User talk:Scchiang

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

內 容 大 意 描寫新英格蘭某小鎮的四位親姊妹——美克、紹、倍斯和埃梅,在溫柔的母親的教導下從少女成長的生活點滴。 在平凡的生活中,由於性格的不同,彼此之間難免因為一些瑣碎的小事而產生摩擦,吵架難免,但是除此之外, 也會發生一些令人啼笑皆非的趣事,或意想不到的妙事。在時而摩擦、時而和諧中走過她們的青春歲月。在母親的帶領下,雖然貧窮,日子過得艱辛,但是卻能幫助比她們更需要幫助的窮人。 她們那種成熟的表現,代表她們已經長大了,已脫去那青澀的外衣,轉為四個可以照顧自己的「小婦人」了

佳 句 摘 錄在底下的人不怕跌倒,低微的人不會驕傲;謙虛的人一直都會有上帝的領導。我對我擁有的滿足,不管那是多或少;上帝,我永遠知足因為你保佑。(100~101頁 嘉言懿句

P. ? 窗外已是薄暮時分,房間裡的爐火正燃燒的拍拍作響。 P.10 窗外的雪地上染上了美麗的玫瑰紅色,溫暖的陽光射進了她們的房裡。 P.24 到了傍晚時分 ,秋天的落日照紅了天空,在那金黃色的雲堆中浮現的銀峰,簡直令人以為就是「天國」的尖塔呢。 P.187 在社會的狂濤中一試自己的身手。 P.196 就像是被推落谷底,呆若木雞似的站在那裡,月光從雲際投出光芒來,窗外的風雪聽來有如魔鬼的呼吸一般可怕。 最 深 印 象 人 物 小婦人中的主角之中,我最印象深刻的人物就是「喬」,因為她最能代表我的個性,雖然有時衝動的個性還是會爆發而出,但還是可以控制的住。在小婦人一書中,我學到了與愛、和平、健康比起來,富貴簡直是毫無價值了,因為以前生日的生日,不是許變漂亮就是賺大錢,發大才之類的願望,從沒想過許世界和平、身體健康這些更具價值的願望。這都是在我讀了小婦人之後所得到的寶貴知識。 心 得 我覺得馬區太太很善良、堅強又仁慈,就好像每個媽媽,每天默默的付出,往往能冷靜的解決事情,就算事情再大、再嚴重,她們依然面不改色、從容不迫,慢慢的把事情解決,這才算是真正的偉大。 她們是一個平凡婦人所生下的平凡女子,有許多感人、溫馨、趣味甚至幽默的情節,述說這四位姐妹經歷生活的過程,和許多令人異想不到得奇事,讓人覺得活著真好。

小婦人的家庭生活真的很多采多姿,天天過著快樂悠閒的日 子,真是幸福!

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:34, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Chien Wen-pin[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Chien Wen-pin, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://nso.ntch.edu.tw/main/conductor/category_id/22, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Chien Wen-pin saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Plad2 (talk) 21:51, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kou Nai-han has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable player on a barely notable national team

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gigs (talk) 03:51, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kou Nai-han for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Kou Nai-han, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kou Nai-han until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gigs (talk) 20:10, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chen Mei-ching for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Chen Mei-ching, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chen Mei-ching until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gigs (talk) 20:11, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Szu Hui-fang for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Szu Hui-fang, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Szu Hui-fang until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gigs (talk) 20:12, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lin Ching-i for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Lin Ching-i, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lin Ching-i until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gigs (talk) 20:16, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hsu Chia-cheng has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:Sports notability criteria.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EchetusXe 01:23, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Pei Men 2006 squad.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Pei Men 2006 squad.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:47, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Yu Chih-hung has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 22:53, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chen Hui-shan for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chen Hui-shan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chen Hui-shan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 03:28, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Scchiang. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed[edit]

Hello Scchiang! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MusikBot II talk 20:47, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

JavaScript RegExp problem[edit]

I noticed you have experience in JavaScript. I'm hoping you can help me with a problem I've run into writing a userscript.

Please see my post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject JavaScript#Nested RegExp.

Thank you. The Transhumanist 12:25, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Grulla Morioka Logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Grulla Morioka Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:National volleyball squad player[edit]

Template:National volleyball squad player has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:55, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:National volleyball squad start[edit]

Template:National volleyball squad start has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:15, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:National Taiwan University of Arts logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:National Taiwan University of Arts logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2007 Highschool Football League for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2007 Highschool Football League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 Highschool Football League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 19:06, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Highschool Football League for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Highschool Football League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Highschool Football League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JTZegers (talk) 22:38, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]