This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)
The July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:47, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/HMS Ark Royal (91)
For all your work that brought HMS Ark Royal (91) to Featured status. Benea (talk) 14:12, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
To be honest, I've never given a barnstar before, not because I've never felt anybody deserved it, but rather that it didn't seem as if I had the authority to declare various bits of work worthy, if you know what I mean. I have no such doubts though that your work on Ark Royal is both worthy, and that you deserve some sort of acknowledgement. This seemed appropriate, though the description seems to imply that it's just for 'spelling, grammar and punctuation', and I think your work went far beyond that! Best wishes, Benea (talk) 14:12, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
I suspect you'll regret that! To be honest, my other project at the moment is the Horatio Nelson, 1st Viscount Nelson article. There were murmurs about returning it to a featured article in time for a main page appearance on the 250th anniversary of his birth (23rd September this year). I've no particular problems about working on the content (though there's a lot that's missing, that I've recently been trying to fill in), but it's in dire need of copyediting and restructuring. No worries though if this is something that you don't want to take on, after progressing one article from B to FA class, the last thing I feel like doing is jumping in with another! ttfn, Benea (talk) 17:54, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
AWM copyright
Hi Saberwyn, This discussion on my talk page may be of interest to you - Abraham, B.S. has noticed that the AWM has a statement on their website which says that all their pre-1959 photos are not covered by copyright. By the way, congratulations to Benea and yourself for the Ark Royal article sailing through its FA nomination. I'd like to claim that my critical comments helped the article develop, but I suspect that I just bugged you both ;-) Nick Dowling (talk) 12:04, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Ordo Xenos, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Ordo Xenos is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Ordo Xenos, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click hereCSDWarnBot (talk) 19:21, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Ibram Gaunt
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ibram Gaunt, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --EEMIV (talk) 15:06, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:UltrasaurusZBC.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:UltrasaurusZBC.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:28, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:Viper mark 7s.jpg
Image Copyright problem
Thanks for uploading Image:Viper mark 7s.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:42, 29 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:42, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:Gildragonscale.jpg
Image Copyright problem
Thanks for uploading Image:Gildragonscale.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:56, 29 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:56, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Gildragongenesis.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Gildragongenesis.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:56, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:Kingdavidsnovel.jpg
Image Copyright problem
Thanks for uploading Image:Kingdavidsnovel.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:57, 29 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:57, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Zoidslogo.jpg
Image Copyright problem
Thank you for uploading Image:Zoidslogo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
This message is a test to check to see if members of the Warhammer 40K Project are still online, active and interested in helping the project. If you are no longer interested in the project all you need to do is...nothing! If you don't respond to this I'll take your name off the list and you'll never here from us again. If you're the proactive type you can remove the name yourself or talk to me and I'll do it.
If you are still interested in helping out the 40K project or otherwise still want to be listed there you can say so in response to this message on your talk page or on mine. Alternately you can add our new userbox ({{User WikiProject Warhammer 40,000}}) to your userpage and I'll take that as a response. The userpage doesn't automatically include people in a category of members yet, but it might in the future.
We've assessed most of the articles in the project on the Version 1.0 assessment scale (the table on the project page should take a few days to update) but we need to push to get the core articles in the project up to GA status. Thanks for all your help. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help the project along. Protonk (talk) 21:13, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Anime Screeenshots..
It would be nice if you could include the name of the specfic copyright holders,
so they can be wikilinked. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:58, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:33, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)
The August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:17, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The September 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please vote here by September 30! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:24, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:CWolf AC and Irvine.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:CWolf AC and Irvine.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanztalk 14:01, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:BladeLiger AB.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BladeLiger AB.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanztalk 14:01, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Shadowfox.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Shadowfox.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanztalk 14:01, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Shield Liger.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Shield Liger.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanztalk 14:01, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Gunbluster.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Gunbluster.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanztalk 14:02, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
I reverted ([1]) some of the changes you made ([2]) to this page. I would be glad to discuss if you disagree with my changes. Happy editing. 24.20.131.232 (talk) 01:48, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Ibram Gaunt
I have nominated Ibram Gaunt, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibram Gaunt. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. --EEMIV (talk) 21:00, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Image:Zeroimperialx.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Zeroimperialx.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MBisanztalk 17:55, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:Zeropanzer2.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Zeropanzer2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MBisanztalk 17:55, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:Redhornmodel.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Redhornmodel.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MBisanztalk 17:55, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:Saberlion.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Saberlion.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MBisanztalk 17:55, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:ZeroBCAS.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:ZeroBCAS.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MBisanztalk 17:56, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:Tanithstandard.jpg
Image Copyright problem
Thanks for uploading Image:Tanithstandard.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:56, 1 October 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanztalk 17:56, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)
The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:HMAS melbourne 2 crest.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:HMAS melbourne 2 crest.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:50, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Firefly edit
Thanks for the correction! I did remove it in good faith but you're right, it isn't vandalism. I'll be more careful in the future. Thanks for the heads up!Cpt ricard (talk) 16:13, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Jet Falcon
I have nominated Jet Falcon, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jet Falcon. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 17:57, 21 October 2008 (UTC) TTN (talk) 17:57, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Dawgs
Your post on the AfD well was stated, but I'm still a little baffled on the nomination on that article. I hadn't in fact realized that the term "Wiredawg" was one of the big issues. I thought it was clear from the article (and the related websites) that this was a term to describe Air Force personnel in two job categories. It's a bit unusual for a title, but consider the alternative: have you checked out what the job titles are actually called? And as far as media coverage, as the military is very insular, I'm not surprised really that there's not more outside coverage. I actually think the wiredawg.net website in and of itself makes it pretty clear that this is a legitimate and established descriptive term. And regarding the other issues: I agree!, but those seem to require editorial fixes, not deletion. Sorry to post this here. I think I've posted enough in that AfD so I leave it to others to weigh in, or for the decision to be made based on the votes and reasonings already there. But I just wanted to give you my response on the issues you raised. :) Take care. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:48, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Notabtility / significant coverage
Hi Saberwyn
Further to your note to ChildofMidnight, here are some of my thoughts on what "significant coverage" means with respect to the WP:N:
There are lots of different interpretations of what "significant coverage" means. My view is that it requires that the coverage be in sources that are not intended to be exhaustive lists of things (i.e., directories of any sort).
In fact, the janitorial and plumbing professions are covered widely and frequently in numerous sources other than directories. And possibly so are cable splicers, etc. But there is no evidence that military cable splicers in particular are significantly covered on their own in reliable sources other than directories.
Logically, if everything that is reliably covered in detail merits its own article, then Wikipedia becomes the union of every directory ever published, which clearly is not the thrust of WP:NOTDIR.
Thoughts? I'd like to see these ideas added to the policy, presonally. Bongomatic 13:14, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)
The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:55, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
OK, that makes sense, and I'll leave well alone for now so that the categorisation is consistent. I agree that the RAN category tree is a mess - it seems to have been shoe-horned into the same category structure as that used for the USN, and this isn't sensible. I'd suggest a category structure with Category:Ships of the Royal Australian Navy as the top-level cat and then sub-categories for each of the main types of ships the RAN has operated. Separating the ships into different time-periods and active/inactive categories doesn't work in my view. Nick-D (talk) 09:50, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Would it be feasible to limit the category tree to the sub-cats which are visible on the Category:Ships of the Royal Australian Navy page? (give or take a few - would organising the ships by class be sensible? - it would work for frigates, but be a waste of time for amphibious assault ships) - I think that this would work given that the RAN hasn't operated all that many ships of any type (even the 50 Bathurst class vessels are the only corvettes its ever operated). It might also be possible to use bots for re-classifications to limit the amount of grunt work needed, but don't quote me on that! Nick-D (talk) 10:03, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
That structure looks perfect to me. If you're happy with it, we probably need to propose it on the Wikiproject ships talk page before it goes ahead as the current structure was, if I remember correctly, the outcome of a project-wide categorisation effort. Nick-D (talk) 07:10, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
OK, here's some examples of ships which don't fall into an obvious category. I prefer 'X of the Royal Australian Navy' as this is consistent with other categorisation.
I've also just speedy-deleted those two categories you nominated for deletion as the categories are now empty. Nick-D (talk) 07:52, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Those look spot on to me. I think that the multiple categories are fine for every case where you've suggested that adding the ship to several new categories would be over-categorisation. I think that HMAS Wyatt Earp would best belong in Category:Auxiliary ships of the Royal Australian Navy by the way. Nick-D (talk) 09:40, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Gunbluster
I have nominated Gunbluster, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gunbluster. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 20:37, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Bear Fighter
I have nominated Bear Fighter, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bear Fighter. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 20:39, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Saberlion
I have nominated Saberlion, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saberlion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 20:40, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Leoblaze
I have nominated Leoblaze, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leoblaze. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 20:42, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)
The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:25, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Stealth Viper
I have nominated Stealth Viper, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stealth Viper. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 22:45, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Please accept this award in recognition of your remarkable work on Australian naval history articles. Nick-D (talk) 09:47, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Matrix Dragon
I have nominated Matrix Dragon, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matrix Dragon. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 22:08, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Barigator
I have nominated Barigator, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barigator. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 22:10, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Death Stinger
I have nominated Death Stinger, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death Stinger. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 22:18, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Units of measure
Hi -- If you are going to have a go at integrating info from http://www.bta.mil/fedebiz/PRIVATE/EDIT/document/lfwg/flissue.pdf into wikipedia I do wonder what we need of (a) articles about each codes eg CZ redirects to volume where it is defined as 1m^3; (b) Do we have a list of units anywhere? I've found list of humorous units and lists of systems of measurement but I haven't yet found lists of units eg units of length containing metre, foot, yard, mile, rod, pole, perch, etc etc; (c) Do we need articles on the DoD coding schemes themselves - eg We appear to have an article ANSI ASC X12 but it has less in it than I would hope and I haven't tracked down one on DoD unit of issue and purchase unit codes. I haven't done anything about it yet as it seemed too hard! -- SGBailey (talk) 23:07, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
I just shot myself in the foot with that units of length example, it exists! However Is there a units of volume? (cubic metre, pint, gallon, litre, fluid ounce, US gallon, etc. -- SGBailey (talk) 23:09, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
HMAS Castlemaine
During the time when Melbourne paid off, I was serving in Navy Office. We received a minute one day asking if we needed anything off Melbourne for security purposes. As I was involved in the restoration work on Castlemaine at the time through my membership of the Australian Branch of the Royal Naval Amatuer Radio Society, I contacted the guys at the Maritime Trust and asked them if they thought anything from the old girl would be of use. I ended up with a wish list which I contacted the people in charge of the ship and managed to secure a large number of items such as proper naval electrical switches, stanchions, 240 VDC vent fans, 240 VDC to 240 VAC motor generators and all sort of stuff, about 3 tons of it in all. As it happenned, the guys in Navy I first approached got the gear off and loaded up on three pallets at Zetland within a week or so of me first contacting them, but the paper trail in Canberra is tortuous and it took IIRC 6-9 months before we finally got the green light officially, by which time the ship had transferred from Navy control to the Department of Admin Services. The Minister for Admin Services took one look at the inventory of what we had on the pallets and the book replacement value of the gear ($28,000) and decided that the Government had done enough by giving the Trust the ship and that we could pay for the items. Lousy sod. I got a very embarrassed phone call from someone over in Admin Services and, as he knew well we could not afford that sort of money, we talked around the point for a bit and then he said that he could not give us the gear, but he could sell it to us for whatever price we agreed on, he asked me if $300 was OK. I wrote out the cheque that day.
Now I know that none of this can go in the article as yet - original research and all that - but perhaps knowing this might help if you come across something and it might help join some dots. Nick Thornetalk 12:39, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Shadow Fox
I have nominated Shadow Fox, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadow Fox. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 20:36, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Rev Raptor
I have nominated Rev Raptor, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rev Raptor. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 20:38, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Hayate Liger
I have nominated Hayate Liger, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayate Liger. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 23:41, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Gustav (Zoids)
I have nominated Gustav (Zoids), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gustav (Zoids). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 23:45, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Death Saurer
I have nominated Death Saurer, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death Saurer. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 23:49, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Command Wolf
I have nominated Command Wolf, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Command Wolf. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 23:51, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Thunderzerocomparecrop.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Thunderzerocomparecrop.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanztalk 13:59, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:LZPhoenix.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:LZPhoenix.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanztalk 14:00, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:ShieldligerCP01crop.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:ShieldligerCP01crop.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanztalk 14:00, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Your hard work is about to be deleted from Wikipedia
The article you created, Command Wolf is about to be deleted from Wikipedia.
There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Command Wolf. The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important.
There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:
2. You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted, here: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond on the deletion page.
3. When try to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you. Here is a list of your own acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept. Acronyms in deletion debates are sometimes incorrectly used, or ignore rules or exceptions.
Barigator is also up for deletion, by the same editor. travb (talk) 00:50, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Categorisation problem
Hello, Which category of the RAN category tree do you think that the new article HMVS Countess of Hopetoun/HMAS Countess of Hopetoun should be placed in? I'm pretty sure that it belongs in the patrol vessels category, but thought that I'd check with you. By the way, I currently have the Australian Naval Aviation Museum's book Flying Stations. A Story of Australian Navy Aviation on loan from the library if you need any cites for the HMAS Sydney article. cheers, Nick-D (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)
The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:42, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Well done!
The WikiProject Barnstar
For your extensive contributions to the Military history WikiProject, as evidenced by your nomination in the 2008 "Military Historian of the Year" awards, I am delighted to present you with this WikiProject Barnstar --ROGER DAVIEStalk 03:58, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Canterbury
Hi Saberwyn - you recently removed the blank fields on the infobox of HMNZS Canterbury (F421), a move that I reverted. The reason is that without the blank fields, it becomes much more onerous to add the missing information if someone later comes across the data. Unless he/she is very experienced in the use of that template, he may not even KNOW that there is a field for that piece of data. Therefore, please keep such "blank spaces" as they are - they have a use. Thanks and happy editing. Ingolfson (talk) 05:04, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
North Wood Camp
Hello Saberwyn - I apperiate you informing me of your porposed deletion of North Wood Camp.
Only publish information on North Wood Camp of Greater YMCA is located on their website. I physically went to the camp itself couple decades ago and its still there. I am uncertain how else to show its worthy enough to be least listed on Wikipedia since its sister camps are listed here as well. I've refer to the YMCA's Boston's website. I am admittively new at wikipedia and do this part-time. I still learning properly do this. So I am uncertain how else to bring standards of the listing up from what resources I can find of it. There no listing of YMCA of Greater Boston on Wikipedia only on their own website. [1]Colt9033 (Colt9033) 08:10, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Flying Stations
Hi Saberwyn, I noticed you mentioned this book on Nick-D's talk page. I have a copy of the book, what do you need from it? Nick Thornetalk 14:40, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Camp North Woods
Hello Saberwyn
Thanks for holding off for and helping try find independant source of information on the camp.
I believe only source of information that does exist to make it stand out is in written form which i do not own anymore. I was in camp in 1981-82. If i found written pathlet. Would that be allowable to post imagine of which prove is uniqueness? For mean time, is there place simply list the camp itself so it has some noted it exists? Thank you for your time.
Colt9033 (Colt9033) 10:35, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Indonesia
Thanks. If you've been to Indonesia, you will know that only "officially" they drive on the left. ;-) --Merbabu (talk) 01:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
By the way, the reason why this revert has had to be made so many times is that Indonesians misunderstand the phrase "drive on the..." to be the side the driver sits on. It will happen again. Davidelit (talk) 03:46, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Maybe a hidden note in the text? -- saberwyn 03:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)
The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:14, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Soloists
I'm glad someone noticed it :) - Ddawkins73 (talk) 15:54, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)
The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:39, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:12, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
RAN ceremonial entrance to Sydney tomorrow
Hi Saberwyn, have you seen this? Nick-D (talk) 10:21, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
The Photographer's Barnstar
Thank you for getting up early on a Friday morning and greatly improving Wikimedia's holdings of photos of Australian warships. Nick-D (talk) 22:55, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Great work! Nick-D (talk) 08:05, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
RE: Attackerclass
Okay cited, there are also photos and discussions on militaryphotos.net for these boats.
--Zaher1988 · Talk|Contributions 07:07, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:07, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)
The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:38, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the improvements to the article about the "ARA Patagonia (B-1)". However, I'm unsure why you've removed the "empty" sections, as I put them with the intention of filling them in after gathering more info about the ship. Kind regards, DPdH (talk) 16:11, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply! which makes sense to me... My intention was to fill-in them within a brief time (which I did not do, due to lack of time). So for the time being will not add the removed sections unless I can put some info. Cheers, DPdH (talk) 23:54, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
By order of the coordinators, for your good work helping with the WikiProject's Peer and A-Class reviews, I hereby award you this Military history WikiProject Reviewers' award. Roger Daviestalk 14:10, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
DYK for HMAS Onslow
On April 22, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article HMAS Onslow, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)
The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:10, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
British LCT article
FYI, I've just blocked the edit warrior for 48 hours - they'd been warned lots of times for their behavior and were way past three reverts. Nick-D (talk) 09:02, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Saberwyn. You have new messages at Nick-D's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thanks for your contributions. I didn't have any time to look for sources, and I'm glad this article won't sit as a stub. -RunningOnBrains 06:54, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Banana boat (boat), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.boatsdepot.org/boats/types/banana.asp. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:55, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Banana boat (boat) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AeonicOmegatalk 00:55, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
I've avoided giving you {{Nothanks-web}}, the templated response to these situations, because I respect you and your other contributions too much to template a regular. That said, reviewing the template text may help you decide what to do next. -- saberwyn 09:28, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Howdy! Thanks for your message, and thanks for not treating me like an infant or an imbecile - I can assure it is appreciated.
I have a number of comments, some of them philosophical, some of them informative, and some of them simply my opinion.
Informative:
I'm not the only contributor to this article - you may want to inform User talk:Abraham, B.S. and User talk:Nick-D too. To be honest, I would expect both of them can (and would/will) do a better job of resolving this than me.
You may also want to put something on one of the relevant Milhist pages - even more people who are even more competant raed those.
Opinion:
That template is really ugly, and completely unhelpful. It makes it impossible to determine what you are complaining about. Surely there's a better way to do it than that?
Philosophical:
I do not believe one can copyright facts.
Never-the-less, one doesn't have to be a genius to see that sections of the Coates article are indeed a "perfect subset" of the ADF bio, and yes, that should NOT be the case. (I'm surprised I was so lazy.)
I'm sure you agree that there's no denying that the guy is notable, and that it would be stupid to delete the article due to copyvio when it wouldn't be hard to extract the facts and present them with different wording which is not copyvio.
So, please suggest a good way forward.
My (no doubt biassed) opinion is that getting rid of that ugly template would be a good start. Then enlisting one or more of the many competent wiki-military-historians would be a good next step.
Thanks for your rational and considered approach to the problem. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 12:10, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
I understand where you are coming from, but the main problem is that you have taken the information on the ADF website, copied them word-for-word (including formatting and spelling errors), and effectively claimed the work of another as your own. The facts themselves cannot be copyrighted, but the wording and presentation can, and although unlikely to happen, as the editor who contributed the copyrighted information, the Australian Government could take you to court for copyright infringement.
The template used is the one indicated by the Wikipedia:Copyright violations policy for situations when all versions of an article contain the copyrighted information. I think (but do not no for sure) that it is intended to mask the copyrighted information and make known that action is being taken to correct the situation. Per insturctions, I also listed the article at Wikipedia:Copyright problems, where admins who know more about dealing with copyright issues than you or I can look at the situation and advise the best course of action. Until then, I think the template should remain and I don't think there's much either of us can do. -- saberwyn 22:41, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
"I don't think there's much either of us can do." - I disagree. It's not like you've opened Pandora's Box and can't close it.
I have rewritten the article; there should now be no copyright problems.
I suggest you now remove the offending text and remove the template; I don't see any point in involving lots of other people now that the issue has been addressed and the problem now solved. I would have done it myself, but I expect that there would be people who would get upset, so I haven't.
If you have served on any of these vessels or have any real positive contribution to make - fine! Been there done that. Out of here anyway - the whole Wikipedia project has become totally corrupt! Regards Medcroft. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Medcroft (talk • contribs) 22:05, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)
The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:52, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I've added the battle honours back to the infobox. I made the same error before, but it seems that they are inherited and should be shown. Mjroots (talk) 04:29, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
I was always under the impression that only the battle honours earned by a particular ship should be shown, as although inherited honours belong to the same name, they belong to different ships. That said, I haven't been able to find any guidelines or significant commentary either way, so I'm going to raise the question at WP:SHIPS and the maritime warfare task force and see what is said. -- saberwyn 04:45, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello
I just wanted to drop in and say hello.
I know wikipedia isn't supposed to be used for this, but oh well :P
I'm also Australian, and am writing a novel. I thought we could share ideas and tips?
Also, what part of Aus are you from?
Hope to hear from you.
--Flashflash; 19:58, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:HMAS melbourne 2 crest.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
