Jump to content

User talk:Ryan Vesey/Archive 15

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10←Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15Archive 16Archive 17→Archive 20

Night in paintings disambig - thanks

Thanks for the disambig of Night in paintings. Great idea!--CaroleHenson (talk) 18:07, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Ryan is my wiki-uncle, we are in good hands :D -- RexRowan  Talk  18:11, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
No problem. You two have been doing good work. I'm watching the articles more from an educational standpoint than a Wikipedia one. It's a very interesting topic. Rex, I'm glad you started it and Carole, thanks for helping it along. Have you two considered nominating one or both of them for Did you know? You could also do a two in one DYK nom that includes both. Ryan Vesey 18:19, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Good point, when the articles are moved along a bit more, that makes a lot of sense! Great idea!--CaroleHenson (talk) 18:25, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
We've got 3 days before the nomination needs to take place, there will be room for more improvements after that. Ryan Vesey 18:27, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Thank you very much Ryan! :D -- RexRowan  Talk  18:50, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Thank you very much for helping out and keeping an eye on me! Teamwork! :D  RexRowan  Talk  20:20, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Rex!

I feel you deserve recognition for helping me.

So I award you:

Wikipedia Motivation Award
For helping me find more mundane tasks that still improve the project. Amadscientist (talk) 21:23, 25 August 2012 (UTC)


And for your own work on the Former TAFI template:

All Around Amazing Barnstar
For figuring out the proper syntax coding and cleaning up the template and doc at Template:Former TAFI. Amadscientist (talk) 21:23, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

--Amadscientist (talk) 21:23, 25 August 2012 (UTC) Thanks Amadscientist! What's the short form of your name by the way? Mad? Scientist? Master? Dr. Horrible? Ryan Vesey 22:15, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

A few olympians, as requested

Vladimir Alekno, Ekaterina Poistogova, Uktamjon Rahmonov, Fazliddin Gaibnazarov, Edgar Cortez, Evan MacDonald, Colin Daynes, Aleksandar Aleksandrov (boxer), Gabriel Maestre, Chouaib Bouloudinat, Oleksandr Hvozdyk

Enjoy! --j⚛e deckertalk 13:57, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much, I'll get on these as fast as possible. Ryan Vesey 23:05, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

js scripts

Hi Ryan. I'm just letting you know that importScript('User:Ryan Vesey/sidebar.js'); doesn't work. It killed most of the other links in the side bar and and many of the admin helper scripts in the top toolbar. (vector.js) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:07, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Hmm, everything works fine for me. I wonder if it's caused because you are using vector.js or because your an admin. I'll leave a note for Gadget850. In the meantime, would you be able to upload a screenshot? I'll also leave a note on the page where I posted the script. Ryan Vesey 17:30, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Wait, vector is the default. I'd assume it is because of the admin helper scripts. I'll still leave a note. Ryan Vesey 17:32, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
I'm still going to leave a note, but I think I know your problem. You included a comment stating the purpose of the script; however, I believe the comment should have been preceeded by two slashes like // puts a link in the sidebar to <!-- NewPagesFeed --> It might solve your poblem if you put that in there. Ryan Vesey 17:40, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Yes, I forgot to put the two //. Thanks, and sorry to have put you to trouble. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:04, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Explains why I did not see a problem there. However:
---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 20:11, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Ryan Vesey. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 04:27, 27 August 2012 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Hopefully :) Calmer Waters 04:27, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Dabs

Thanks for providing 217573 dab pages! Took over an hour just to add the raw list. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 18:43, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. What are you planning on doing with them? Ryan Vesey 18:58, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 08:15, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Custom module and MI fixes

Rjw is developing a new piece of code that will support the new Multiple Issue format and GoingBatty is performing some beta testing. AWB allows pieces of code to be added additionally to the original general fixes with the use of a "custom module". The custom module is activated in Tools -> Make module (or by pressing Ctrl+M). The user can add their own code and make customised fixes. More details can be found in Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/Custom Modules. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:38, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

File:ZIBA logo.gif

I've undeleted it, but it still needs a fair-use rationale (or you might want to consider arguing PD-ineligible, because inside of the red circle is the numeral 1, I think?). Maxim(talk) 00:07, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, FUR added. I won't worry about the PD argument. It's a bit shaky because there seem to be clear creative elements. It comes close to the threshold and there's no reason the image needs to be PD. Ryan Vesey 01:09, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Hey man!

Jeez, it's been a while. I've had a TON of stuff hit me, a lot of family crises. I'm back now, :D Ax1om77 03:33, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Hey, glad to see you're back! Just to let you know, I'll be goin off line in a day and probably won't be back for another 4. I'm driving out to college. Ryan Vesey 03:52, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

IRC

I'm on IRC as benzband. benzband (talk) 13:21, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

JSTOR

Could you look see if you can find anything on Lake Tissongo please?♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:37, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

A generic JSTOR search gave me 20 results for Lake Tissongo and 24 for Tissongo. I'm leaving for Penn in the morning so I'm frantically packing, but I grabbed the source that I believe has the most mentions. You can hopefully find it at this link. Tell me when you have downloaded it or if it doesn't work. (If it doesn't work, send me an email as well and I'll attach it as a file). The source mentions Pigmy camps but I still only see 7 mentions of Tissongo. I'll try to look more in depth later and check out some other sources. Do you know if there is another name? I'm perusing the african studies journals that I have access to and not finding everything. Ryan Vesey 19:57, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Says an error. Don't worry about it..♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:04, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

I have JSTOR access and I just sent Dr. Blofeld a listing of the 24 references. Bgwhite (talk) 20:33, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Your mentoring of Red Hat On Head

I looked over your mentoring, and I wanted to say that I think you're doing a stupendous job. I really like watching people take a genuine interest in helping new users grow. I really like your tests (and I think veteran Wikipedians ought to take them too), not just because they require knowledge of the policies, but because they force you to show how you think about Wikipedia, editing, and the policies / guidelines more conceptually.

Is there a barnstar for this? Maybe I'll have a look around... I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 21:29, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, I took this all from User:Worm That Turned so he should get most of the credit. I actually thought I was a veteran editor when I took them from him and I learned a heck of a lot. In fact, I still look over my answers and his responses to my answers to clear me up on things. Ryan Vesey 21:31, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Is this test something you can link to? User:King4057 08:04, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Check User:Ryan Vesey/Adopt. Ryan Vesey 11:35, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Beef Products Inc.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Beef Products Inc.. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 08:15, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

More Olympians

User:Joe Decker/Olympics here's a list of over a thousand. I'd hoped to automate the process of fixing most of them, however, the london 2012 web site appears to actively resist automated reading of athlete's pages. Anything that's done here may have to be done by hand.

I very much hope to find a non-dramatic solution, but I'm kind of at a loss as to how to generate interest in getting these correctly referenced. --j⚛e deckertalk 21:12, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

PS: Updating that list soon, it will get a bit shorter. --j⚛e deckertalk 22:41, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Update: Think I actually did find a workaround for scraping. Nevermind, at least for now.  :) --j⚛e deckertalk 00:59, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
I've got a list at User:Ryan Vesey/Olympian stubs. Ryan Vesey 02:38, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Rockin'. BTW, I've filed the BRFA toward fixing those with no other sources, that's perhaps a more limited goal than one might eventually want, but it's also a pretty conservative place to start, and BRFA is a fairly conservative process. --j⚛e deckertalk 02:46, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
I'm going slower because my goal is to add results. It will probably take me the whole school year, but I'll be adding sources with the results. I created {{CLO}} to make the process easier. Ryan Vesey 02:53, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Oh nice! On all accounts. I also managed a bit of sleight of hand I was happy with, by adding "BLP unreferenced" to a handful of these, I was able to catch the attention of at least two of my old pals from WP:URBLPR, and I've seen a few extra articles get some love in that way. --j⚛e deckertalk 03:01, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

RE: TAFI on CP

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Maryana (WMF)'s talk page. Maryana (WMF) (talk) 21:42, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Reviewing

Hi Ryan, I heard somewhere that some edits will have to be reviewed from December? Do you know which ones and how that will be done?  Adam Mugliston  Talk  07:18, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

It will be sort of like a step down from semi-protection. I'm not sure if they have pages planned, but when it happens there will be a list of changes that need reviewing. If you are more interested read Wikipedia:Pending changes and Help:Pending changes. If you would like to be a reviewer, reading Wikipedia:Reviewing (in addition to those) is a must. One note is that edits should be accepted unless they are vandalism. If you disagree with the edit, accept and then revert. Edits should not be accepted if they are vandalism, BLP violations, copyright violations, or contain legal threats. In addition, if the edits are for the same reason that the page was protected they shouldn't be accepted. Ryan Vesey 12:20, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
I've already applied for Reviewer in advance for the pending changes. Thanks for the info. By the way, minor changes also show up on my watchlist ;-)  Adam Mugliston  Talk  14:12, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

{{wikify}}

AWB is still slapping it on. benzband (talk) 17:11, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Re: Talkback

Left a comment on the image page, but in short, I just added a mention of terraces to the image page on Commons. SpencerT♦C 22:53, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

User Pages

Could you please send me the "This user is a Christian." code? Thanks! Dplcrnj (talk) 02:24, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Here is the code:{{User:UBX/Christian}} AutomaticStrikeout 02:28, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Wikify close

I've seen several comments by you which seem to me to suggest that the close result was to 1:1 replace wikify with dead end. That wasn't the close. If I am misunderstanding your comments, please clarify. - jc37 06:33, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Nope, I apologize if my comments seem to confuse things. Your close was only to delete the template. The rest of your close should be taken as a suggestion because it wasn't based on the discussion. I think it is a valid idea (commons does it with a lot of PD templates) but it will need a separate discussion. I have even pointed out that we cannot be mass deleting {{Wikify}} or replacing it with Dead End. (A bot request was made to that end). AWB should switch from tagging articles with Wikify to tagging them with dead end because the algorithm it used to add the Wikify tag has always been more suited for the dead end tag. Ryan Vesey 13:16, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
My apologies for any confusion, but no, the "suggestion" to use template as a dab page was indeed part of the close. I attempted to make that clear by bolding the text. And it very much did stem from the discussion.
Anyway, regardless, you deserve kudos for following up on all of this, as you note, the automated tools could make this a complex thing to resolve. - jc37 17:06, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Like I said, I don't think your idea is a bad one; however, the concept of turning the template into a dab page was never mentioned in the discussion. The suggestion was not within admin discretion since a number of the !votes were specifically to deprecate and redirect to dead end. Once the transclusions of {{Wikify}} are cleared we will need to have another discussion. Ryan Vesey 19:46, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Are you able to point to the comments you are referring to so I can clarify them? Ryan Vesey 13:29, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
You just did, above. - jc37 17:06, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

Steven Zhang's Fellowship Slideshow

In this issue:

  • Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
  • Research: The most recent DR data
  • Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
  • Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
  • DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
  • Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
  • Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 19:27, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

Thanks for looking out for me!  Adam Mugliston  Talk  20:59, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

????

Whats wrong with this page? Aster linosyris How come it tells me I don't have references thing, if I actualy do?--Mishae (talk) 22:21, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

The last reference on the page wasn't closed. I closed it for you. Ryan Vesey 22:23, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks.--Mishae (talk) 22:27, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

All inclusive categories

Are you aware that these all inclusive categories have been the subject of serious discussion, and that many oppose their existence? And for good reason, if I may say. For this reason, people have not created any more of them, for the last year. Are you aware of this? Debresser (talk) 17:16, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) What do you mean by 'all inclusive categories'? benzband (talk) 18:03, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Categories like "All articles needing...", "All articles with...". Debresser (talk) 18:25, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Like in these edits. [1] [2] Debresser (talk) 20:22, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
They enables backlog counting and tracking, using {{PAGESINCATEGORY:}} and {{backlog progress bar}}. For a project which uses a drive system (such as WP:WWF), this is very useful if not essential. :) benzband (talk) 18:40, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Benzband, I've started working on Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikify/Track so that anyone can see their progress. I'll post a link on the talk page when I get a chance to clean it up. Then we can talk about how to set the start numbers, resetting them on the first day of the year could be an option. Ryan Vesey 18:57, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Can you please provide me with a link to a discussion relating to this? How anyone could oppose their existence is beyond me, but I'll take your word for it in that regard. In this case, I am wondering if any discussion occurred that concluded with the decision that these categories are not to be used. Ryan Vesey 18:57, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
No. The discussion was actually the other way around, proposing to remove those categories, since tracking can be done without them as well. But there was no consensus for it. Debresser (talk) 19:57, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
So you are saying I shouldn't have created the categories, which is being used to help tracking, because a discussion you still haven't linked to was closed without consensus that these categories aren't useful/should be removed? Ryan Vesey 20:05, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
To see what I was saying, let's have a look at my first post here: "Are you aware that ... existence?" Oh, so I was asking a question! And the question was, whether you were aware of something related to some recent edits of yours. Debresser (talk) 20:14, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
By the way, are you personally in need of those categories for tracking something you are working on? Or did you just think it was a good idea to create these categories? Debresser (talk) 20:14, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Ryan is working on something that all Wikipedians are working on : improving Wikipedia! WikiProject Wikify has cleaned up tens of thousands of articles, and these categories help to achieve this (btw the "new" category is really only a Category:All articles that need to be wikified 2.0) (explained below). Also, could you further explain the methods of tracking without these cats? benzband (talk) 20:22, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
The {{wikify}} template has been deprecated in favor of more specific maintenance templates, covered by WikiProject Wikify. So, instead of old Category:Articles that need to be wikified + monthly listings + Category:All articles that need to be wikified, we now have (or will soon have) such a setup for each template. The lot comes under Category:Articles covered by WikiProject Wikify + monthly listings + Category:All articles covered by WikiProject Wikify.
This will inform editors what the issues are with each page as perceived by the taggers (which won't prevent them from performing any additional tasks, if necessary) rather than a general "wikify" (also which most wikipedians seem to think consists of simply adding wikilinks). It will allow editors who wish to do so to concentrate on a specific category of the backlog. So, it's gonna hopefully increase productivity. Setting up regular drives and measuring the progress is essential to keep the ever-growing backlog in check. benzband (talk) 20:34, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
@Benzband Ask User:Rich Farmbrough. He did a lot of bot editing, and he knows how to track without all inclusive categories. He also knows the precise location of the discussions related tot his issue. Debresser (talk) 20:56, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

The Tea Leaf - Issue Six

Hi! Welcome to the sixth edition of The Tea Leaf, the official newsletter of the Teahouse!

  • Teahouse serves over 700 new editors in six months on Wikipedia! Since February 27, 741 new editors have participated at the Teahouse. The Q&A board and the guest intro pages are more active than ever.
A lovely little teahouse nestled in Germany from Wiki Loves Monuments
  • Automatic invites are doing the trick: 50% more new editors visiting each week. Ever since HostBot's automated invite trial phase began we've seen a boost in new editor participation. Automating a baseline set of invitations also allows Teahouse hosts to focus on serving hot cups of help to guests, instead of spending countless hours inviting.
  • Guests to the Teahouse continue to edit more & interact more with other community members than non-Teahouse guests according to six month metrics. Teahouse guests make more than twice the article edits and edit more talk pages than other new editors.
  • New host process implemented which encourages anyone to get started as a Teahouse host in a few easy steps. Stop by the hosts page and become a Teahouse host today!
  • Host lounge renovations nearing completion. Working closely with Teahouse hosts, we've made some major renovations to the Teahouse Host Lounge - the main hangout and resource space for hosts. Learn more about the improvements here.

As always, thanks for supporting the Teahouse project! Stop by and visit us today!

You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here. EdwardsBot (talk) 00:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

New Project idea

Hi Ryan, would you like to review this for me? Thanks a lot! It's at an idea stage, welcome further ideas! [3] -- RexRowan  Talk  17:08, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Hey Rex, do you want my comments here or there? My question now is, what will the app be used for? Is it used for the articles? If so, we have Simple English Wikipedia. Is it for the talk and discussion pages? If so, I think this makes sense. In addition, your proposal mentioned something downloadable. Wouldn't it be better to create a gadget that someone can turn on in their preferences? Ryan Vesey 16:21, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
That's what I meant, a gadget in the preference list. I think it's implication could be wider such as emails and webpage options. :D -- RexRowan  Talk  16:52, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

New editor buddy program

I'm interested in putting together some (semi) automated infrastructure to help match good newcomers to experienced editors for help/mentoring/adoption, so I'm curious about the direction of this project. Could you point me to any material you've written up? --EpochFail(talk|work) 21:01, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

I had the idea, but I never actually put anything down. Sorry. Ryan Vesey 16:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

User page question

Probably a simple thing for you Ryan...Do you know how i can change the layout of my 6 ribbons at the bottom of my userpage into 2 rows of 3? I tried a few tricks but to no avail. Thanks ツ Jenova20 (email) 12:13, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

What do you think? Ryan Vesey 16:29, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Perfect. Using my higher resolution home computer i can see i'm able to have 6 rows so i kept the code you used for when i get to 8500 edits and get my next ribbon. Thanks Ryan ツ Jenova20 (email) 18:42, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ryan Vesey. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:Teahouse/Host_lounge.
Message added 22:42, 6 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SarahStierch (talk) 22:42, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

For your help on the DPL bot page. It's never fun to get attacked like that and your support was a big lift. Cheers, --JaGatalk 21:19, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

No problem, it always sucks to have something that you worked hard to create attacked by another editor. Ryan Vesey 15:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Category:All articles covered by WikiProject Wikify

Category:All articles covered by WikiProject Wikify, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Courcelles 02:32, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Dabs check

Thanks again for the 217573 dab pages. The purpose was to find exceptions for typos, and in the process typo check the dabs. Dabs are especially good for finding typo exceptions because they have varied wording without the size you find in normal articles, the small size means they can be typo scanned quickly as well as loading quickly. The whole lot was pre-scanned in under 10 days and nights which resulted in 930 articles with possible typos. One day of checking the results enabled me to make typo rule changes here and here as well as correct most of the 930 typos found. Thanks again for creating a list of dab pages. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 11:43, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Plenty O'Toole, General Grubozaboyschikov, and Agent Strawberry Fields

Fail: WP:GNG (no Reception whatsoever), WP:JUSTPLOT, WP:V/WP:RS (only refs were to the works themselves and fansites), etc.

All three have been tagged for notability and merge for several months without effect (nobody did expand/rewrite them significantely or at all, nobody discussing.

I did the same with scores of other similar James Bond articles. I met opposition to redirect only at Charles Robinson (James Bond), so I had it deleted instead.[4]

If you want to know how a fictional character articles should look like, see for example Yuna (Final Fantasy) (for a GA-class type article) and Garrett (character) (for an absolute bare minimum, practically a stub, as it lacks any development information and even most of plot at the moment). Both of these articles are mine.

So you can either just revert your reverts, rewrite some or all of them to make proper articles, make a convincing argument in their defense now, or I might be forced to delete, not just redirect all three of them (I don't really want to do it). --Niemti (talk) 08:29, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

I will not be redirecting them myself. You stated that they had been tagged for merging for month, but that is false. When you want an article to be merged, you must place {{Merge to}} on the offending page and {{Merge from}} on the target page. Then you must start discussion yourself with the reason you feel they should be merged. Frankly, it seems that you have no interest in actually merging them and feel that they should be redirected only. In that case, you should nominate them for deletion and receive the widest possible audience. Ryan Vesey 15:37, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Beacause there's absolutely nothing to merge. All information is plot (and some trivia), there's no real-world perspective, there are not even reliable independent sources. And did you even read WP:GNG and WP:JUSTPLOT? Do it. --Niemti (talk) 21:57, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Help!!!

Apparently someone want to delete my navboxes that I have created over the past year. Could you please comment on it here:Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 September 9. Your input will be appreciated.--Mishae (talk) 15:35, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/HMS Pandora (N42)

Ryan, you still owe a QPQ on this article, and you were also going to update with some information. Can you make a quick post there to let us know how things stand? I don't want some other reviewer or admin to come along and decide that it needs to be shut down for inactivity. Many thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 00:48, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Hey, sorry, I've been moving in and it got put on the back of my to-do list. I've got class virtually all day tomorrow (today in UTC). I'll make every possible effort to get it done on Tuesday night. Just to clarify, QPQ=quid pro quo i.e. reviewing another nom, right? Ryan Vesey 00:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Glad that all's okay, if very busy: you mentioned school starting and the like on the nom. Hope you like your classes! Just to clarify about the Pandora nom page: the important thing is to post there that you're working on things—people tend to give slack as long as they can see that progress is being made, even if slowly. QPQ is indeed the quid pro quo review of another article nom—plenty of guides around on what's involved if you've never done one. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:53, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Page Curation update

Hey all :). We've just deployed another set of features for Page Curation. They include flyouts from the icons in Special:NewPagesFeed, showing who reviewed an article and when, a listing of this in the "info" flyout, and a general re-jigging of the info flyout - we've also fixed the weird bug with page_titles_having_underscores_instead_of_spaces in messages sent to talkpages, and introduced CSD logging! As always, these features will need some work - but any feedback would be most welcome. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 18:21, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Dear future admin...

...I had already voted for you, but it is just a matter of time. Until then, would you consider going to WP:AN and looking at some of the RfCs that need closing? Half really need an admin to close, but there are many that just need an experienced outside party to judge consensus for. One or two a week would be very helpful, and solid experience. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 17:41, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

I doubt he wants to do those now. He really needs a Wikibreak right now. I can go and take a look at some of them for him.—cyberpower ChatOffline 17:50, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

UPenn

Hey Ryan, the rankings were just released today. You can check them out for yourself, but Penn was demoted to #8. Source: http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/spp+50 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unicornsarebeautiful (talk • contribs) 04:09, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

I apologize, I was looking at the sources used in the template. Can you list the sources for your changes at Talk:University of Pennsylvania and then make them? I apologize for any mixup. Ryan Vesey 04:16, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Your Credo account access has been sent to your email!

All editors who were approved for a Credo account and filled out the survey giving their username and email address were emailed Credo account access information. Please check your email.

  • If you didn't receive an email, or didn't fill out the survey, please email me at [email protected]
  • If you tried out Credo and no longer want access, email me at [email protected]

If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me. I hope you enjoy your account! User:Ocaasi 15:38, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low Quality: Low to High Quality: High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Quality: Low Zsolt Erdei   Quality: Low Jaws (James Bond)
Quality: Low Saltimbocca   Quality: Low Axel Schulz
Quality: Low Torsten May   Quality: Low Lucy, Lady Houston
Quality: Low An Na   Merge
Quality: Low Leszek Cichy   Quality: High FIFA 12
Quality: Low HMS H24   Quality: Low Quantum (James Bond)
Quality: Low Parthian class submarine   Quality: High Nikola Tesla
Quality: Low Grzegorz Kielsa   Add sources
Quality: Low HMS H25   Quality: High Boca Raton, Florida
Quality: Low Misha Mansoor   Quality: Low Top Chef (season 8)
Quality: Low Östen Dahl   Quality: Low Downtown Paterson
Quality: Low Nancy Dupree   Wikify
Quality: Low Yoko Toyonaga   Quality: Low Janusz Majer
Quality: Low Jeffrey Chodorow   Quality: Low Kazi Sherpa
Quality: Low Charles Kurzman   Quality: Low Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan
Quality: Low Ian Prosser   Expand
Quality: Low Verena Sailer   Quality: Medium Glen Johnson (boxer)
Quality: Low Wellington Arias   Quality: High Foreign relations of Iran
Quality: Low Bo Cantrell   Quality: Low Judy Havelock

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:02, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ryan Vesey. You have new messages at Jtmorgan's talk page.
Message added 01:49, 15 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jmorgan (WMF) (talk) 01:49, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Could you chime in

Could you chime in at Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser#Wikify on what AWB should replace Wikify with and other fun-filled things. Hope school is going well for you... Of course if you went to a decent school, you wouldn't be partying so hard :) Bgwhite (talk) 01:47, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

What is this "party" you speak of? Wikilink or it doesn't exist. Yeah I'll chime in. Ryan Vesey 02:12, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
When it comes to Wikify, you are Jimbo. I thought Penn was the party school and Penn St. the academic school.... Bgwhite (talk) 05:44, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Penn is considered the "Social Ivy" so if you compare us to Yale or Harvard we'd be considered a party school, but we're certainly more academic than Penn State. I wasn't aware of the "Social Ivy" status when I was accepted so I was fairly surprised when I arrived. Ryan Vesey 15:12, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/HMS Pandora (N42)

Ryan, it's been another week and still nothing. (My note has already been archived from this page.) At this point you need at least to post your intentions at this template. Otherwise you run the risk of someone rejecting it for inactivity, as the last edit to the nomination was 12 days ago. I really hope you can get to the quid pro quo review soon. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:35, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Sorry about that, QPQ done. Ryan Vesey 15:47, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Someone is whining again!

Can you please explain to this creature why I do white space removal? Someone told me it was fine if I will add navbox and/or categories and do it that way, but I am getting sick and tired of whiners!:--Mishae (talk) 17:43, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mishae&action=edit&section=42

Those should remain on separate lines. Ryan Vesey 17:49, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Which ones?--Mishae (talk) 17:51, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
The taxobox. As for removing the white space from == References ==, there isn't a particular reason to do so. I happen to prefer ==References== myself and I get rather annoyed when people on either side argue over it. If someone wants to make the edit, I say let them it doesn't change anything on the article itself. Ryan Vesey 17:54, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Then why does he whines about it? Maybe I should edit and he should shut up?!--Mishae (talk) 17:58, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
To clarify, I wasn't referring to the edits removing the space within headings, but between paragraphs and headings as I linked to in my comment on Mishae's talk page. It becomes more of a problem on longer articles where finding the headings to edit is important and white space does help. Thank you, Ryan Vesey, for backing me up on the template point that they should be on separate lines. Mishae, please be WP:CIVIL. Do not refer to me as a "creature" and do not characterize my legitimate concern as "whining." Thank you, Rkitko (talk) 18:01, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
I was about to point out that Rkitko was more concerned about the taxobox than anything else. Mishae, I can tell you are getting riled up You might want to step away from Wikipedia for a couple of hours so we don't have a repeat of a couple of months ago. Ryan Vesey 18:05, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Rkitko, thanks for clarifrying about headings and other stuff, but I was talking to Ryan, not you. I wasn't trying to say anything bad, just tried to get my opinion in the open. In my opinion what you did was more of whine then a concern, however, I might be wrong, but its my opinion (I think I have a right to say my opinions, no?) Its sad if its not so, that means I could get blocked for pretty much being myself. If it offends you, too bad, I don't know better how to explicit myself then. I try my best though!--Mishae (talk) 18:16, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Why am I such a trouble?..--Mishae (talk) 18:25, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Mishae, it's difficult to continue to assume good faith that you want to engage in a discussion or that you're sincere when, immediately after I leave a polite message on your talk page about a curious behavior I noticed, you come here to another editor's talk page and express your feeling that I'm "whining" and call me a "creature." Believe me, I'm not easily offended and your comments don't offend me, but as Wikipedia policy you should always remain civil and willing to engage in discussions. Further, you then removed my comment from your talk page, which indicates to me that you're unwilling to discuss this matter further except in this context with Ryan Vesey, complaining about me and asking for assistance. To give you an idea of how things ought to have gone, you could have stopped editing, replied on your talk page, and we could have had a brief, civil discussion on the merits of white space. I could have pointed to guidelines and convention to back up my assertion that removing white space makes editing more difficult in the future. I'm still not sure what your argument is because you initially wouldn't engage in a discussion and now we've taken over poor Ryan Vesey's talk page. Would you like to return this discussion to your talk page instead? Cheers, Rkitko (talk) 18:32, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Strange, I tought that deleting anything from my talkpage is O.K. I got blocked for doing that on the Russian Wikipedia, though. No, lets continue to have our civil discussion here. I prefer to talk to Ryan, just to be on the safe side. And I already explaine that to other users, and don't want to argue again to the point of being blocked. Should I mention it again? Fine, I all do it. I remove white space to save some KB on the server, meantime, I also do some constructive editing as well such as adding navboxes and categories. O.K., so I guess I shouldn't edit your articles then? Fair enough.--Mishae (talk) 18:47, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Yes, deleting anything from your talk page is acceptable if that's how you mean to archive it. My point was that it didn't send the right message and that it probably, combined with your message to Ryan Vesey here, escalated things instead of allowing us to talk things over in a calm and rational manner. Does that make sense? As Ryan and many others have pointed out to you, you don't need to worry about saving space on the servers. And in reality, it wouldn't be saving very much space. Additionally, as has already been explained to you, all previous versions of the article are saved in the history, so deleting white space does not save the servers any space. In fact, if you make an edit that just consisted of removing white space, it would add to the server because it would need to record the previous version, your version, and all the associated editing information like date and time and user that made the changes. Your motivation is admirable but unnecessary and doesn't make sense in light of the server-side calculations of space. I hope this makes sense, even though each point has already been made previously to you. Rkitko (talk) 19:28, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
O' and I do assume good faith, just not with every user. I don't understand every user. I can talk to Ryan or Justin, about anything, but when someone new gets in, it spins my mind to negativity (don't know why), but thats how I react. Maybe its not civil, but I do try my best to be that way. Just, not always I can prove it.--Mishae (talk) 18:55, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Mishae, right now the concern is your edits to {{Automatic taxobox}}. For templates like that and {{taxobox}} each parameter should be on a new line. This makes it easy for anyone to see if there are any problems in any of the templates and change those. I'd like to remind you again that the Wikimedia foundation specifically tells us not to worry about the server. Ryan Vesey 18:50, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Like, what problems there might be? How often do people look into a taxobox?--Mishae (talk) 18:55, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Frequently. We need to have certain templates like the taxobox and other infoboxes laid out with each parameter on a different line so that editors can immediately identify problems and update the template. For taxoboxes, we sometimes update the taxonomy as the literature changes and it's so much more difficult to do that repetitive edit when the template is all on one line. We're trying to build an encyclopedia and it should be easy to do so; we shouldn't worry about server space, especially for something so small as white space. Rkitko (talk) 19:28, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Well, I am here to build an encyclopedia as well (see how much I wrote!) Maybe I just haven't seen it yet... Like, what kind of updates? In genus taxoboxes I don't see a reason to update anything! Species are from this genus, that family, that order, and those considered to be either plant or animal, nothing more nothing less. And they will be dedscribed by the same person, binomial authority doesn't change either, since the original author is known! Unless you can bring me an example...--Mishae (talk) 20:41, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Mishae, there are over 160 parameters that can be used in the taxobox. Changes happen and it is much easier to find and edit the parameter you need to update when they are each on their own line. It's that simple. Editors will change images, image captions, range maps, conservation status, perhaps the fossil range with new data, and new synonyms are recognized or published occasionally. Overall we hope the classification is stable, but many taxa are unstable, especially in bacteria, protists, and recently plants! In plants we're still in the midst of switching from the older Cronquist system to the APG III system, which require us to change everything above (and including, in some cases) family. This would have been so much more difficult to identify if the taxobox was on a single line. Please keep infobox template parameters on separate lines; you're not solving any important issue by doing so and actually making it harder for others to edit after you in the future. Thanks, Rkitko (talk) 22:18, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, that explains a lot. However, the % of anyone editing after me is unlikely. I find majority of articles on plants or animals weren't updated (some of them since 2008!) So, I did that, and now they wont be updated for another 4 years or so. I understand what you are trying to say, but please take a look at any article and you will find how recently it was last visited by anyone.--Mishae (talk) 22:38, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Yes, we have very few editors working on the thousands and thousands of taxa articles. And you're right that sometimes it takes a while for other editors to take interest in a subject or taxon and modify it. Frequently, though, with big sweeping changes like those in the plants project or those in molluscs when a new classification scheme is adopted, there will be widespread edits all over the project. A lack of editing activity in the immediate future is not a valid reason to make it harder on that future editor in the eventual possibility when he or she tries to edit an article. You seem to be really trying hard to argue your way out of changing your editing habits with respect to white space instead of accepting that 1) it's a solution in search of a problem and 2) article layout convention is to do the opposite of your current practice. In light of that, please re-examine why this is so important to you - it's a very, very minor and I'd rather not see you get into future disagreements over such a trivial point. Would it be so awful to let it go and follow current practices so that we have a consistent approach to white space throughout the editing side of the encyclopedia? I'm still not sure why you feel so strongly about this. Cheers, Rkitko (talk) 02:48, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Fine. As far as synonyms go though, I do live it as is, I even add the asterix to any synonym that doesn't have it! The reason why I feel strongly about it is that its easier to remove some space and use it for another thing, such as writing an article or adding more info to the existing one, with white space removed. Maybe its because I don't see a problem, I don't know.

Lets see what Ryan have to say about it. After all, I am thankful that I discussed this on his talk page not mine. If I would have discussed it on mine, I would still needed to contact him, because I need a conflict mediator. Without Ryan I probably would have been blocked already. I thank him for it in advance!--Mishae (talk) 04:17, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Re: Elephant headed goddess

I seriously considered using the image of the elephant head goddess but decided the current image selection worked better. There were several factors that went into this decision. First, the Vinayaki article is already receiving special dispensation by the minimum submission lead being ignored (As the instructions at the top of the Template talk:Did you know#Special occasion holding area stipulate, special date requests need to be made at least five days before the requested date. This nomination was submitted less than three days before the desired date.). Second, I considered relative size and encyclopedic development of the two articles. While the elephant head goddess article is longer, it is not clear that either article is significantly better developed or more academically rigorous in presenting its subject. The deciding factor was image aspect ratios. The elephant head goddess image has an aspect ratio of 1:2.15 compared to 1.49:1 for the selected image. The squarer image is much easier to recognize and understand with the small size allowed to DYK on the Main page. --Allen3 talk 12:20, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Siersza Power Station

Thanks for the information. --The Polish (talk) 12:56, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for validating.   — Jasonasosa 21:12, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

I'd just like to point you to the following comment by Dennis Brown from an earlier discussion. Ryan Vesey 21:20, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Bwilkins is voluntarily not acting as an admin and using his primary account. This was not a Wikipedia sanction as it did not take place at ArbCom. It was not an official sanction by Jimmy, who is not flexing his bit to bypass ArbCom. Bwilkins made at least one mistake, and is taking actions to remedy that mistake. Continuing to badger and bludgeon him over it is unseemly and more importantly, it is simply unfair. Fairness doesn't require a policy to back it up, it should be self-evident and applied to everyone equally, admin or not. If you want to demand that admins treat everyone fairly (and I would join you in that) then you must demand the same from yourself and treat him fairly as well. This has gotten out of hand, and needs to stop. I agreed and stated that Bwilkins needed a break, so I feel I am neutral in saying we need to stop bludgeoning him during this break. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 16:29, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your input. I can respect that.   — Jasonasosa 21:25, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Furthermore, he has declined to take administrative action on multiple occasions. He does not explicitly mention Bwilkins because to every extent possible, he would prefer to associate his account as that of a regular editor. The guy needs a break and further discussion just makes it harder for him. Ryan Vesey 21:24, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately, I cannot agree with you because of the fact that he presented himself as an admin on my talkpage...However, I respect DB's input, so we will leave it at that. Thanks,   — Jasonasosa 21:28, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Help!!!

Can you please save the articles from being reverted by Rkitko? I don't understand why he continues to revert [Endemic flora of Australia] category even though it might be important for readers to see not only [Endemic flora of Western Australia] but also the one I mentioned. I would be glad for any help.--Mishae (talk) 02:35, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Can you start this discussion at User talk:Rkitko? Ask him politely for an explanation and I'll watch the discussion and mediate if necessary. Ryan Vesey 02:41, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Here is the link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mishae&action=edit&section=42

I hope I didn't said anything bad this time?! Thanks!--Mishae (talk) 02:55, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

O.K. lets talk about that Category:Endemic flora of Western Australia vs Category:Flora of Australia. First of all, its not flora of Australia that I am concerned about, its more like Category:Endemic flora of Australia since not all plants could be found in Western part of Australia, but all of the species are endemic to Australia as a whole. Get the point? I do remove Category:Flora of Australia and substitute it with [Endemic flora of] if there is a reason for it. What else I don't understand is the point of template {{Italic title}}? See, I wound understand that if you don't put italic signs, then you do need it, but if they are already present, whats the point?--Mishae (talk) 04:31, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ryan_Vesey/Archive_15&oldid=1148816559"