User talk:Ryoga3099

UKeSA

The UKeSA no longer claim to be the official governing body, and they actively removed it from their press releases, so stop being a tool.

Show me something where the UKeSA says it is the official governing body, or accept that even they don't claim it to be the case.

So? YOU've put in a false statement, and are now claiming others need a citation to show you're wrong?

How can I offer a source to show that an organisation don't claim something? UKeSA doesn't claim to be a snooker league either, but I can't link to you anything where they say they AREN'T a snooker league...

Given I really can't be assed, how about you just edit out your claim that it's an official league, or email [email protected] and ask them yourselves

United Kingdom eSports Association

Hi. I note from your comments on File talk:UKESALARGECMYK.jpg that you claim to own copyright on this file, which would make you an agent of the United Kingdom eSports Association. If that is the case then you should not really be editing their article per our conflict of interest guidelines. If it is not the case then you may have violated the organization's copyright by copying their logo. Please provide some clarification. best. Mfield (talk) 17:24, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So regarding your comment, as one of a set of designers you may have helped create the logo but you do not hold copyright on it. It is incorrectly tagged and in the absence of official and logged email confirmation to Wikipedia from the Association of release under a compatible license it is a copyright violation. Mfield (talk) 20:42, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Hello, Ryoga3099. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is WP:OUTING violation?. Thank you. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 03:29, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Links

If you're going to add them to the article, do so as regular website references next to their accompanying name in the prose, and try to reference the exact page saying they're a member. That'll make it easier for readers and give you more references for the bulk of the article.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 16:35, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. Just try to keep the reference after a punctuation mark of some sort (like a comma or period) or closing parenthesis. It'll save you some headache down the pike if you go for GAN.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 16:54, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Hi, I noticed that your signature is

<small> [[User:Ryoga3099|Ryoga3099]] ([[User talk:Ryoga3099|talk]])

Unfortunately, I think you're missing a </small> at the end, which is messing up the formatting of subsequent text. Could you change your signature to

<small>[[User:Ryoga3099|Ryoga3099]] ([[User talk:Ryoga3099|talk]])</small>

Thanks! -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:03, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Streamworks International, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Providence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Streamworks International, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Hope Baptist Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:13, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Streamwork International Logo 150 x 100.png

Thanks for uploading File:Streamwork International Logo 150 x 100.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:56, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]