User talk:Rronaldo79

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Rronaldo79, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Susanna and the Two Old Men, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MBlaze Lightning -talk! 11:35, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Susanna and the Two Old Men[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Susanna and the Two Old Men requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MBlaze Lightning -talk! 11:35, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hans Tschelan for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hans Tschelan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans Tschelan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shirt58 (talk) 12:30, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Hans Tschelan. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hans Tschelan has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 08:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting contents of your article Susanna and the Two Old Men‎[edit]

Hi. You wrote the article Susanna and the Two Old Men‎ and then blanked it after it was tagged incorrectly for deletion as no context. Then it was blanked by you and replaced with a template. Did you intentionally blank the page as somewhat of a request for the page to be deleted from Wikipedia? If so, we can tag it for deletion based on your request, but it was somewhat unclear because it appears there was a test edit following that, which included a new template. Anyway, please respond! Thanks, Appable (talk) 17:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this recent edit to Hans Tschelan, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 17:19, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Susanna and the Two Old Men[edit]

The article Susanna and the Two Old Men has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject to satisfy the notability criteria.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:17, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]