User talk:Rts333

Point Park University

Hello there. When adding to lists of notable people, be sure that they have their own articles. HangingCurve^{Swing for the fence} 02:17, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article to establish notability. If you wish to create such an article, please confirm that your subject is notable according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. 99.156.68.118 (talk) 23:33, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd emphasize HangingCurve's advice. Individuals whose notability has not been established will be deleted. 99.156.68.118 (talk) 23:33, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 99.156.68.118 (talk) 23:49, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. 99.156.68.118 (talk) 23:49, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. 5 albert square (talk) 00:35, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To expand on that block template, Wikipedia is a collaborative project. When someone disagrees with one of your edits, you are expected to discuss it with them, and pursue dispute resolution if necessary. This block is not because I disagree with your edits, but because you appear deaf to concerns raised on this talk page. You will be unblocked if and when you demonstrate a willingness to discuss your contributions with other editors. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]