User talk:Sambangs

Welcome!

Hello, Sambangs, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Nsaa (talk) 10:19, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Batman: The Killing Joke has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --Unpopular Opinion (talk) 10:46, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Jak and Daxter: The Precursor Legacy[edit]

I noticed that you keep removing the Synopsis section from Jak and Daxter: The Precursor Legacy, opting instead for full sections on Setting, Characters, and Plot. It is standard practice on video game articles that, if it has these sections, they are made subsections of a "Synopsis" or "Plot" or similarly named section, since they are closely related topics. Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 07:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in Marvel: Ultimate Alliance, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. CardinalDan (talk) 06:01, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009[edit]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 300 (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.--Eaglestorm (talk) 13:41, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ryan and Sean's Not so excellent adventure[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ryan and Sean's Not so excellent adventure, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Fails WP:N specifically WP:NOTFILM

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ɪntə svɛnsk 10:18, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Ryan Higa and Sean Fujiyoshi[edit]

I have nominated Ryan Higa and Sean Fujiyoshi, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Higa and Sean Fujiyoshi. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ÷seresin 05:30, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Smosh[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Smosh. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smosh (4th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009[edit]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The Switch. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. ContinueWithCaution (talk) 13:49, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Mg GeorgeTheTimelessArtofS.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Mg GeorgeTheTimelessArtofS.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:49, 26 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:49, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]