User talk:Rotterdam1953

Welcome!

Hello, Rotterdam1953, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Martial BACQUET 21:11, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:No Surrender .jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:No Surrender .jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:29, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Mar10$69.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Mar10$69.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:No Surrender.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:No Surrender.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 21:14, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:No Surrender .JPG

A tag has been placed on Image:No Surrender .JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:No Surrender .JPG|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 21:35, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Mar10$69.JPG

A tag has been placed on Image:Mar10$69.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Mar10$69.JPG|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 21:35, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:An Ethereal Encounter.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:An Ethereal Encounter.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 21:10, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:LeapIntoLegend.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:LeapIntoLegend.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 21:38, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:AnEtherealEncounter.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:AnEtherealEncounter.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 21:39, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:An Ethereal Encounter.JPG

A tag has been placed on Image:An Ethereal Encounter.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:An Ethereal Encounter.JPG|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 21:40, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:My father. My king.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:My father. My king.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:36, 12 May 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 12:36, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:LeapIntoLegend.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:LeapIntoLegend.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 12:38, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:AnEtherealEncounter.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AnEtherealEncounter.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --(ESkog)^(Talk) 12:39, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:NoSurrender.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:NoSurrender.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 12:39, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image discussion templates

Please do not remove templates from images which are the subject of an active discussion. Such edits are considered vandalism. Instead, if you disagree that the images should be deleted, you should take part in the discussion. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:14, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:My father. My king.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:My father. My king.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --(ESkog)^(Talk) 11:53, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page File:AnEtherealEncounter.JPG has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 16:36, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to File:LeapIntoLegend.JPG. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 16:39, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:21, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Cirt (talk) 21:23, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Arthur Benjamins, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. kollision (talk) 14:41, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that unless you are Arthur Benjamins, you can't just come over here and declare that his work is released to the public domain. We would need a statement from the copyright holder indicating what images were to be released, and the specific licensing terms under which they would be released, sent to [email protected]. Without that, the images will continue to be deleted as copyright violations. I'm sure you understand that we can't just take any anonymous posting on our web site as a legitimate copyright release; if we did, we'd have been shut down a long time ago. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:01, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|Dear Sir/Madam,

I hope I have the correct opening to request being unblocked. I have tried to find the correct forum to register my request but could find nothing that would allow this, so please accept my apologies if this is incorrect and forwarding my request to the correct forum page would be a great assistance.

In the meantime, I have contacted user Eskog and explained the great difficulties I encountered with the legal maze, combined with the confusing manner in which rules and regulations have been stated. I await a reply.

[email protected] are also up to date as to the difficulties encountered.

Although I never set out to 'vandalise' or be 'disruptive', I apologise for any trouble caused and trust that the replies I hope to receive will assist me in becoming a successful Wiki-contributor.

Thanking you in advance,

Yours sincerely,

Rotterdam1953 (talk) 12:04, 18 May 2009 (UTC)}}[reply]

Your block has already expired. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 17:54, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References and citations

Hi. You asked, I note that you have placed an objection in Arthur Benjamins. Could you please explain in non-jargon terms, what you are referring to?

Click on the underlined links in the box I put there. Wikipedia requires verifiable and reliable sources for all articles. In the aforementioned article, there is nothing to indicate where all of this information about Mr. Benjamins comes from; there is no way for a reader to go to the original sources and make sure that the Wikipedia article is accurate.

There are a lot of other problems in that article as well. Wikipedia has a very strong policy mandating a neutral point of view. Material such as, Perhaps giving birth to an entire new movement, his new range of other works could well be described as Abstract Iconography - a new genre addition to the art strata, which has remained stagnant for over ten years is not encyclopedic; it might be suitable for a gallery catalog, but not for Wikipedia. Now, if it said something like "Mr Famous Art Critic says that Mr. Benjamin's new range of works perhaps gives birth to an entire new movement", it would be far more acceptable; as it is, it appears Wikipedia is saying this about Mr Benjamin, but Wikipedia does not make such assertions; it instead quotes those who do.

As it is, this article reads like it was written either by Mr. Benjamin or Mr. Benjamin's publicist, which would also not be acceptable on Wikipedia. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 22:29, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re. Arthur Benjamins

I see your point and to that effect I have removed all ( I hope) of the comments that were considered contentious. The changes have also been added in the 'Edit Summary' box. The 'verifiabe' and 'reliable' sources query...has that been cleared? Mr. Benjamins or his publicist I aint, but just an enthusiast of his works and as such, I may have been perhaps too enthusiastic in my writings of him but as this is my first Wiki project - and hope to continue his Wiki site and to write more - I welcome all constructive criticism. If any contentious material remains in the article, I would appreciate your input. One of the tasks before me is to find out how to legally return the deleted images. I will try to find out via [email protected] but I would be happy to listen to an alternative way.

Rotterdam1953 (talk) 19:43, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Rotterdam1953! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 103 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Arthur Benjamins - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:28, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Abstract Iconography

Before adding this red link to other articles please make an article first - only if this is a notable art movement. Thank you...Modernist (talk) 13:14, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:EXPHRASIS.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:EXPHRASIS.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:EKPHRASIS.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:EKPHRASIS.JPG, which you've attributed to Arthur Benjamins. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:57, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]