User talk:Saulores

Speedy deletion of Saul Ornelas

A tag has been placed on Saul Ornelas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Firebat08 (talk) 01:05, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of speedy deletion tag

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. ... DO NOT remove the {{Db}} tag yourself! I have restored it ... please read Wikipedia:Three-revert rule and don't do it again, or you may get blocked from editing here. — 72.75.110.31 (talk) 01:26, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Saul Ornelas has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Wysprgr2005 (talk) 01:32, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Saul Ornelas. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Pinkadelica ^{Say it...} 01:40, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Report of Wikipedia:Three-revert rule violation

Hello, Saulores ... I have reported your reverts to the administrators ... you were warned! — 72.75.110.31 (talk) 01:47, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Famous (Saul Ornelas song)

A tag has been placed on Famous (Saul Ornelas song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Toddst1 (talk) 01:47, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Repeated removal of speedy deletion tags from your own article. Per a complaint at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 05:07, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Let It Go/Taking A Ride

A tag has been placed on Let It Go/Taking A Ride requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. DougsTech (talk) 02:33, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pink Balloon

The article Pink Balloon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable EP. Fails WP:NALBUM.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheJazzDalek (talk) 21:01, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A Life in the Day

The article A Life in the Day has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable self-released album by an artist who barely passes notability herself (she co-wrote a minor charting song). Fails WP:NALBUM.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheJazzDalek (talk) 16:23, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]