Jump to content

User talk:Sahil verma

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Speedy deletion of Sahil Verma[edit]

A tag has been placed on Sahil Verma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. » AIAN ANDREJI BINLAYO (T/C) 02:27, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008[edit]

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. » AIAN ANDREJI BINLAYO (T/C) 02:27, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Sahil Verma constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 02:27, 2 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Sahil Verma. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 02:32, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Sahil Verma, you will be blocked from editing. » AIAN ANDREJI BINLAYO (T/C) 02:35, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]