 was submitted on Jan 12, 2017 11:33:37. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 11:33, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

{unblock-un|scott_tiger|reason=Please change my current user name to "scott_tiger" and unblock me please so that I am able to bring my contribution to Wikipedia, create new articles, and share information worldwide, along with millions of people around the world. Thanks in advance! Consoftions (talk) 11:13, 26 January 2017 (UTC)} Sorry, but there's already a "Scott tiger" registered (you can use the "account availability check" link to check). Please change it to another name, and I'll be happy to do the rename for you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:34, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Scott tiger 2002 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

scott_tiger_2002 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

If "scott_tiger" is occupied already, maybe "scott_tiger_2002" will do?Consoftions (talk) 11:52, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Accept reason:

That's fine, renamed and unblocked, welcome back. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:31, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve ClearDB Documenter[edit]

Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Scott tiger 2002, thanks for creating ClearDB Documenter!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Reads like a feature page, not overtly promotional, but lacking sources, may not be a notable subject. Please see WP:CITE

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 04:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Oracle database documenter has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Oracle database documenter, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SJK (talk) 05:10, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ClearDB Documenter for deletion[edit]

This is a courtesy message to notify you that the article ClearDB Documenter is being considered for deletion. All editors, including you, are welcome to discuss this at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClearDB Documenter until a consensus is reached. The nomination and discussion are expected to focus on the quality of evidence and the policies and guidelines which are of concern. Please be aware that there are a number of arguments to avoid in a deletion discussion.

Users are encouraged to edit the article during the discussion, particularly in ways that address the concerns raised in that discussion. However, please do not attempt to remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article— doing so may be considered an act of bad faith and will not halt the deletion process. Thank you! SJK (talk) 09:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ClearDB Documenter logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ClearDB Documenter logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DocuVIEWER logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DocuVIEWER logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SQLDetective for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SQLDetective is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SQLDetective until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SJK (talk) 09:26, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ClearSQL logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ClearSQL logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SQLDetective logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SQLDetective logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]